Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T03:04:38.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE BED CANOPY IN XENOPHON OF EPHESUS AND THE ICONOGRAPHY OF MARS AND VENUS UNDER THE EMPIRE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2018

Anna Lefteratou
Anna Lefteratou*
Affiliation:
Universität Heidelberganna.lefteratou@uni-heidelberg.de
Get access

Extract

This paper discusses how Roman visual culture might be useful for deciphering the ecphrastic passages of the ancient Greek novel. Whereas ecphrasis has been one of the blossoming topics in the field, the examination of novelistic ecphrasis alongside particular works of art is still a desideratum. As a test case I will use Xenophon of Ephesus’ ecphrasis of the bed canopy depicting Ares’ and Aphrodite's embrace, in the Ephesiaca, a novel that might have been written as early as AD 65. In what follows I will argue that the scene described on the canopy would have stimulated a variety of intertexts, both literary and visual, in the minds of the imperial audience: that is, Xenophon's reader would have been encouraged to recall not just Demodocus’ song of the love of Ares and Aphrodite but also the idealised Roman version of the myth, which was so frequently depicted on frescoes and mosaics in Roman villas in the first century. I then explore Xenophon's ‘interpretatio Romana’ through the adaptations of the Ares and Aphrodite myth found in Plutarch and Lucian.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ramus , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , June 2018 , pp. 78 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © Ramus 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alden, M.J. (1997), ‘The resonances of the song of Ares and Aphrodite’, Mnemosyne 50, 513–29.Google Scholar
Andreassi, M. (2001), Mimi greci in Egitto: Charition e Moicheutria (Bari).Google Scholar
Andreassi, M. (2002), ‘Il mimo tra “consumo” e “letteratura”: Charition e Moicheutria’, AN 2, 30–46.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (1989), Decoding the ancient novel: the reader and the role of description in Heliodorus and Achilles Tatius (Princeton).Google Scholar
Behmenburg, L. (2010), ‘Le mythe comme signe. Ekphrasis et le jeu de la préfiguration dans le roman de Leucippé et Clitophon d'Achille Tatius’, in Auger, D. and Delattre, C. (eds), Mythe et fiction (Paris), 239–55.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. (1994), ‘The Roman house as memory theater: the house of the Tragic Poet in Pompeii’, ABull 76, 225–56.Google Scholar
Bierl, A. (2006), ‘Räume im Anderen und der griechische Liebesroman des Xenophon von Ephesos’, in Loperieno, A. (ed.), Mensch und Raum von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart (Munich/Leipzig), 71–103.Google Scholar
Bierl, A. (2011) ‘Demodokos’ Song of Ares and Aphrodite in Homer's Odyssey (8.266–366)—an Epyllion? Agonistic performativity and cultural metapoetics’, in Baumbach, M. and Bär, S. (eds), Brill's Companion to Greek and Latin ‘Epyllion’ and its reception (Leiden).Google Scholar
Billault, A. (1979), ‘Approche du problème de l’ekphrasis dans les romans grecs’, BAGB 2, 199–204.Google Scholar
Billault, A. (1990), ‘L'inspiration des ekphraseis d’ oeuvres d'art chez les romanciers grecs’, Rhetorica 2/8, 153–60.Google Scholar
Biraud, M. (2009), ‘L’Eroticos de Plutarque et les romans d'amour: éros et écarts’, Rursus 4 (Erotica): http://rursus.revues.org/250.Google Scholar
Blázquez, J.M. (2003), ‘Las vinculaciones de la novela—Asno de oro, Dafnis y Cloe, Las Efesíacas—con la mitología religiosa’, in Blázquez, J.M. (ed.), El Mediterráneo y España en la antigüedad (Madrid), 306–23.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (1970), ‘The Greeks and their past in the Second Sophistic’, P&P 46, 3–41.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (1991), ‘Hellenes and Hellenism in writers of the early Second Sophistic’, in Saïd, S. (ed.), Ἑλληνισμός: Quelques jalons pour une histoire de l'identité grecque, Université des sciences humaines de Strasbourg. Travaux du centre de recherche sur le proche-orient et la Grèce antiques 11.I (Leiden), 183–204.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (1994), ‘The readership of Greek novels in the ancient world’, in J. Tatum (1993), 435–59.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (1995), ‘Names and a gem: aspects of allusion in Heliodorus’ Aethiopica’, in Innes, D., Pelling, C.B.R. and Russell, D.A. (eds), Ethics and rhetoric: classical essays for Donald Russell on his seventy-fifth birthday (Oxford), 269–80.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (1996), ‘The ancient readers of the Greek novels’, in Schmeling, G. (ed.), The novel in the ancient world (Leiden), 87–106.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (2002), ‘The chronology of the earlier Greek novels since B.E. Perry: revisions and precisions’, AN 2, 47–63.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (2008), ‘Literary milieux’, in T. Whitmarsh (2008), 17–38.Google Scholar
Braswell, B.K. (1982), ‘The Song of Ares and Aphrodite: theme and relevance to Odyssey 8’, Hermes 2, 129–37.Google Scholar
Brisson, L., and Tihanyi, C. (2008), How philosophers saved myths: allegorical interpretation and classical mythology (Chicago/London) [orig. publ. 1996].Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1960), ‘Das Lied von Ares und Aphrodite’, RhM 103, 130–44, reprinted:Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (2009), ‘The song of Ares and Aphrodite: on the relationship between the Odyssey and the Iliad’, in Doherty, L. (ed.), Homer's Odyssey: Oxford readings in classical studies (Oxford), 29–43.Google Scholar
Buxton, R. (2009), Forms of astonishment. Greek myths of metamorphosis (Oxford).Google Scholar
Cueva, E.P. (2004), The myths of fiction: studies in the canonical Greek novels (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
Cumont, F. (1942), Recherches sur le symbolisme funéraire des Romains (Paris).Google Scholar
Dalmeyda, G. (1962), Xenophon, Les Ephésiaques ou Le roman d'Habrocomés et d'Anthia (Paris).Google Scholar
Dawson, D. (1992), Allegorical readers and cultural revision in ancient Alexandria (Berkeley).Google Scholar
de Carolis, E. (2001), Gods and heroes in Pompeii (Rome).Google Scholar
de Temmerman, K. (2014), Crafting characters: heroes and heroines in the ancient Greek novel (Oxford).Google Scholar
de Temmerman, K., and Demoen, K. (2011), ‘Less than ideal paradigms in the Greek novel’, in Doulamis, K. (ed.), Echoing narratives: studies of intertextuality in Greek and Roman prose fiction, ANS 13 (Groningen), 1–20.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. (2007), ‘Narratological theory on time’, in de Jong, I. and Nünlist, R. (eds), Time in ancient Greek literature (Leiden), 17–38.Google Scholar
Egger, B. (1994), ‘Looking at Chariton's Callirhoe’, in Morgan, J. and Stoneman, R. (eds), Greek fiction: the Greek novel in context (London/New York), 31–48.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (2007a), Roman Eyes. Visuality and subjectivity in Art and Text (Princeton).Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (2007b), ‘Viewing Ariadne: from ekphrasis to wall painting in the Roman world’, CPh 102, 20–44.Google Scholar
Elsner, J., and Huskinson, J. (2010), Life, death, and representation. Some new work on Roman sarcophagi (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar
Faranton, V. (2012), La nature et ses images dans le roman grec. Les fondements du genre romanesque (Paris).Google Scholar
Farnell, L.R. (1896), The cults of the Greek states (Oxford).Google Scholar
Forbes Irving, P.M.C. (1990), Metamorphosis in Greek myths (Oxford).Google Scholar
Frazier, F. (2008), ‘Eros, Arès et Aphrodite dans l’Erotikos: une reconsidération de la réponse à Pemptides (ch. 13–18)’, in Ferreira, J.R., Van der Stockt, L. and Do Céu Fialho, M. (eds), Philosophy in society: virtues and values in Plutarch (Leuven/ Coimbra), 117–35.Google Scholar
Futre Pinheiro, M., Bierl, A. and Beck, R. (2012), Intende, lector: echoes of myth, religion and ritual in the ancient novel (Berlin/Boston).Google Scholar
Galinski, K. (1998), Augustan culture: an interpretative introduction (Princeton).Google Scholar
Gazda, E.K., and Haeckl, A.E. (1991), Roman art in the private sphere: new perspectives on the architecture and decor of the domus, villa, and insula (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
Georgiadou, A. (1997), Plutarch's Pelopidas: a historical and philological commentary (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1995), Foucault's virginity: ancient erotic fiction and the history of sexuality (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2001), Being Greek under Rome: cultural identity, the second sophistic, and the development of empire (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Görgemanns, H. (2005), ‘Eros als Gott in Plutarchs “Amatorius”’, in Hirsch-Luipold, R. (ed.), Gott und die Götter bei Plutarch. Götterbilder - Gottesbilder - Weltbilder. Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten, (Berlin), 169–95.Google Scholar
Görgemanns, H. (2010), Plutarch, Dialog über die Liebe (Tübingen) [orig. publ. 2006].Google Scholar
Griffiths, J.G. (1978), ‘Xenophon of Ephesus on Isis and Alexandria’, in de Boer, M.B. and Edridge, T.A. (eds), Hommages à M.J. Vermaseren vol.1 (Leiden), 409–37.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. (1971), ‘The naming of characters in the romance of Xenophon Ephesius’, Eranos 69, 25–59.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. (1983), The novel in antiquity (Oxford) [orig. publ. 1980].Google Scholar
Hales, S. (2003), The Roman house and social identity (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Haynes, K. (2003), Fashioning the feminine in the Greek novel (London/New York).Google Scholar
Helbig, W., and Donner, O. (1868), Wandgemälde der vom Vesuv verschütteten Städte Campaniens (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Holzmeister, A. (2014), ‘Ekphrasis in the ancient novel’, in Cueva, E.P. and Byrne, N. (eds), A Companion to the ancient novel (Oxford), 411–26.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (1994), ‘History and historicity in Chariton’, ANRW 34, 2, 1057–84.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2008), ‘Ancient readers’, in T. Whitmarsh (2008), 261–71.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2012), ‘The songs of Demodocus: compression and extension in Greek narrative poetry’, in Baumbach, M. and Bär, S. (eds), Brill's Companion to Greek and Latin epyllion and its reception, (Leiden), 83–110.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2014), Hesiodic voices: studies in the ancient reception of Hesiod's Works and Days (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Huskinson, J. (2015), Roman strigillated sarcophagi (Oxford).Google Scholar
Jones, C.P. (1971), Plutarch and Rome (Oxford).Google Scholar
Jones, M. (2012), Playing the man: performing masculinities in the ancient Greek novel (Oxford).Google Scholar
Kellum, B. (1997), ‘Concealing/revealing: gender and the play of meaning in the monuments of Augustan Rome’, in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds), The Roman cultural revolution (Cambridge), 158–81.Google Scholar
Kleiner, D.E.E. (1981), ‘Second-century mythological portraiture: Mars and Venus’, Latomus 40, 512–44.Google Scholar
Koester, H. (1995), Ephesos, metropolis of Asia: an interdisciplinary approach to its archaeology, religion and culture (Valley Forge PA).Google Scholar
Koning, H. (2010), Hesiod: the other poet (Leiden).Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (1994), Sexual symmetry: love in ancient novel and related genres (Princeton).Google Scholar
Kousser, R.M. (2007), ‘Mythological group portraits in Antonine Rome: the performance of myth’, AJA 111, 673–91.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. (1986), Homer the theologian; neoplatonist allegorical reading and the growth of the epic tradition (Berkeley/Los Angeles).Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. (1988), ‘Plutarch, Hesiod, and the Mouseia of Thespiae’, ICS 13, 491–504.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R., and Keaney, J.J. (1996), Plutarch, Essay on the life and poetry of Homer (Atlanta).Google Scholar
Laplace, M.M. (1996), ‘L'emblème esthétique des Éthiopiques d'Héliodore: une bague d'ambre au chaton d'améthyste gravée’, in Dubois, L.K. (ed.), Poésie et lyrique antiques (Lilles), 179–202.Google Scholar
Lefteratou, A. (2017), Mythological fictions: the bold and faithful heroines of the Greek novel (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar
Levi, D. (1947), Antioch mosaic pavements (Princeton/London).Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. (2008), Bilder machen Räume: Mythenbilder in pompeianischen Häusern (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar
Maeder, D. (1991), ‘Au seuil des romans grecs: effets de réel et effets de création’, GCN 4, 1–33.Google Scholar
Montiglio, S. (2012), Love and providence: recognition in the ancient novel: recognitions in the ancient novel (Oxford).Google Scholar
Morales, H. (2004), Vision and narrative in Achilles Tatius’ Leucippe and Clitophon (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Morales, H. (2011), ‘Fantasizing Phryne: the psychology and ethics of ekphrasis’, The Cambridge Classical Journal 57, 71–104.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. (2004), Longus, Daphnis and Chloe (Oxford).Google Scholar
Morgan, J.R. (1991), ‘Reader and audiences in the Aethiopica of Heliodoros’, GCN 4, 85–104.Google Scholar
Morgan, J.R. (2009), ‘Readers writing readers, and writers reading writers. Reflections of Antonius Diogenes’, in Paschalis, M., Panayotakis, C. and Schmeling, G. (eds), Readers and writers in the ancient novel (Groningen), 127–41.Google Scholar
Muth, S. (1998) Erleben von Raum - Leben im Raum: zur Funktion mythologischer Mosaikbilder in der römisch-kaiserzeitlichen Wohnarchitektur (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, J.N. (1995), Xenophon of Ephesus, his compositional technique and the birth of the novel (Berlin).Google Scholar
Preston, R. (2001), ‘Roman questions, Greek answers: Plutarch and the construction of identity’, in Goldhill, S. (ed.), Being Greek under Rome: cultural identity, the second sophistic, and the development of empire (Cambridge), 86–122.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Montero, C. (1994), ‘Xenophon von Ephesos: ein Überblick’, ANRW 34/2, 1088–138.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Montero, C. (1996), ‘The rise of the novel’, in Schmeling, G.L. (ed.), The novel in the ancient world (Leiden), 28–85.Google Scholar
Russell, D. (2003), ‘The rhetoric of the Homeric Problems’, in Boys-Stones, G.R. (ed.), Metaphor, allegory, and the classical tradition (Oxford), 217–34.Google Scholar
Said, S. (1991), Hellénismos: quelques jalons pour une histoire de l'identité grecque. Actes du Colloque de Strasbourg, 25–27 octobre 1989 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Schmeling, G.L. (1980), Xenophon of Ephesus (Boston).Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1992), ‘Bard and audience in Homer’, in Lamberton, R. and Keaney, J.J. (eds), Homer's ancient readers (Princeton), 3–29.Google Scholar
Shea, C. (1998), ‘Setting the stage for romances: Xenophon of Ephesus and the ecphrasis’, in Hock, R.F., Chance, J.B. and Perkins, J. (eds), Ancient fiction and early Christian narrative (Atlanta), 61–76.Google Scholar
Sichterman, H. (1992), Die mythologischen Sarkophage. Apollon, Ares, Bellerophon, Daidalos, Endymion, Ganymed, Giganten, Grazien. ASR XII,2 (Berlin).Google Scholar
Sirinelli, J. (2000), ‘Plutarque biographe: de l’évocation des morts aux héros de roman’, Cahiers de l'Association internationale des études françaises 52, 143–52.Google Scholar
Smith, S. (2007), Greek identity and the Athenian past in Chariton: the romance of Empire (Groningen).Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2009), Image and text in Graeco-Roman antiquity (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2013), ‘Apparitions apparent: ekphrasis and the parameters of vision in the Elder Philostratus's Imagines’, Helios 40, 97–142.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (2015), Plutarch and his Roman readers (Oxford).Google Scholar
Strocka, V.M. (1997), ‘Mars und Venus in Bildprogrammen pompejanischer Häuser’, in Scagliarini Corlàita, D. (ed.), I temi figurative nella Pittura Parietale Antica, IV sec. a.C.–IV sec. d. C. Atti del IV Convegno Internazionale sulla Pittura Parietale Antica (Bologna), 129–34.Google Scholar
Struck, P.T. (2004), Birth of the Symbol (Princeton).Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1996), Hellenism and the Empire: language, classicism, and power in the Greek world AD 0–250 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Tagliabue, A. (2012), ‘The Ephesiaca as a Bildungsroman’, AN 10, 17–46.Google Scholar
Tagliabue, A. (2013), ‘Thrason's work in the Ephesian Artemision: an artistic inspiration for Xenophon of Ephesus’ Ephesiaca’, Hermes 141, 3, 363–77.Google Scholar
Tatum, J. (ed.) (1993), The search for the ancient novel (London/Baltimore).Google Scholar
Tilg, S. (2010), Chariton of Aphrodisias and the invention of the Greek love novel (Oxford).Google Scholar
Webb, R. (2009), Ekphrasis, imagination and persuasion in ancient rhetorical theory and practice (Farnham).Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2001), Greek literature and the Roman empire: the politics of imitation (Oxford).Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (ed.) (2008), The Cambridge Companion to the Greek and the Roman novel (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2010a), Local knowledge and microidentities in the imperial Greek world (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2010b), ‘Domestic poetics: Hippias’ house in Achilles Tatius’, ClAnt 29, 327–348.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2011), Narrative and identity in the ancient Greek novel: returning romance (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2012), ‘Greek novel and local myth’, in M.P. Futre-Pinheiro, A. Bierl and R. Beck (2002), 39–42.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2013), Beyond the Second Sophistic: adventures in Greek postclassicism (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Winkler, J.J. (1982), ‘The mendacity of Kalasiris and the narrative strategy of Heliodoros’ Aithiopika’, YClS 27, 93–158.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. (2010), ‘Afterword: the local and the global in the Graeco-Roman east’, in Whitmarsh, T. (2010a), 189–200.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (2010), Roman art (Santa Monica).Google Scholar
Zanker, P., and Ewald, B.C. (2012 [2004]), Living with myths: the imagery of Roman sarcophagi, tr. Slater, J. (Oxford) [orig. pub. 2004].Google Scholar
Zanker, P., and Shapiro, A. (1990), The power of images in the age of Augustus, tr. Shapiro, A. (Ann Arbor) [orig. pub. 1988].Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (1990), ‘The poetics of Eros: nature, art, and imitation in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe’, in Halperin, D.M., Winkler, J.J. and Zeitlin, F.I. (eds), Before sexuality: the construction of erotic experience in the ancient Greek world (Princeton), 417–64.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (1993), ‘Gardens of desire in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe’, in J. Tatum (1993), 148–69.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (1996), Playing the Other. Gender and Society in Classical Greek Literature (Chicago).Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (2003), ‘Living portraits and sculpted bodies in Chariton's theater of romance’, in Panayotakis, S. and Zimmerman, M. (eds), The ancient novel and beyond (Leiden), 71–83.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (2008), ‘Religion’, in T. Whitmarsh (2008), 91–108.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (2013), ‘Landscapes and portraits: signs of the uncanny and illusions of the real’, in Paschalis, M. and Panayotakis, S. (eds), The construction of the real and the ideal in the ancient novel, ANS 17 (Groningen), 61–87.Google Scholar