Skip to main content

The power of humility in sceptical religion: why Ietsism is preferable to J. L. Schellenberg's Ultimism


J. L. Schellenberg's Philosophy of Religion argues for a specific brand of sceptical religion that takes ‘Ultimism’ – the proposition that there is a metaphysically, axiologically, and soteriologically ultimate reality – to be the object to which the sceptical religionist should assent. In this article I shall argue that Ietsism – the proposition that there is merely something transcendental worth committing ourselves to religiously – is a preferable object of assent. This is for two primary reasons. First, Ietsism is far more modest than Ultimism; Ietsism, in fact, is open to the truth of Ultimism, while the converse does not hold. Second, Ietsism can fulfil the same criteria that compel Schellenberg to argue for Ultimism.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Ambrosius Aurelius (2013) On the Duties of the Clergy (Savage MN: Lighthouse).
Chignell Andrew (2013) ‘Prolegomena to any future non-doxastic religion’, Religious Studies, 49, 195207.
Crisp Thomas (2013) ‘On coercion, love, and horrors’, Religious Studies, 49, 165179.
Diller Jeannine (2013) ‘The conceptual focus of ultimism: an object of religious concern for the nones and somes’, Religious Studies, 49, 221233.
Dole Andrew (2013) ‘Is sceptical religion adequate as a religion?’, Religious Studies, 49, 235248.
Draper Paul (2011) ‘Faith without God: an introduction to Schellenberg's trilogy’, Philo, 14, 5965.
Fraser Giles (2005) ‘Modernism and the minimal God: on the empty spirituality of the God of the philosophers’, in Harris H. & Insole C. (eds) Faith and Philosophical Analysis: The Impact of Analytical Philosophy on the Philosophy of Religion (Ashgate: Aldershot), 148158.
Howard-Snyder Daniel (2013) ‘Schellenberg on propositional faith’, Religious Studies, 49, 181191.
Macintosh J. J. (2011) ‘Sceptical ultimism, or not so sceptical atheism?’, Philo, 14, 6676.
Morriston Wes (2013) ‘Is faith in the ultimate rationally required? Taking issue with some arguments in The Will to Imagine ’, Religious Studies, 49, 209220.
Penelhum Terence (2013) ‘Religion after atheism’, Religious Studies, 49, 249255.
Schellenberg J. L. (2005) Prolegomena to a Philosophy of Religion (Ithaca: Cornell).
Schellenberg J. L. (2007) The Wisdom to Doubt: A Justification of Religious Skepticism (Ithaca: Cornell).
Schellenberg J. L. (2009) The Will to Imagine: A Justification of Skeptical Religion (Ithaca: Cornell).
Schellenberg J. L. (2011a) ‘A reply to Wykstra’, Philo, 14, 101107.
Schellenberg J. L. (2011b) ‘Reactions to MacIntosh’, Philo, 14, 7784.
Schellenberg J. L. (2013a) Evolutionary Religion (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Schellenberg J. L. (2013b) ‘My stance in philosophy of religion’, Religious Studies, 49, 143150.
Schellenberg J. L. (2013c) ‘Replies to my colleagues’, Religious Studies, 49, 257285.
Schellenberg J. L. (2013d) ‘Ward's review: just the facts’ (unpublished).
Schellenberg J. L. (forthcoming) ‘God for all time: from theism to ultimism’, in Buckareff A. & Nagasawa Y. (eds) Alternative Conceptions of God (New York: Oxford University Press).
Ward Keith (2013) ‘J. L. Schellenberg, Evolutionary Religion (book review)’, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (Online Publisher).
Wykstra Stephen J. (2011) ‘Facing MECCA: ultimism, religious skepticism, and Schellenberg's ‘meta-evidential condition constraining assent’’, Philo, 14, 85100.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Religious Studies
  • ISSN: 0034-4125
  • EISSN: 1469-901X
  • URL: /core/journals/religious-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 103 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 374 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.