Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 9
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Haklai, Oded and Norwich, Liora 2016. Bound by Tradition: The Exclusion of Minority Ethnonational Parties from Coalition Governments—A Comparison of Israel and Canada. Ethnopolitics, Vol. 15, Issue. 3, p. 265.


    Ravenhill, John 2016. Region-Building in Africa.


    Hussain, Imtiaz and Dominguez, Roberto 2015. North American Regionalism and Global Spread.


    Carranza, Mario E. 2014. Resilient or Declining? Latin American Regional Economic Blocs in the Postneoliberal Era. Latin American Politics and Society, Vol. 56, Issue. 3, p. 163.


    Gluszek, Alicja 2014. The Security and Prosperity Partnership and the Pitfalls of North American Regionalism. Norteamérica, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 7.


    Prys, M. 2013. India and South Asia in the world: on the embeddedness of regions in the international system and its consequences for regional powers. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 13, Issue. 2, p. 267.


    Hameiri, Shahar and Jayasuriya, Kanishka 2011. Regulatory Regionalism and the Dynamics of Territorial Politics: The Case of the Asia-Pacific Region. Political Studies, Vol. 59, Issue. 1, p. 20.


    Haglund, David G. 2010. Pensando lo imposible: Why Mexico Should Be the Next New Member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Latin American Policy, Vol. 1, Issue. 2, p. 264.


    Prys, Miriam 2010. Hegemony, Domination, Detachment: Differences in Regional Powerhood. International Studies Review, Vol. 12, Issue. 4, p. 479.


    ×

The contradictions of regionalism in North America

Abstract
Abstract

Students of regionalism almost reflexively include North America in their lists of regions in contemporary global politics. Inevitably students of regionalism point to the integrative agreements between the countries of North America: the two free trade agreements that transformed the continental economy beginning in the late 1980s – the Canada–US Free Trade Agreement that came into force on 1 January 1989, and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between the United States, Mexico, and Canada, that came into force on 1 January 1994 – and the Secutity and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), launched in March 2005. These agreements, it is implied, are just like the integrative agreements that forge the bonds of regionalism elsewhere in the world. We argue that this is a profound misreading, not only of the two free trade agreements of the late 1980s and early 1990s and the SPP mechanism of 2005, but also of the political and economic implications of those agreements. While these integrative agreements have created considerable regionalisation in North America, there has been little of the regionalism evident in other parts of the world. We examine the contradictions of North America integration in order to explain why North Americans have been so open to regionalisation but so resistant to regionalism.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Review of International Studies
  • ISSN: 0260-2105
  • EISSN: 1469-9044
  • URL: /core/journals/review-of-international-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×