Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-md2j5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-12T16:03:05.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Incorporation and harvest management of hairy vetch-based green manure influence nitrous oxide emissions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2019

Tanka P. Kandel*
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK74078, USA
Prasanna H. Gowda
Forage and Livestock Production Research Unit, USDA-ARS Grazinglands Research Laboratory, El Reno, OK73036, USA
Brian K. Northup
Forage and Livestock Production Research Unit, USDA-ARS Grazinglands Research Laboratory, El Reno, OK73036, USA
Alexandre C. Rocateli
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK74078, USA
Author for correspondence: Tanka P. Kandel, E-mail:


In this study, we measured nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from plots of fall-planted hairy vetch (HV, Vicia villosa) grown as a green nitrogen (N) source for following summer forage crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis). Two treatments were compared: (i) HV grown solely as green manure where all biomass was incorporated by tillage, and (ii) harvesting of aboveground HV biomass prior to planting of crabgrass. Fluxes of N2O were measured with closed chamber systems on 27 dates during a 2-month growth period of crabgrass after the termination of HV in early May. At termination, the average aboveground biomass yield of HV was 4.6 Mg ha−1 with 146 kg N ha−1 content. The N2O emissions were as high as 66 g N2O-N ha−1 day−1 on day 1 after HV incorporation, but reached close to zero within a week. Emissions of N2O increased with subsequent rainfall and irrigation events from both treatments but emission peaks were not observed during the rapid growth of crabgrass. Two-month cumulative emission of N2O (mean ± s.e., n = 4) from HV incorporated plots (921 ± 120 g N2O-N ha−1) was three times (P < 0.05) of HV harvested plots (326 ± 30 g N2O-N ha−1). However, crabgrass biomass yields, N concentrations and total biomass N uptake were decreased significantly by harvesting HV. In conclusion, the results suggested that whereas removal of HV biomass for use as forage may significantly reduce N2O emissions, quantity and quality of the following recipient crops may be constrained.

Research Paper
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Current address: Noble Research Institute, LLC, Ardmore, OK 73401.


Adeleke, R, Nwangburuka, C and Oboirien, B (2017) Origins, roles and fate of organic acids in soils: a review. South African Journal of Botany 108, 393406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adviento-Borbe, MA, Doran, JW, Drijber, RA and Dobermann, A (2006) Soil electrical conductivity and water content affect nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide emissions in intensively managed soils. Journal of Environmental Quality 35, 19992010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aulakh, MS, Doran, JW, Walters, DT and Power, JF (1991) Legume residue and soil water effects on denitrification in soils of different textures. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 23, 11611167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baggs, EM, Rees, RM, Smith, KA and Vinten, AJ (2000) Nitrous oxide emission from soils after incorporating crop residues. Soil Use Manage 16, 8287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomew, PW (2015) Timing of nitrogen fertilizer application for annual ryegrass overseeded into unimproved perennial warm-season pasture. Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management 1:2013–0018. doi: 10.2134/cftm2013.0018.Google Scholar
Basche, AD, Miguez, FE, Kaspar, TC and Castellano, MJ (2014) Do cover crops increase or decrease nitrous oxide emissions? A meta-analysis. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 69, 471482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergtold, JS, Ramsey, S, Maddy, L and Williams, JR (2019) A review of economic considerations for cover crops as a conservation practice. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 34, 6276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biederbeck, VO, Bouman, OT, Looman, J, Slinkard, AE, Bailey, LD, Rice, WA and Janzen, HH (1993) Productivity of four annual legumes as green manure in dryland cropping systems. Agronomy Journal 85, 10351043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frøseth, RB, Bakken, AK, Bleken, MA, Riley, H, Pommeresche, R, Thorup-Kristensen, K and Hansen, S (2014) Effects of green manure herbage management and its digestate from biogas production on barley yield, N recovery, soil structure and earthworm populations. European Journal of Agronomy 52, 90102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulding, KWT (2016) Soil acidification and the importance of liming agricultural soils with particular reference to the United Kingdom. Soil Use and Management 32, 390399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holman, JD, Arnet, K, Dille, J, Maxwell, S, Obour, A, Roberts, T, Roozeboom, K and Schlegel, A (2018) Can cover or forage crops replace fallow in the semiarid central great plains? Crop Science 58, 932944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y, Zou, JW, Zheng, XH, Wang, YS and Xu, XK (2004) Nitrous oxide emissions a influenced by amendment of plant residues with different C:n ratios. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 36, 973981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC (2007) Climate change: The physical science basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kandel, TP, Lærke, PE and Elsgaard, L (2016a) Effect of chamber enclosure time on soil respiration flux: a comparison of linear and non-linear flux calculation methods. Atmospheric Environment 141, 245254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandel, TP, Elsgaard, L, Andersen, MN and Lærke, PE (2016b) Influence of harvest time and frequency on light interception and biomass yield of festulolium and tall fescue cultivated on a peatland. European Journal of Agronomy 81, 150160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandel, TP, Gowda, PH, Somenahally, A, Northup, BK, DuPont, J and Rocateli, AC (2018) Nitrous oxide emissions as influenced by legume cover crops and nitrogen fertilization. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 112, 119131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, RC, Wilson, JD, Bean, SR, Presley, DR, Blanco-Canqui, H and Mikha, M (2013) Effect of nitrogen fertilization and cover cropping systems on sorghum grain characteristics. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 61, 57155719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, GW, Das, S, Hwang, HY and Kim, PJ (2017) Nitrous oxide emissions from soils amended by cover-crops and under plastic film mulching: fluxes, emission factors and yield-scaled emissions. Atmospheric Environment 152, 377388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kravchenko, A, Toosi, ER, Guber, AK, Ostrom, NO, Yu, J, Azeem, K, Rivers, ML and Robertson, GP (2017) Hotspots of soil N2O emission enhanced through water absorption by plant residue. Nature Geoscience 10, 496500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutzbach, L, Schneider, J, Sachs, T, Giebels, M, Nykänen, H, Shurpali, NJ, Martikainen, PJ, Alm, J and Wilmking, M (2007) CO2 flux determination by closed-chamber methods can be seriously biased by inappropriate application of linear regression. Biogeosciences (Online) 4, 10051025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledgard, SF (2001) Nitrogen cycling in low input legume-based agriculture, with emphasis on legume/grass pastures. Plant and Soil 228, 4359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X, Petersen, SO, Sørensen, P and Olesen, JE (2015) Effects of contrasting catch crops on nitrogen availability and nitrous oxide emissions in an organic cropping system. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 199, 382393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X, Sørensen, P, Olesen, JE and Petersen, SO (2016) Evidence for denitrification as main source of N2O emission from residue-amended soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 92, 153160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melkonian, J, Poffenbarger, HJ, Mirsky, SB, Ryan, MR and Moebius-Clune, BN (2017) Estimating nitrogen mineralization from cover crop mixtures using the precision nitrogen management model. Agronomy Journal 109, 19441959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, DC, Castellano, MJ, Sawyer, JE and Pantoja, J (2013) Cover crop effects on nitrous oxide emissions: role of mineralizable carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal 5, 17651773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno-Barriga, F, Díaz, V, Acosta, JA, Muñoz, , Faz, Á and Zornoza, R (2017) Organic matter dynamics, soil aggregation and microbial biomass and activity in Technosols created with metalliferous mine residues, biochar and marble waste. Geoderma 301, 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northup, BK and Rao, SC (2016) Effects of legume green manures on non-grain biomass of continuous wheat systems. Agronomy Journal 108, 10111108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugesgaard, S, Petersen, SO, Chirinda, N and Olesen, JE (2017) Crop residues as driver for N2O emissions from a sandy loam soil. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 233, 4554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, SC and Northup, BK (2008) Planting date affects production and quality of grass pea forage. Crop Science 48, 16291635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, SC and Northup, BK (2011) Grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) as pre-plant nitrogen source for continuous conventionally tilled winter wheat. Crop Science 51, 13251333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosecrance, RC, McCarty, GW, Shelton, DR and Teasdale, JR (2000) Denitrification and N mineralization from hairy vetch (Vicia villosa roth) and rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop monocultures and bicultures. Plant and Soil 227, 283290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russenes, AL, Korsaeth, A, Bakken, LR and Dörsch, P (2016) Spatial variation in soil pH controls off-season N2O emission in an agricultural soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 99, 3646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanz-Cobena, A, García-Marco, S, Quemada, M, Gabriel, JL, Almendros, P and Vallejo, A (2014) Do cover crops enhance N2O, CO2 or CH4 emissions from soil in Mediterranean arable systems? Science of the Total Environment 466, 164174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schomberg, HH, Steiner, JL and Unger, PW (1994) Decomposition and nitrogen dynamics of crop residues: residue quality and water effects. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58, 372381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrestha, A, Hesterman, OB, Copeland, LO, Squire, JM, Fisk, JW and Sheaffer, CC (1999) Annual legumes as green manure and forage crops in winter canola (Brassica napus L.) rotations. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 79, 1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J and Meek, D (2004) Repeated biomass removal affects soybean resource utilization and yield. Agronomy Journal 96, 13821389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skiba, U and Smith, KA (2000) The control of nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural and natural soils. Chemosphere-Global Change Science 2, 379386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonitto, C, David, MB and Drinkwater, LE (2006) Replacing bare fallows with cover crops in fertilizer-intensive cropping systems: a meta-analysis of crop yield and N dynamics. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 112, 5872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y, Guo, J, Vogt, RD, Mulder, J, Wang, J and Zhang, X (2018) Soil pH as the chief modifier for regional nitrous oxide emissions: new evidence and implications for global estimates and mitigation. Global Change Biology 24, e617e626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yan, E, Schubert, S and Mengel, K (1996a) Soil pH changes during legume growth and application of plant material. Biology and Fertility of Soils 23, 236242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, E, Schubert, S and Mengel, K (1996b) Soil pH increase due to biological decarboxylation of organic anions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 28, 617624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar