Nostalgia, Gender, and the Countryside: Placing the ‘Land Girl’ in First World War Britain
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 October 2008
In December 1917, an article in the Daily Chronicle, entitled ‘The New Land Lady’, stated that:
One of the good things which may issue from this war is a revival of the old English countryside.
The happy village may be born again.
If this reformation should come, it will be the work of the women.
The nostalgia evident in this call for women's wartime ‘return’ to the land to restore a lost, pastoral idyll during an event more usually associated with modernity raises several questions. What meanings can be attached to the ways in which women agricultural workers were seen as the key to a ‘rural revival’ and thus as crucial to a revitalized nation during the First World War? And what are we to make of the seemingly contradictory appeal to women radically to leave their presumably urban and suburban homes and conservatively to restore the countryside?
As Raymond Williams pointed out, this emblematic English countryside has always been placed in a more ideal past, and the desires to return to or to preserve the allegedly unchanging patterns of land and the lives attached to it are integral to the problem of modernization itself. More recently, Alun Howkins has argued that the ideology and ‘ideal’ of England and Englishness have remained essentially ‘rural,’ and that in 1914 this was the vision of Englishness that ‘went into battle'. However, one might certainly be forgiven for assuming that the creation of the Women's Land Army and the resulting appearance of urban women in trousers, breeches and puttees in villages throughout Britain would herald something more like a ‘transformation’ than a ‘revival’.
- Research Article
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999
1. ‘The New Land Lady’, Daily Chronicle, 15th December 1917.Google Scholar Women's Work Collection, Imperial War Museum [WWC].
3. Howkins, Alun, ‘The Discovery of Rural England’ in Englishness: Politics and Culture 1880–1920, eds. Coll, Robert and Dodd, Philip (London, 1986), pp. 62–88.Google Scholar
4. The Second Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary, defines ‘home’ or ‘domestic’ as adjectives used to modify the military term ‘front’ or ‘organized sectors of activity’, citing Punch's 1919 History of the Great War. ‘Front’, Oxford English Dictionary, VI, 214. See also the entry for ‘home-fire’, VII, 327.
5. ‘Your Country's Call’, Parliamentary Recruiting Poster, I[mperial] W[ar] M[useum]. See Howkins, , ‘The Discovery of Rural England’, pp. 62–63.Google Scholar
7. For a general histories, see Horn, Pamela, Rural Life in England in the First World War (Dublin, 1984)Google Scholar, chapter 6; Twinch, Carol, Women On the Land: Their Story During Two World Wars (Cambridge, 1990).Google Scholar For a recent celebratory study that focuses on the Second World War, see Tyrer, Nicola, They Fought in the Fields: The Women's Land Army, The Story of a Forgotten Victory (London, 1996).Google Scholar Twinch emphasizes that there are no archives for the Women's Army, Land, Women On the Land, p. xGoogle Scholar, and thus evidence, particularly for the First World War, is not very extensive. The best source remains the Women's Work Collection at the Imperial War Museum. See also the discussion in Ouditt, Sharon, Fighting Forces, Writing Women: Identity and Ideology in the First World War (London, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, chapter 2.
10. Horn notes that not all recruits found the ‘armlet’ appealing, p. 121.
11. Twinch, , Women on the LandGoogle Scholar, chapter 2. See pp. 34–5 for information on wages and also the poster detailing ‘conditions and terms’ for the Women's Land Army reproduced on p. 17.
13. Daily News, 10th June 1916. WWC. This attitude towards getting British women to act like French women was also articulated by M.P.A. Hankey, Secretary to the War Cabinet, as discussed in Twinch, , Women on the LandGoogle Scholar, chapter 1.
16. For examples of these perspectives, see ‘Women's War Work’, The Salisbury Times, 25th February 1916Google Scholar; ‘Women and Farm Labour’, Reading Mercury 8th April 1916Google Scholar; ‘Women and Farm Work’, The Englishwoman, 88 (April 1916)Google Scholar; ‘Not Too ‘Well-Brought-Up’ For the Land’, The Englishwoman, 94 (Oct. 1916)Google Scholar; ‘The Land Army at Home’, Daily Express, 29th January 1917Google Scholar; and ‘Women's Work in the Country’, Queen, 20th April 1918.Google Scholar
21. Wolseley, , Women and the Land, p. 14Google Scholar, speaks of ‘the good example of our educated women’.
22. ‘Women On the Land’, Evening Standard, 1st September 1916Google Scholar and ‘The Women's Land Army at Work’, Daily Chronicle, 16th August 1917Google Scholar, WWC. See also a heated exchange of letters to the Editor in the Oxford Chronicle of May 1917, particularly ‘Women and the Land’, letter to the Editor, Oxford Chronicle, 18th May 1917Google Scholar, after which the Editor stated that ‘We can publish no further letters on this subject’.
25. This included assuming that they adhered to the double standard and that any hint of sexual misconduct by individual women would taint the reputation of the Women's Land Army as a whole. See the discussion in Horn, , Rural Life in England, pp. 130–132.Google Scholar
26. Department of Art, IWM: PR 62–5473.
27. Department of Art, IWM: POS 5997 and IWM: POS 356.
45. Reprinted in Mr. Punch's History of the Great War, p. 253.
49. Land 6 1/4, WWC and quoted in Ouditt, , Fighting Forces, Writing Women, p. 55.Google Scholar Note how this song's image of ‘brown’ strong women contrasts with The Landswoman's advertisements discussed above.
50. Harold Begbie, ‘Up, Ladies, Up’, in ‘Women's Land Army’, Department of Art, IWM: POS 355. Begbie was the author of one of the most popular poems of the First World War, called ‘Fall In’. It was first published in the Daily Chronicle in August 1914 and later set to music.