Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Meckled-Garcia, Saladin 2016. Two concepts of justice – and of its scope. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 19, Issue. 5, p. 534.


    Agartan, Kaan 2014. Globalization and the Question of Social Justice. Sociology Compass, Vol. 8, Issue. 6, p. 903.


    LAWFORD-SMITH, HOLLY 2013. Understanding Political Feasibility*. Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 21, Issue. 3, p. 243.


    LITTLE, ADRIAN and MACDONALD, KATE 2013. Pathways to global democracy? Escaping the statist imaginary. Review of International Studies, Vol. 39, Issue. 04, p. 789.


    FOLLESDAL, ANDREAS 2012. Global distributive justice? State boundaries as a normative problem. Global Constitutionalism, Vol. 1, Issue. 02, p. 261.


    Gilabert, Pablo and Lawford-Smith, Holly 2012. Political Feasibility: A Conceptual Exploration. Political Studies, Vol. 60, Issue. 4, p. 809.


    Blunt, Gwilym David 2011. Transnational Socio-economic Justice and the Right of Resistance. Politics, Vol. 31, Issue. 1, p. 1.


    MECKLED-GARCIA, SALADIN 2011. International law and the limits of global justice. Review of International Studies, Vol. 37, Issue. 05, p. 2073.


    ×

Egalitarian challenges to global egalitarianism: a critique

Abstract
Abstract

Many political theorists defend the view that egalitarian justice should extend from the domestic to the global arena. Despite its intuitive appeal, this ‘global egalitarianism’ has come under attack from different quarters. In this article, we focus on one particular set of challenges to this view: those advanced by domestic egalitarians. We consider seven types of challenges, each pointing to a specific disanalogy between domestic and global arenas which is said to justify the restriction of egalitarian justice to the former, and argue that none of them – both individually and jointly – offers a conclusive refutation of global egalitarianism.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Review of International Studies
  • ISSN: 0260-2105
  • EISSN: 1469-9044
  • URL: /core/journals/review-of-international-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×