Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 22
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Becker, Michael E. Cohen, Matthew S. Kushi, Sidita and McManus, Ian P. 2016. Reviving the Russian empire: the Crimean intervention through a neoclassical realist lens. European Security, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 112.

    Berejikian, Jeffrey D. 2016. David versus Goliath: Risk and Weaker State Confrontation. Foreign Policy Analysis, p. orw037.

    Furness, Mark and Olsen, Gorm Rye 2016. Europeanisation and the EU's comprehensive approach to crisis management in Africa. European Politics and Society, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 105.

    Hartig, Falk 2016. How China Understands Public Diplomacy: The Importance of National Image for National Interests. International Studies Review, p. viw007.

    He, Kai 2016. Explaining United States–China relations: neoclassical realism and the nexus of threat–interest perceptions. The Pacific Review, p. 1.

    Köstem, Seçkin 2016. When Can Idea Entrepreneurs Influence Foreign Policy? Explaining the Rise of the “Turkic World” in Turkish Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis, p. orw016.

    Armijo, Leslie Elliott and Katada, Saori N. 2015. Theorizing the Financial Statecraft of Emerging Powers. New Political Economy, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 42.

    Brostrom, Jannika 2015. Morality and the national interest: towards a ‘moral realist’ research agenda. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, p. 1.

    Contessi, Nicola P. 2015. Foreign and Security Policy Diversification in Eurasia: Issue Splitting, Co-alignment, and Relational Power. Problems of Post-Communism, Vol. 62, Issue. 5, p. 299.

    Elliott Armijo, Leslie and Rhodes, Sybil 2015. Can International Relations and Comparative Politics Be Policy Relevant? Theory and Methods for Incorporating Political Context. Politics & Policy, Vol. 43, Issue. 5, p. 611.

    Foulon, Michiel 2015. Neoclassical Realism: Challengers and Bridging Identities. International Studies Review, p. n/a.

    Ipek, Pinar 2015. Ideas and Change in Foreign Policy Instruments: Soft Power and the Case of the Turkish International Cooperation and Development Agency. Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol. 11, Issue. 2, p. 173.

    Olsen, Gorm Rye 2015. ‘Great power’ intervention in African armed conflicts. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 28, Issue. 2, p. 229.

    Smith, Nicholas Ross 2015. The EU and Russia's conflicting regime preferences in Ukraine: assessing regime promotion strategies in the scope of the Ukraine crisis. European Security, Vol. 24, Issue. 4, p. 525.

    Kropatcheva, Elena 2014. He who has the pipeline calls the tune? Russia's energy power against the background of the shale “revolutions”. Energy Policy, Vol. 66, p. 1.

    Massie, Justin 2014. Public Contestation and Policy Resistance: Canada's Oversized Military Commitment to Afghanistan. Foreign Policy Analysis, p. n/a.

    Olsen, Gorm Rye 2014. Fighting terrorism in Africa by proxy: the USA and the European Union in Somalia and Mali. European Security, Vol. 23, Issue. 3, p. 290.

    Armijo, Leslie Elliott 2013. Equality and Regional Finance in the Americas. Latin American Politics and Society, Vol. 55, Issue. 4, p. 95.

    Quinn, Adam 2013. Kenneth Waltz, Adam Smith and the Limits of Science: Hard choices for neoclassical realism. International Politics, Vol. 50, Issue. 2, p. 159.

    Kaczmarski, Marcin 2012. Domestic Sources of Russia's China Policy. Problems of Post-Communism, Vol. 59, Issue. 2, p. 3.


Systemic pressures and domestic ideas: a neoclassical realist model of grand strategy formation


Scholars in international relations have long known that ideas matter in matters of international politics, yet theories of the discipline have failed to capture their impact either in the making of foreign policy or the nature of the international system. Recent reengagement with the insights of classical realists has pointed to the possibility of a neoclassical realist approach that can take into account the impact of ideas. This article will suggest that the study of grand strategy can enlighten the intervening ideational variables between the distribution of power in the international system and the foreign policy behaviour of states, and thus constitute the key element in a neoclassical realist research agenda.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Review of International Studies
  • ISSN: 0260-2105
  • EISSN: 1469-9044
  • URL: /core/journals/review-of-international-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *