Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T20:01:27.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trust, Instruments, and Cross-Cultural Scientific Exchanges: Chinese Debate over the Shape of the Earth, 1600–1800

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Pingyi Chu
Pingyi Chu
Affiliation:
Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, Taiwan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the debate in China over the shape of the earth during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. The main arguments are as follows. First, trust plays an important role in knowledge transmission. Second, partial communication between different woridviews is possible. In the case of the debate over the shape of the earth, partial communication was accomplished by the spread of Western astronomical instruments and calculating tools. Third, such alien concepts as the four elements and the experience of navigation did not serve as effective cultural resources to convince Chinese literati of the sphericity of the earth. Fourth, as a result, the legitimacy of the sphericity of the earth had to be reconstructed in an alien environment. The theory of the Chinese origins of Western learning was fabricated within such a context. Fifth, debate over factual knowledge bears social and cultural implications. Thus the debate over the sphericity of the earth involved not only how the phenomenon could be understood but also how the Chinese empire was to be positioned in the new cultural atlas. Finally, the sphericity of the earth eventually became a matter of common sense for the Chinese largely because of the political and cultural transformation of modern China.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1999 , pp. 385 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle, . 1984. “On the Heavens.” In The Complete Works of Aristotle, edited by Barnes, Jonathan, 483–89. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Ching-yüan n.d. “T'i wan-kuo hsiao-t'u-hsü” (Preface to the small world map). In T'ien-hsüeh chi-chieh (Collective interpretations of the heavenly learning), edited by Ning, Liu, 3:26a–27a. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Chang, Heng. 1979. “Ling-hsian” (The spiritual constitution of the universe). In Chang He-chian-chi (Collected essays of Chang Heng). Taipei: Wen-chün ch'u-pan-she.Google Scholar
Chao, Yu-ch'in. 1983. Ke-hsianghsin-shu (A new book for calendrical studies). In Ssu-k'u ch'üan-shu (Complete collection of the Four Treasuries), vol. 786. Taipei: Shang-wu yin-shu-kuan.Google Scholar
Chiang, Hsiao-yüan. 1991. “Ming-Ch'ing chih-chi Chung-kuo-jen tui hsi-fang yü-chou mo-hsing chih yen-chiu chi t'ai-tu” (Chinese studies and attitudes toward Western cosmic models during the Ming and Ch'ing periods). In Chin-tai Chung-kuo k'o-chi-shih lun-chi (Collected essays on the history of science and technology of modern China), edited by Tsui-hua, Yang and Yi-Long, Huang, 33–53. Taipei: Modern History Institute, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Chiang, Yung. [1844] 1936. Shu-hsüeh (Mathematical learning). Shanghai: Shang-wu yin-shu-kuan.Google Scholar
Chiao, T'ien-hu. 1815. On the Spherical Earth. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Ch'ien, Pao-ts'ung. 1983. “Kai-t'ien-shuo yüan-liu-k'ao” (An investigation of the origins of the kai-t'ien theory). In Ch'ien Pao-ts'ung k'o-hsüeh-shih lun-wen hsüan-chi (Ch'ien Pao-tsung's selected essays on the history of science), 377–403. Peking: K'o-hsüeh ch'u-pan-she.Google Scholar
Chin, Tsu-meng. 1991. Chung-kuo ku-tai yü-tsou-lun (Cosmology in ancient China). Shang-hai: Hua-tung shih-fan ta-hsüeh ch'u-pan-she.Google Scholar
Ch'ing-shih-kao. 1997. (Draft History of the Ch'ing Dynasty). Taipei: Electronic Database, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Chu, Pingyi. 1994. “Technical Knowledge, Cultural Practices and Social Boundaries: Wan-nan Scholars and the Recasting of Jesuit Astronomy, 1600–1800.” Ph.D. diss., UCLA, UMI.Google Scholar
Chu, Pingyi. 1995. “Ch'eng-Chu Orthodoxy, Evidential Studies and Correlative Cosmology: Chiang Yung and Western Astronomy.” Philosophy and the History of Science — A Taiwanese Journal 4(2):71–108.Google Scholar
Chu, Pingyi. 1997. “Scientific Dispute in the Imperial Court: The 1664 Calendar Case.” Chinese Science 14:7–34.Google Scholar
Elman, Benjamin. 1984. From Philosophy to Philology. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gernet, Jacques. 1980. “Christian and Chinese Vision of the World in the Seventeenth Century.” Chinese Science 4:11–13.Google Scholar
Gernet, Jacques. 1985. China and the Christian Impact. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grant, Edward. 1994. Planets, Stars, and Orbs: Medieval Cosmos, 1200–1687. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, John B. 1986. “Ch'ing Scholars' Views of Western Astronomy.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 46(1): 121–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiung, Ming-yu. [1615] 1964. “Hsü;”(Preface to the Piao-tu shuo). In T'ien-hsüeh ch'u-han (First collection of the heavenly learning), edited by Chih-tsao, Li, 5:2523–32. Taipei: Hsüeh-sheng shu-chü.Google Scholar
Hsu, Kuang-ch'i. n.d. “T'i wan-kuo er-huan-t'u” (Preface to the World Map with Two Hemispheres). In T'ien-hsüeh chi-chieh (Collective interpretations of the heavenly learning), edited by Ning, Liu, 3:21b–23a. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Huang, Chung-chün. 1982. Ch'ou-jen chuan ssu-pian (The fourth sequel biographies of astronomers and mathematicians). Taipei: Shih-chieh shu-chü.Google Scholar
Huang, Yi-long. 1990. “T'ang Jo-wang yü Ch'ing-ch'u hsi-li chih cheng-t'ung-fa” (Adam Schall and the legitimation of the Western calendar in the early Ch'ing). In Hsin-pien Chung-kuo k'o-chi-shih (New perspectives on the history of Chinese science), edited by Chia-li, Wu and Hung-sa, Yeh, 465–90. Taipei: Yin-he wen-hua shih-yeh kung-ssu.Google Scholar
Hung, Yeh. 1936. “K'ao Li Ma-tou te shih-chieh ti-t'u” (An investigation of Ricci's World Map). Yu-kung 5 (3), 5 (4): 1–50.Google Scholar
Juan, Y¨an. 1982. Ch'ou-jen chuan (Biographies of astronomers and mathematicians). Taipei: Shih-chieh shu-chü.Google Scholar
Ku, Yen-wu. 1965. Jih-chih lu (Record of knowledge gained day by day). Taipei: Shang-wu yin-shu-kuan 30:4–5.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuo, Yung-fang. 1986. “Hsi-fang ti-yüan-shuo tsai Chung-kuo” (The Western theory of a spherical earth in China). In Chung-kuo t'ien-wen-hsüeh-shih wen-chi (Collected essays on the history of Chinese astronomy), edited by wen-chi pien-chi-tsu, Chung-kuo t'ien-wen-hsüeh-shih, 4:155–63. Peking: K'o-hsüeh ch'u-pan-she.Google Scholar
Li, Chih-ch'ao, and Hua, T'ung-hsü. 1986. “Lun Chung-kuo ku-tai te ta-ti hsing-chuang kai-nien” (On the concept of the earth in ancient China). In Tzu-jan pien-cheng-fa t'ung-hsun 5:51–55.Google Scholar
Li, Chih-tsao. n.d. “T'i wan-kuo kung-yü-t'u” (Preface to the world map). In T'ien-hsüeh chi-chieh (Collective interpretations of the heavenly learning), edited by Ning, Liu, 3:19a–20a. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Lin, Chin-shui. 1985. “Li Ma-tou shu-ju ti-yüan-hsüeh-shuo ti ying-hsiang yü i-i” (The influence and significance of the theory of the round earth transmitted by Matteo Ricci). In Wen-shih-che 170:28–34.Google Scholar
Lindberg, David C. 1992. The Beginnings of Western Science. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mei, Wen-ting. 1893. Li-hsüeh i-wen-pu (Supplement to the questions on calendrical learning). In Ssu-k'u ch'üan-shu, vol. 794. Taipei: Shang-wu yin-shu-kuan.Google Scholar
Menogon, Eugenic 1995. “Yang Guangxian's Opposition to Adam Schall: Christianity and Western Science in his Work Bude yi.” In Tsung-chiaoyü wen-hua lun-ts'ung (Essays on religion and culture), edited by Ts'un-fu, Ch'un, 246–49. Peking: Tung-fang ch'u-pan-she.Google Scholar
Needham, Joseph, and Wang, Ling. 1959. Science and Civilization in China: Mathematics and the Science of Heaven and Earth. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Willard. 1973. “Western Natural Philosophy Published in Late Ming China.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 117(4): 295–322.Google ScholarPubMed
Peterson, Willard. 1986. “Calendar Reform Prior to the Arrival of Missionaries at the Ming Court.” Ming Studies 21:43–61.Google Scholar
Ptolemy, . [1952] 1987. The Almagest. Translated by Taliaferro, R. Catesby. 29th printing. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica.Google Scholar
Ricci, Matteo. 1953. China in the Sixteenth Century: The Journals of Matthew Ricci, 1583–1610. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Ricci, Matteo. n.d.a. “T'i wan-kuo kung-yü-t'u.” (Preface to the world map). In T'ien-hsüeh chi-chieh (Collective interpretations of the heavenly learning), edited by Ning, Liu, 3:28b–29a. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Ricci, Matteo. n.d.b. “Ti-yü wan-kuo ch'üan-t'u tsung-shuo.” (General introduction to the world map). In T'ien-hsüeh chi-chieh (Collective interpretations of the heavenly learning), edited by Ning, Liu, 3:14a–18a. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Ronan Colin, A. 1961. Changing Views of the Universe. London: Scientific Book Club.Google Scholar
Russell, Jeffrey Burton. 1991. Inventing the Flat Earth: Columbus and Modern Historians. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1994a. “The Great Civility: Trust, Truth, and Moral Order.” In A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth- Century England, 3–41. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricci, Matteo. 1994b. “Knowing about People and Knowing about Things: A Moral History of Scientific Credibility.” In A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England, 243–309. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, and Simon, Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sivin, Nathan. 1969. “Cosmos and Computation in Early Chinese Mathematical Astronomy.” T'oung Pao 55.1–3: 1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ssu, Hsing-yen. 1989. “Shih-fang.” In P'ing-chün-kuan wen-kau (Essays from P'ing-chün Manor). Taipei: Hsin-wen-feng ch'u-pan-shih.Google Scholar
Sung, Hai-cheng. 1986. “Chung-kuo ku-tai ch'uang-t'ung ti-chiu-kuan shih ti-p'ing ta-ti-kuan” (The traditional concept of the earth is flat). Tzu-jan k 'o-hsüeh-shih yen-chiu 1:54–60.Google Scholar
Ursis, Sabbathin de. [1611] 1964. Chien-p'ing-yi shuo (On the Planisphere). In T'ien-hsueh ch'u-han (First collection of the heavenly learning), vol. 5, edited by Chih-tsao, Li. Taipei: Hsüeh-sheng shu-chü.Google Scholar
Ursis, Sabbathin de. [1615] 1964. Piao-tu shuo (On the Gnomon). In T'ien-hsüeh ch'u-han (First collection of the heavenly learning) vol. 5, edited by Chih-tsao, Li. Taipei: Hsüeh-sheng shu-chü.Google Scholar
Verbiest, Ferdinand. [1669] 1965. Pu-te-I pien (I cannot help rebutting). In T'ien-chu-chiao tung-ch'uan wen-hsien hsü-pien (Documents on the transmission of Christianity to the East), ser. 2. vol. 3, edited by Hsiang-hsiang, Wu. Taipei: Hsüeh-sheng shu-chü.Google Scholar
Walravens, Hartmut. 1991. “Father Verbiest's Chinese World Map (1647).” Imago Mundi 43:31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Fu-chih. 1972. Ssu-wanlu wai-pien (Records of pondering and questioning). In Ch'uang-shan yi-shu ch'üan-chi (Complete bequeathed works of Ch'uang-shan). Taipei: Tzu-yu ch'u-pan-she.Google Scholar
Wu, Chung-ming. n.d. “T'i wan-kuo kung-yu-t'u” (Preface to the world map). In T'ien-hsüeh chi-chieh (Collective interpretations of the heavenly learning), edited by Ning, Liu, 3:23b–24a. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Yang, Ching-ch'un. n.d. “T'i wan-kuo kung-yu-t'u.”(Preface to the world map). In T'ien-hsüeh chi-chieh (Collective interpretations of the heavenly learning), edited by Ning, Liu, 3:24b–26a. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Yang, Kuang-hsien. 1965. Pu-te-i (I cannot do otherwise). In T'ien-chu-chiao tung-ch 'uan wen-hsien hsü-pien (Documents on the transmission of Christianity to the East), ser. 2. vol. 3, edited by Hsiang-hsiang, Wu. Taipei: Hsüeh-sheng shu-chü.Google Scholar
Yung, Jung. 1965. Ssu-k'u ch'uan-shu tsung-mu t'i-yao (Introduction to the catalog of the complete collection of the Four Treasuries). Taipei: Shang-wu yin-shu-kuan.Google Scholar
Yüan-shih. 1997. (Yuan dynastic history). Taipeh: Electronic Database, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar