Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:10:14.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Lawyer and the Lightning Rod

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Jessica Riskin
Jessica Riskin
Affiliation:
Program in Science, Technology and SocietyMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridge, Massachusetts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the summer of 1783, a trial took place in the French city of Arras. One M. de Vissery, a resident of the nearby village of St. Omer, was appealing a decision by his local aldermen, who required him to remove a lightning rod he had put on his chimney. His young defense lawyer was Maximilien Robespierre, who made a name for himself by winning the case. In preparation, Robespierre and his senior colleague corresponded with natural philosophers and jurisconsultants. Robes- pierre then persuasively resolved the crucial problem, namely, the proper relations of scientific to legal authority. He exploited the empiricist dogma common to contemporary physics and jurisprudence to argue that judges need not defer to scientific experts, but must only consider the facts, which required no expertise. It was a first approximation of an argument Robespierre would make with mounting authority over the next decade.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , Spring 1999 , pp. 61 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Correspondence of Antoine-Joseph Buissart and Louis CotteGoogle Scholar
Letters from the Pierre Bertholon to Antoine-Joseph BuissartGoogle Scholar
Correspondence and papers of Antoine Joseph Buissart concerning the lightning rod trialGoogle Scholar
Manuscripts and articles concerning the lightning rod trialGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Richard Mowery. 1994. Law, Magistracy and Crime in Old Regime Paris, 1735–1789, Vol. 1: The System of Criminal Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Keith Michael. 1975. Condorcet: From Natural Philosophy to Social Mathematics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Keith Michael. 1990. Inventing the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beccaria, Giambattista. 1753. Dell'elettricismo artificiale e naturale libri due. Turin.Google Scholar
Bell, David A. 1994. Lawyers and Citizens: The Making of a Political Elite in Old Regime France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benguigui, Isaac. n.d. Correspondance entre léabbé Nollet et le physicien génévois Jean Jallabert. Geneva.Google Scholar
Berlanstein, Lenard R. 1975. The Barristers of Toulouse in the Eighteenth Century (1740–1793). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bertholon, Pierre. 1783. Nouvelles preuves de l'efficacité des Para-tonnerres. Montpellier.Google Scholar
Buissart, Antoine Joseph. 1782. Mémoire signifié pour Me Charles Dominique de Vissery de Bois-Valé, avocat en Parlement, demeurant en la vale de Saint-Omer, défendeur et appellant, contre le Petit-Bailly de la meme ville, partie publique, demandeur et intimé. Arras.Google Scholar
Charmes, Xavier, ed. 1886. Le comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques (Histoire et documents). 3 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B. 1956. Franklin and Newton. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B. 1990. Benjamin Franklin's Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Counson, Albert. 1930. Franklin et Robespierre. Paris.Google Scholar
Darnton, Robert. 1968. Mesmerism and the End of the Enlightenment in France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine. 1988. Classical Probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine. 1991. “Marvelous Facts and Miraculous Evidence in Early Modern Europe.” In Criticial Inquiry, Vol. 18, No. 1, 93–124.Google Scholar
De Pas, Justin. 1914. Á tavers le vieux Saint Omer. Paris.Google Scholar
Dérathé, Robert. 1970. Jean-Jacques Rousseau et la science politique de son temps. Paris.Google Scholar
Des, Essarts. 1784. Causes célèbres, curieuses et intéressantes, de toutes les cours souveraines du Royaume, avec les jugements qui les ont décidées, Vol. 117. Paris.Google Scholar
Doyle, William. 1974. The Parlement of Bordeaux at the End of the Old Regime, 1771–1790. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Ford, Franklin. 1965. Robe and Sword: The Regrouping of the French Aristocracy after Louis XIV. New York: Harpers.Google Scholar
Franklin, Benjamin. 1941. Experiments and Observations on Electricity. Edited by Cohen, I.B. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Benjamin. 1959–. The Papers of Benjamin Franklin. Edited by Leonard, Labaree, William, Wilcox, Claude-Anne, Lopez, and Barbara, Oberg. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Furet, François. 1978. Penser la Revolution Francaise. Paris.Google Scholar
Grandidier, Philippe André. 1776–1778. Histoire de l'église et des evêques-princes de Strasbourg Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Grimsley, Ronald. 1974. “ The Idea of Nature in Montesquieu's Lettres Persanes.” In From Montesquieu to Laclos: Studies in the French Enlightenment. Geneva.Google Scholar
Hahn, Roger. 1971. The Anatomy of a Scientific Institution: The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666–1803. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Heilbron, J. L. 1979. Electricity in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Isambert, Decrusy and Jourdan, , eds. 1822–1833. Recueil Général des Anciennes Lois Françaises depuis l'an 420 jusqu'à la Révolution de 1789. Paris: Plon Frères.Google Scholar
Jacob, L. 1934. “Un ami de Robespierre, Buissart (d'Arras).” In Revue du Nord 20, no. 80.Google Scholar
Jessenne, Jean-Pierre, and Gilles, Deregnaucourt, Jean-Pierre, Hirsch, Hervé, Leuwers, eds. 1993. Robespierre: De la Nation artésienne à la Républiques et aux Nations. Arras.Google Scholar
Keohane, Nannerl. 1980. Philosophy and the State in France, the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lanteires, J. 1789. Essai sur le Tonnerre considéré dans ses effets moraux. Paris.Google Scholar
Lipatti, Valentin. 1974. Mémoires de Beaumarchais dans l'affaire Goezman. Paris.Google Scholar
Manent, Pierre. 1994. An Intellectual History of Liberalism. Translated by Rebecca, Balinski. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marat, Jean Paul. 1782. Recherches physiques sur l'électricité. Paris.Google Scholar
Marion, Marcel. 1923. Dictionnaire des Institutions aux XVII et XVIIIe siècles. Paris.Google Scholar
Maza, Sarah. 1993. Private Lives and Public Affairs: The Causes Célèbres of Prerevolutionary France. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Montesqiueu, Charles Secondat de. 1989 [1748]. The Spirit of the Laws. Edited and translated by Anne, M.Cohler, Basia, Carolyn Miller, and Harold, Samuel Stone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morveau, Louis Bernard Guyton de. 1777. “Tonnerre.” In Nouveau dictionnaire, pour servir de Supplément aux Dictionnaires des sciences, des arts et des métiers. Vol. 4, 948–52. Paris.Google Scholar
Morveau, Louis Bernard Guyton de. 1775. Discours publics, et Eloges. Paris.Google Scholar
Mousnier, Roland. 1979. The Institutions of France under the Absolute Monarchy 1598–1789. 2 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nollet, Jean Antoine. 1747. “ Troisième Mèmoire.” In Mémoires de l'Académie des Sciences, 230–42.Google Scholar
Nollet, Jean Antoine. 1748. “Concerning Electricity.” In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 45, 187–94.Google Scholar
Nollet, Jean Antoine. 1754. Lettres sur l'électricité. Paris.Google Scholar
Paris, J. A. 1870. La jeunesse de Robespierre. Arras.Google Scholar
Robespierre, Maximilien. 1783a. “Premier plaidoyer pour Vissery de Bois-Valé.” In Robespierre 1910, 19– 65.Google Scholar
Robespierre, Maximilien. 1783b. “ Second plaidoyer pour Vissery de Bois-Valé.” In Robespierre 1910, 66–100.Google Scholar
Robespierre, Maximilien. 1910. Oeuvres complètes. Edited by Charles, Vellay. Paris.Google Scholar
Robespierre, Maximilien. 1989. Robespierre: Ecrits. Edited by Claude, Mazauric. Paris.Google Scholar
Roche, Daniel. 1978. Le siècle des lumières en province: Académies et académiciens provinciaux, 1689–1789, 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Romas, Jacques. 1911. Oeuvres inédites de J. de Romas … avec une notice biographique et bibliographique par Paul Courteault. Edited by Bergonie, J. Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1973. The Social Contract and the Discourses. Translated and edited by Cole, G. D. H. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. [1770] 1995. The Confessions. Translated by Christopher Kelly, edited by Christopher, Kelly, Roger D, Masters and Peter G, Stillman. Hanover: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven and Simon, Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. 1987. Montesquieu. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean. [1971] 1988. Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Transparency and Obstruction. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Bailey. 1981. The Parlement of Paris, 1774–1789. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Swann, Julian. 1995. Politics and the Parlement of Paris under Louis XV, 1754–1774. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taton, René. 1964. Enseignement et diffusion des sciences en France au XVIIIe siècle. Paris.Google Scholar
Taton, René. 1986. The French Parlements and the Crisis of the Old Regime. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Torlais, Jean. 1954. Un Physicien au siècle des lumières. L'Abbé Nollet. 1700–1770. Paris.Google Scholar
Vellay, Charles. 1914. “Mélanges et documents.” In Revue historique de la Révolution Française et de l'Empire. Paris.Google Scholar
Walter, Gerard. 1961. Robespierre. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar