Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:21:18.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

European integration as colonial discourse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2010

NECATI POLAT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A not infrequent musing on the growing European integration is that the process may signal a historic discontinuity with the logic and functioning of the modern state, forming an alternative to the Westphalian order. This article takes issue with this notion, holding that, more accurately, the interaction in Europe between the currents of post-national integration and the nation-state may have reduced the integrated Europe to a mere parody of the nation-state. In articulating this argument, the article draws on the ‘hybrid’ anxiety placed by Homi Bhabha at the heart of the encounter between the coloniser and the colonised – a binary perversely reproduced, the article claims, in the dichotomy between the European integration and the European nation-state. Next, through a discussion of ‘catachresis’ and ‘time-lag’, strategies of reversal introduced by Gayatri Spivak and Bhabha, respectively, the article rehearses ideas as to whether or not something of a post-Westphalian order can still be salvaged from the ongoing process of integration. Throughout, the article seeks to rely on the later Wittgenstein on meaning, especially his privileging of what is conventionally treated as secondary in meaning formation; namely appearances, difference, absence, mimesis, and the burlesque, as opposed to a transcendental essence, presence, or identity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 1255 - 1272
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ruggie, John Gerard, ‘Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations’, International Organization, 47 (1993), p. 140.Google Scholar

2 Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Why Europe Needs a Constitution’, New Left Review, 11 (2001), p. 15.Google Scholar

3 Ruggie, ‘Territoriality and Beyond’, p. 172.

4 Billig, Michael, Banal Nationalism (London: Sage, 1995).Google Scholar

5 Shore, Chris, Building Europe: The Cultural Politics of European Integration (London: Routledge, 2000), p. 64Google Scholar , borrowing the term from Michael Hechter's study of national development in the context of Britain and the ‘Celtic fringe’.

6 Derrida, Jacques, Of Grammatology, trans. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976), p. 49.Google Scholar

7 Bhabha, Homi K., The Location of Culture (London: Routledge, 1994), p. 110.Google Scholar

8 Ibid., pp. 102–4.

9 Ibid., p. 121.

10 Ibid., p. 113.

11 Hegel, G. W. F., The Phenomenology of Mind [1807], trans. Baillie, J. B. (New York: Harper & Row, 1967), p. 237.Google Scholar

12 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations [1953], trans. Anscombe, G. E. M. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1968), paras 65–7.Google Scholar

13 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, The Blue and Brown Books [1958] (Oxford: Blackwell, 1969), pp. 24–25.Google Scholar

14 Bhabha, Location of Culture, p. 112.

15 Rephrasing Kurt Vonnegut in Mother Night, cited by Žižek, Slavoj, Enjoy Your Symptom! (New York and London: Routledge, 1992), p. x.Google Scholar

16 European Community, ‘Report Submitted to the Milan European Council, June 28–29, 1985’, Bulletin of the European Communities, supplement 7/85, pp. 18–30.Google Scholar

17 See Shore, Building Europe, pp. 47–8.

18 Ibid., p. 48, citing ‘A People's Europe: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament’ (7 July 1986).

19 Clark, Caryl, ‘Forging Identity: Beethoven's “Ode” as European Anthem’, Critical Inquiry, 23 (1997), p. 796Google Scholar , citing Consultative Assembly of the Council of Europe, ‘Explanatory Memorandum by Mr. Radius’ (10 June 1971).

20 Clark, ‘Forging Identity’, p. 803.

21 Ibid., p. 800.

22 Shore, Building Europe, pp. 50–2.

23 European Community, ‘Resolution of the Representatives of the Government of the Member States of the European Communities, June 23, 1981’, Official Journal of the European Communities, C 241 (19 September 1981), pp. 1–7.Google Scholar

24 Bhabha, Location of Culture, p. 120.

25 Licata, Laurent and Klein, Olivier, ‘Does European Citizenship Breed Xenophobia? European Identification as a Predictor of Intolerance Towards Immigrants’, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 12 (2002), pp. 332–333.Google Scholar

26 Wæver, Ole, ‘European Security Identities’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 34 (1996), p. 122.Google Scholar

27 Balibar, Etienne, We the People of Europe? Reflections on Transnational Citizenship, trans. Swenson, James (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004), p. 43.Google Scholar

28 Hepple, Bob, ‘Race and Law in Fortress Europe’, The Modern Law Review, 67 (2004), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

29 Delanty, Gerard, Inventing Europe: Idea, Identity, Reality (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1995), p. 111.Google Scholar

30 Ibid., pp. 111–2.

31 Kagan, Robert, Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order (New York: Knopf, 2003).Google Scholar

32 Berenskoetter, Felix Sebastian, ‘Mapping the Mind Gap: A Comparison of US and European Security Strategies’, Security Dialogue, 36 (2005), pp. 71–92.Google Scholar

33 See Cohen, Benjamin J., The Geography of Money (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998)Google Scholar , discussed in Kaelberer, Matthias, ‘The Euro and European Identity: Symbols, Power and the Politics of European Monetary Union’, Review of International Studies, 30 (2004), pp. 161–178.Google Scholar

34 Kaelberer, ‘Euro and European Identity’, p. 170.

35 Renan, Ernest, ‘What is a Nation?’ in Bhabha, Homi K. (ed.), Nation and Narration (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar

36 Giddens, Anthony, Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Cambridge: Polity, 1991), p. 18Google Scholar , discussed in Kaelberer, ‘Euro and European Identity’, pp. 167–8.

37 Derrida, Of Grammatology, p. 296: ‘Sovereignty is presence, and the delight in presence’. See Derrida's discussion, in this work, of the traditional binary of speech and writing, presence and absence, marked by a deconstructive tension and reversal, arguably reproduced here in the dichotomy between sovereignty and money.

38 Kokott, Juliane and Rüth, Alexandra, ‘The European Convention and Its Draft Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe: Appropriate Answers to the Laeken Questions?’, Common Market Law Review, 40 (2003), p. 1320.Google Scholar

39 Dicey, A. V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (London: Macmillan, 1908), p. 22.Google Scholar

40 Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, p. 207.

41 de Saussure, Ferdinand, Course in General Linguistics, trans. Baskin, Wade (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966), p. 120Google Scholar : ‘in language there are only differences without positive terms’ (emphasis in original).

42 Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), p. 14.Google Scholar

43 Wæver, ‘European Security Identities’, p. 122.

44 Diner, Dan, ‘Restitution and Memory: The Holocaust in European Political Cultures’, New German Critique, 90 (2003), p. 42.Google Scholar

45 Judt, Tony, ‘The Past Is Another Country: Myth and Memory in Postwar Europe’, Daedalus, 121 (1992), pp. 83–118.Google Scholar

46 Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’, in Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1988)Google Scholar ; Spivak, Critique of Postcolonial Reason, from p. 287.

47 Ibid., p. 304.

48 Ibid.

49 Bhabha, Location of Culture, p. 10.

50 Horkheimer, Max and Adorno, Theodor, Dialectic of Enlightenment, trans. Cumming, John (New York: Continuum, 1994).Google Scholar

51 Bauman, Zygmunt, ‘Sociology After the Holocaust’, The British Journal of Sociology, 39 (1988), pp. 469–497.Google Scholar

52 Bhabha, Homi K., ‘Postcolonial Authority and Postmodern Guilt’, in Grossberg, Lawrence, Nelson, Carry and Treichler, Paula A. (eds), Cultural Studies (London: Routledge, 1992), pp. 56–68Google Scholar ; Bhabha, Location of Culture, ch. 9.

53 Ibid., pp. 183–4.

54 Negri, Antonio, Time for Revolution, trans. Mandarini, Matteo (New York: Continuum, 2003), pp. 139–261.Google Scholar

55 Horkheimer and Adorno, Dialectic of Enlightenment.

56 Bhabha, ‘Postcolonial Authority’, p. 59; bracketed reference to Fanon omitted.

57 Jameson, Fredric, ‘Postmodernism and Consumer Society’, in Foster, Hal (ed.), The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture (Seattle: Bay Press, 1983), p. 120.Google Scholar See, for Bhabha on Jameson's ‘postmodern schizo-fragmentation’, Location of Culture, ch. 11.

58 Hoffmann, Stanley, ‘Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation State and the Case of Western Europe’, Daedalus, 95 (1966), pp. 862–915.Google Scholar