No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Validity: A Reappraisal
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
Extract
Some years ago I published an article on this topic where more details can be found on what I may call analytic aspects concerning validity.page 1 But in the intervening years the attitude of many has indicated a willingness to consider change on this matter. Amongst Anglicans there seem fewer ministerial fundamentalists. Also a Roman Catholic has pointed out that in 1896 when Anglican orders were declared invalid Roman Catholic theologians were divided amongst themselves and today a leading Roman Catholic has said that he would like to see the matter reviewed.page 2 Indeed Roman references to ‘ecclesial communities’ and to penitence for their share in the divisions of the Church may be a hopeful sign and ease the way for a review of their attitude to validity and claim to be the one and only true church.page 3
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1969
References
page 175 note 1 Scottish Journal of Theology, vol. 15.2, June 1962, pp. 124–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 175 note 2 Hughes, J. J. in Journal of Ecumenical Studies, vol. 4.1.Google Scholar
page 175 note 3 Vatican II Decree of Ecumenism III. 14.
page 175 note 4 See Kittel, Wörterbuch; Ignatius ad Smyr. 8.
page 175 note 5 The Doctrines of Ministerial Order (Clark, 1940), pp. 229f, 249.Google Scholar
page 176 note 1 Leeming, B., Principles of Sacramental Theology (new ed. 1966), pp. 243, 270f.Google Scholar
page 176 note 2 G. W. L. Lampe, Lexicon of Patristic Greek; Greenslade, S. L., Schism in the Early Church (S.C.M. Press, 1953), esp. chs. 8, 9, 11.Google Scholar
page 176 note 3 Quick, O. C., The Christian Sacraments (1936 reprint), pp. 135ffGoogle Scholar; Swete, H. B., The Early History of the Church and Ministry (2nd ed. 1921), esp. chs. 3, 4.Google Scholar
page 176 note 4 op. cit., p. 178, and op. cit., pp. 144, ff
page 177 note 1 See The Old and the New in the Church, esp. Appendix 4 (S.C.M. Press, 1961).Google Scholar
page 177 note 2 Lacey, T. A., Unity and Schism (Mowbray, 1917)Google Scholar; O. C. Quick, op. cit.
page 177 note 3 e.g. Statements of Vatican II and those of Lambeth Conferences.
page 177 note 4 Theology, Oct. 1952, and Scottish Journal of Theology, June 1962.
page 177 note 5 Davies, J. G., The Spirit, the Church and the Sacraments (Faith Press, 1954), pp. 166 and 176.Google Scholar
page 177 note 6 Panagolous, J. in Journal of Ecumenical Studies, IV. I, pp. 38, 41.Google Scholar
page 178 note 1 Quick, op. cit., p. 144.
page 178 note 2 op. cit., p. 146.
page 178 note 3 pp. 13Iff, 154ff.
page 178 note 4 RevWhite, G., Scottish Journal of Theology, vol. 20.I, March 1967, pp. 50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 178 note 5 Quick, op. cit., pp. 143ff, and Davies, op. cit., pp. 175f 191f.
page 178 note 6 Lambeth Conference Appeal 1920.
page 178 note 7 Davies, op. cit., p. 172.
page 179 note 1 W. Temple, Address to Canterbury Convocation May 1943, and Davies, op. cit., p. 173f.
page 179 note 2 Quick, op. cit., p. 144.
page 179 note 3 See also my article in Scottish Journal of Theology, vol. 15.2, June 1962, p. 128f.Google Scholar
page 179 note 4 Peck, A. L., Anglicanism and Episcopacy, 1958, p. 84.Google Scholar
page 180 note 1 For detail e.g. Hebert's, A. G. chapter in theApostolic Ministry, 1940Google Scholar; Manson, T. W., The Ministry of the Church (Westminster Press, U.S.A., 1948)Google Scholar; Archbishop Temple, op. cit.
page 180 note 2 Moberly, G., The Administration of the Holy Spirit in the Body of Christ (Parker, 1868), esp. ch. 5. 1 Cor. 12 passim, 2 Tim. 1.6.Google Scholar
page 180 note 3 Kittel, op. cit., in loc.; e.g. 1 Cor. 1.8.
page 180 note 4 Oman, J., Grace and Personality (C.U.P., 1931).Google Scholar
page 180 note 5 Davies, op. cit., pp. 173f 177; Ainslie, op. cit., p. 228; Quick, op. cit., p. 243f.
page 180 note 6 op. cit., p. 278.
page 181 note 1 Smith, H. Maynard, Frank, Bishop of Zanzibar (S.P.C.K., 1926), p. 234.Google Scholar
page 182 note 1 Covenant and Reconciliation (Mowbray, 1967), p. 5.Google Scholar
page 182 note 2 cf. Wiles, M. F., The Making of Christian Doctrine (C.U.P., 1967), pp. 6f, 9, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar