Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 14
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Dibao-Dina, Clarisse Caille, Agnès and Giraudeau, Bruno 2015. Soin et recherche sont-ils éthiquement compatibles ?. La Presse Médicale, Vol. 44, Issue. 10, p. 986.

    Prost, Audrey Binik, Ariella Abubakar, Ibrahim Roy, Anjana De Allegri, Manuela Mouchoux, Christelle Dreischulte, Tobias Ayles, Helen Lewis, James J. and Osrin, David 2015. Logistic, ethical, and political dimensions of stepped wedge trials: critical review and case studies. Trials, Vol. 16, Issue. 1,

    Gelfand, S. 2013. Clinical Equipoise: Actual or Hypothetical Disagreement?. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol. 38, Issue. 6, p. 590.

    Henschel, Andreas Dirk Rothenberger, Lillian Geza Schrey, Dominik Gerß, Joachim Hempel, Georg and Boos, Joachim 2013. Risk and benefit from clinical trials in minors: Making the case for transparent and consistent publications. Open Journal of Pediatrics, Vol. 03, Issue. 02, p. 151.

    Binik, Ariella Weijer, Charles McRae, Andrew D Grimshaw, Jeremy M Boruch, Robert Brehaut, Jamie C Donner, Allan Eccles, Martin P Saginur, Raphael Taljaard, Monica and Zwarenstein, Merrick 2011. Does clinical equipoise apply to cluster randomized trials in health research?. Trials, Vol. 12, Issue. 1,

    Chambers, David W. 2011. Confusions in the equipoise concept and the alternative of fully informed overlapping rational decisions. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, Vol. 14, Issue. 2, p. 133.

    de Vries, Martine C Houtlosser, Mirjam Wit, Jan M Engberts, Dirk P Bresters, Dorine Kaspers, Gertjan JL and van Leeuwen, Evert 2011. Ethical issues at the interface of clinical care and research practice in pediatric oncology: a narrative review of parents' and physicians' experiences. BMC Medical Ethics, Vol. 12, Issue. 1,

    Rodrigues, H. C. M. L. Deprest, J. and Berg, P. P. v. d. 2011. When referring physicians and researchers disagree on equipoise: the TOTAL trial experience. Prenatal Diagnosis, Vol. 31, Issue. 6, p. 589.

    Schlichting, Douglas E. 2010. Destabilizing the ‘equipoise’ framework in clinical trials: prioritizing non-exploitation as an ethical framework in clinical research. Nursing Philosophy, Vol. 11, Issue. 4, p. 271.

    Barfield, Raymond C. and Kodish, Eric 2009. Oncology of Infancy and Childhood.

    Hansson, Sven Ove 2006. Uncertainty and the Ethics of Clinical Trials. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, Vol. 27, Issue. 2, p. 149.

    2006. Writing Clinical Research Protocols.

    Iltis, Ana 2005. Timing Invitations to Participate in Clinical Research: Preliminary versus Informed Consent. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol. 30, Issue. 1, p. 89.

    Ove hansson, Sven 2004. Weighing Risks and Benefits. Topoi, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 145.



  • Robert M. Veatch (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 July 2002

The physician who upholds the Hippocratic oath is supposed to be loyal to his or her patients. This requires choosing only the therapy that the physician believes is best for the patient. However, knowing what is best requires randomized clinical trials. Thus, clinicians must be willing to recruit their patients to be assigned at random to one of two therapies (or perhaps to a therapy or a placebo) in order to determine which is best based on the highest standards of pharmacological science.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Philosophy and Policy
  • ISSN: 0265-0525
  • EISSN: 1471-6437
  • URL: /core/journals/social-philosophy-and-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *