Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T00:24:58.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aesthetics, Technology, and the Capitalization of Culture: How the Talking Machine Became a Musical Instrument

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Marsha Siefert
Marsha Siefert
Affiliation:
Central European University, Budapest
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article uses the history of early sound recording technology in the united States between 1878 and 1915 to show how published discourse contributed to the way the talking machine was defined and situated as a commercially viable product. Comparing the published accounts of Edison's phonograph and Berliners gramophone in popular scientific articles between 1878 and 1896 illustrates that technological advances in sound recording technology take on important cultural meanings. Critical to these meanings is the way in which the technological “fidelity” is linguistically transformed into an aesthetic quality, projected and interpreted within demonstrable values of musical culture. Beginning in 1902, the Victor Talking Machine Company, formed to market the gramophone, took advantage of these cultural meanings to claim a technological advantage over Edison's cylinder recorder. Whose voice was recorded became part of the claim to technological superiority. The Victor Company succeeded in capitalizing “Culture” by promoting their recordings of opera stars like Enrico Caruso as technologically and culturally faithful to live musical performance and as a democratically available access to a privileged lifestyle. Thus did the Victor Company use a terrier and a tenor to legitimate their talking machine as an American musical instrument

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , Summer 1995 , pp. 417 - 449
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldridge, B. L. [1964] 1983 “The Victor Talking Machine Company.” In The Encyclopedic Discography of Victor recordings, compiled by Fagan, Ted and Moran, William R.. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. Originally published by RCA. 1 June 1964.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1968. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Illuminations, edited by Arendt, Hannah, 219–53. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Berliner, Emile. 1888. “The Gramophone: Etching the Human Voice.” Journal of the Franklin Institute, 22 June, 425–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berliner, Emile. 1895. “Technical Notes on the Gramophone”. Journal of the Franklin Institute, December, 436.Google Scholar
Bernays, Edward L. 1965. Biography of an Idea: Memoirs of Public Relations Counsel. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Bijker, Wiebe E., Hughes, Thomas P., and Pinch, Trevor J., eds. 1987. The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Blackley, Becky. 1983. The Autoharp Book. Brisbane, Calif.: i.a.d. publications.Google Scholar
Boorstin, Daniel. 1973. The Americans: The Democratic Expreience. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984 Distinction: A Social Critique of Taste. New York: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bryson, H. Courtney. 1935. The Gramophone Record. Introduction by Stone, Christopher. London: Ernest Benn.Google Scholar
Chew, V. K. 1967. Talking Machines 1877–1914: Some Aspects of the Early History of the Gramophone. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Dearling, Robert, and Celia, Dearling. 1984. The Guiness Book of Recorded Sound. London: Guiness Books.Google Scholar
Douglas, Susan J. 1987. Inventing American Broadcasting: 1899–1922. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Du Moncel, T. A. L. [1879] 1974. The Telephone, the Microphone and the Phonograph. New York: Originally published by Harper & Brother.Google Scholar
Edison, Thomas A. 1878. “The Future of the Phonograph”. North American Review. May/June.Google Scholar
Edison, Thomas A. 1888. “The Perfected Phonograph.” North American Review, June.Google Scholar
Gaisberg, Frederick William. [1942] 1977. The Music Goes Round: An Autobiography. New York: Arno.Google Scholar
Gelatt, Roland. 1977. The Fabulous Phonograph, 1877–1977, 2nd rev. ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Greenfield, Howard. 1983. Caruso. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Harvith, John, and Susan, Edwards Harvith, eds. 1987. Edison, Musicians, and the phonograph: A Century in Retrospect. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Hindle, Brooke. 1981. Emulation and Invention. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Joseph. 1987. Understanding Toscanini: How He Became an American Culture-God and Helped Create a New Audience for Old Music. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Hughes, Thomas P. 1976. Thomas Edison: Professional Inventor. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Hughes, Thomas P. 1987. “The Evolution of Large Technological System.” In Bijker et al. 1987, 51–82.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Henry N. 1982. Building Your Best Voice. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Jones, Steve. 1992. Rock Formation: Music, Technology and Mass Communication. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josephson, Matthew. 1959. Edison: A Biography. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Levine, Lawrence. 1988. Highbrow, Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loesser, Arthur. 1954. Men, Women & Pianos: A Social History. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Lowe, Jacques, Russell, Miller, and Roger, Boar. 1982. The Incredible Music Machine.London: Quartet/Visual Arts Books.Google Scholar
Marvin, Carolyn. 1988. When old Technologies were New. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Millard, André. 1990. Edison and the Business of Invention. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mott, Frank Luther. 1957. A History of American Magazines, vol. 3: 1865–1885. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Musselman, Joseph. 1971. Music in the Cultured Generation: A Social History of Music in America, 1870–1900. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Pleasants, Henry. 1981. The Great Singers: From Jenny Lind and Caruso to Callas and Pavarotti, rev. ed. New York: Fireside.Google Scholar
Prescott, George B. 1878. The Speaking Telephone, Talking phonograph and Other Novelties. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Read, Oliver, and Welch, Walter L.. [1959] 1976. From Tin Foil to Stereo: Evolution of the Phonograph. 2nd. ed. Indianapolis: Howard W. Sams.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Emily. 1981. “‘The Instrument of the Immortals’ or ‘Music for the Millions’: The Manufacture and Sales of Pianos in America.” In The Piano. The Schubert Club.Google Scholar
Sanjek, Russell. 1988. American Popular Music and Its Business: The First Four Hundred Years, vol. 2: From 1790 to 1909. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schiller, Dan. 1981. Objectivity and the News: The Public and the Rise of Commercial Journalism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Siefert, Marsha. 1986. “Electrifying Performances: Opera Singing and the Media in Early Twentieth-Century America.” Paper presented at the Mellon Seminar on “Technology and Culture,” 3 December.Google Scholar
Siefert, Marsha. 1994 “The Audience at Home: The Recording Industry and the Marketing of Musical Taste in Early Twentieth-Century America.” In Audiencemaking: How the Media Create the Audience, edited by Ettema, James S. and Charles Whitney, D., 186–214 Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Steane, J. B. 1974 The Grand Tradition: Seventy Years of singing on Record. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Sterling, Christopher H., and Haight, Timothy R.. 1978. The Mass Media: Aspen Guide to Communication Industry Trends. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Susman, Warren. 1983. Culture as History: The Transformation of American Society in the Twentieth Century. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Wachhorst, Wyn. 1981. Thomas Alva Edison: An American Myth. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wile, Fredesic William. 1926. Emile Berliner: Maker of the Microphone. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merill.Google Scholar
Wile, Raymond R. 1987. “Record Piracy: The Attempts of the Sound Industry to Protect Itself against Unauthorized Copying, 1890–1978.” ARSC Journal, 20–21.Google Scholar
Wile, Raymond R. 1994. “William Barry Owen.” In Dictionary of Twentieth-Century British Business Leaders, compiled by Jeremy, David J. and Tweedale, Geoffrey. London: Bowker Sauer.Google Scholar
Wilson, Christopher P. 1983 “The Rhetoric of Consumption: Mass-Market Magazines and the Demise of the Gentle Reader, 1880–1920.” In The Culture of Consumption: Critical Essays in American History, 1880–1980, edited by Fox, Richard Wightman and Jackson Lears, T. J.. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Winston, Brian 1987. Misunderstanding Media. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar