Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:38:40.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Legacy of Austerity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2020

Zoë Irving*
Affiliation:
University of York, UK E-mail: zoe.irving@york.ac.uk

Abstract

In considering the impact of austerity, much attention has been focused on the immediate effects of public spending cuts and on documenting the resulting increase in hardship and unmet needs. However, in calculating the consequences of austerity for the welfare state, it is its enduring legacy that is equally important. This article examines the proposition that the indirect effects of austerity on social, economic and political relations are as significant for the welfare of future generations as the ‘decade of austerity’ has been for contemporary welfare. The analysis draws on the approach adopted by Paul Wilding (1992) reflecting on the 1980s as the ‘decade of Thatcherism’. Wilding’s ten legacies are recategorised across four dimensions: normalising a non-commitment to welfare, societal scarring, refuelling the race to the bottom and diminishing the political capacity for change. The conclusions suggest that austerity will abide in the social and political relations of welfare long after austerity measures have ceased.

Type
Themed Section: A Hostile Decade for Social Policy: Economic Crisis, Political Crisis and Austerity 2010-20
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, G. and Zayed, Y. (2019) Hate Crime Statistics, House of Commons Library Briefing Paper No. 08537, 28 March 2019, London: House of Commons Library.Google Scholar
Basu, S., Carney, M. and Kenworthy, N. (2017) ‘Ten years after the financial crisis: The long reach of austerity and its global impacts on health’, Social Science and Medicine, 187, 203–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BEIS (2019) Trade Union Membership: Statistical Bulletin, London: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 30 May, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/805268/trade-union-membership-2018-statistical-bulletin.pdf [accessed 02.03.2020].Google Scholar
Blyth, M. (2013) Austerity, the History of a Dangerous Idea, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cantillon, B., Chzhen, Y., Handa, S. and Nolan, B. (2017) Children of Austerity: Impact of the Great Recession on Child Poverty in Rich Countries, Oxford: UNICEF and Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, F. (ed.) (1989) The Comparative History of Public Policy, Cambridge: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Castles, F. (2004) The Future of the Welfare State: Crisis Myths and Crisis Realities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for Public Integrity (2019) The Secret Saga of Trump’s Tax Cuts, April 30 https://publicintegrity.org/business/taxes/trumps-tax-cuts/the-secret-saga-of-trumps-tax-cuts/ [accessed 20.11.2019].Google Scholar
Crawley, H. and Skleparis, D. (2018) ‘Refugees, migrants, neither, both: categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe’s ‘migration crisis”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 1, 4864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espiet-Kilty, R. (2015) ‘The legacy of Thatcherism in question: an introduction’, Observatoire de la société britannique [online], 17 http://journals.openedition.org/osb/1757.Google Scholar
Eurofound (2016) Eurofound Yearbook 2015: Living and Working in Europe, Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
Eurofound (2019) Challenges and Prospects in the EU: Quality of Life and Public Services, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, K. and Irving, Z. (2012) ‘Varieties of crisis, varieties of austerity: social policy in challenging times’, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 20, 2, 135–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnsworth, K. and Irving, Z. (2015) ‘Austerity: more than the sum of its parts’, in Farnsworth, K. and Irving, Z. (eds.), Social Policy in Times of Austerity: Global Economic Crisis and the New Politics of Welfare, Bristol, Policy Press, 941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnsworth, K. and Irving, Z. (2018) ‘Austerity: neoliberal dreams come true?’, Critical Social Policy, 38, 3, 461–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrall, S. and Hay, C. (eds.) (2014) The Legacy of Thatcherism: Assessing and Exploring Thatcherite Social and Economic Policies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Financial Times (2019) ‘Europe turns on spending taps as austerity comes to an end’, 10 February.Google Scholar
Flora, P. and Heidenheimer, A. J. (eds.) (2005) The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Gallie, D. and Paugam, S. (eds.) (2000) Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gamble, A. (2016) Can the Welfare State Survive?, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Gangl, M. (2004) ‘Welfare states and the scar effects of unemployment: a comparative analysis of the United States and West Germany’, American Journal of Sociology, 109, 6, 1319–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. and LeGrand, J. (eds.) (1987) Not only the Poor, The Middle Classes and the Welfare State, London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Gough, I. (1979) The Political Economy of the Welfare State, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, M. and Barford, A. (2018) ‘The depths of the cuts: the uneven geography of local government austerity’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11, 3, 541–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D. (2007) A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hastings, T. and Heyes, J. (2018) ‘Farewell to flexicurity? Austerity and labour policies in the European Union’, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 39, 3, 458–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, J., Sefton, T. and Stewart, K. (eds.) (2009) Towards a More Equal Society? Poverty, Inequality and Policy since 1997, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
ILO/OECD (2018) The Global Deal for Decent Work and Inclusive Growth Flagship Report 2018: Building Trust in a Changing World of Work, May 2018, Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
ILO (2020) ILOStat, Statistics on Unemployment and Supplementary Measures of Labour Underutilization 1996-2020 – Time-related Underemployment Rate by Sex and Age (%) Annual [Data File], https://www.ilo.org/shinyapps/bulkexplorer30/?lang=en&segment=indicator&id=TRU_DEMP_SEX_AGE_RT_A [accessed 05.03.2020].Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. F. and Norris, P. (2016) Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash, July 29, HKS Working Paper No. RWP16-026, SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2818659 [accessed 06.03.2020].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Insurance Europe (2019) European Insurance in Figures, 2017 Data, Brussels: Insurance Europe, https://www.insuranceeurope.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/European%20Insurance%20in%20Figures%20-%202017%20data.pdf [accessed 09.03.2020].Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (2015) ‘Neo-liberalism, finance-dominated accumulation, and enduring austerity: a cultural political economy perspective’, in Farnsworth, K. and Irving, Z. (eds.), Social Policy in Times of Austerity: Global Economic Crisis and the New Politics of Welfare, Bristol: Policy Press, 87112.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. (2019) ‘Opening remarks to Party Manifesto Analysis’, https://www.ifs.org.uk/election/2019/manifestos [accessed 05.12.2019].Google Scholar
Kharas, H. and Hamel, K. (2018) ‘A global tipping point: half the world is now middle class or wealthier’, Future Development Blog, World Bank/Brookings Institute, https://www.brookings.edu/blog/future-development/2018/09/27/a-global-tipping-point-half-the-world-is-now-middle-class-or-wealthier/ [accessed 19.06.2019].Google Scholar
Koch, I., Fransham, M., Cant, S., Ebrey, J., Glucksberg, L. and Savage, M. (2019) Social Polarisation at the Local Level: A Four-Town Comparative Study, Working Paper (37), International Inequalities Institute, London: London School of Economics and Political Science, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/102216/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (1998) ‘The paradox of redistribution: welfare state institutions and poverty in the western countries’, American Sociological Review, 63, 5, 661–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laird, J. (2017) ‘Public sector employment inequality in the United States and the great recession’, Demography, 54, 391411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, C. A. (2008) ‘The institutional logic of welfare attitudes: how welfare regimes influence public support’, Comparative Political Studies, 41, 2, 145–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layte, R. and Whelan, C. T. (2002) ‘Cumulative disadvantage or individualisation? A comparative analysis of poverty risk and incidence’, European Societies, 4, 2, 209–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layte, R. and Whelan, C. T. (2003) ‘Moving in and out of poverty’, European Societies, 5, 2, 167–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmot, M., Allen, J., Boyce, T., Goldblatt, P. and Morrison, J. (2020) Health Equity in England: The Marmot Review 10 Years On, London: Institute of Health Equity.Google Scholar
McBride, S. and Evans, B. (eds.) (2017) The Austerity State, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, P. (2019) ‘Perceptions of regional inequality and the geography of discontent: insights from the UK’, Regional Studies, doi: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1619928.Google Scholar
Messenger, J. and Wallot, P. (2015) The Diversity of “Marginal” Part-time Employment, INWORK Policy Brief No.7, May, Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Ocampo, J. A. and Stiglitz, J. (eds.) (2018) The Welfare State Revisited, New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2019a) ‘Preferences for social policy’, in Society at a Glance 2019: OECD Social Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
OECD (2019b) Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en [accessed 04.03.2020].Google Scholar
OECD (2019c) Government at a Glance 2019, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/8ccf5c38-en [accessed 04.03.2020].Google Scholar
OECD (2019d), Under Pressure: The Squeezed Middle Class, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/689afed1-en [accessed 19.06.2019].Google Scholar
OECD (2020a) Public Spending on Labour Markets (Indicator), doi: 10.1787/911b8753-en [accessed 04.03.2020].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2020b) Public Spending on Education (Indicator), doi: 10.1787/f99b45d0-en [accessed 04.03.2020].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, A., Clery, E., Curtice, J., Phillips, M. and Utting, D. (eds.) (2012) British Social Attitudes: The 29th Report, London: NatCen Social Research, www.bsa-29.natcen.ac.uk [accessed 26.02.2020].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, S. and Matsaganis, M. (2018) ‘The political economy of austerity in Southern Europe’, New Political Economy, 23, 2, 192207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuters (2019) ‘Argentina’s Peronist left returns as Fernandez is sworn in’, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-argentina-politics-inauguration/argentinas-peronist-left-returns-as-fernandez-sworn-in-to-power-idUSKBN1YE128 [accessed 10.12.2019].Google Scholar
Schumacher, G. and van Kersbergen, K. (2016) ‘Do mainstream parties adapt to the welfare chauvinism of populist parties?’, Party Politics, 22, 3, 300–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwab, C., Bouckaert, G. and Kuhlmann, S. (eds.) (2017) The Future of Local Government in Europe: Lessons from Research and Practice in 31 Countries, Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv941qjd.1 [accessed 02.03.2020].Google Scholar
Standing, G. (2014) ‘The precariat: from denizens to citizens’, Polity, 44, 4, 588608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, W. (2017) How will Capitalism End?, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Stuckler, D. and Basu, S. (2013) The Body Economic, Eight Experiments in Economic Recovery form Iceland to Greece, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Taylor, E., Saunders, C. and Toomse-Smith, M. (2017) Social and Political Attitudes of People on Low Incomes 2017 Report, Joseph Rowntree Foundation London: NatCen Social Research.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2016) ‘The divisive welfare state’, Social Policy and Administration, 50, 6, 712–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titmuss, R. (1968) Commitment to Welfare, London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tumino, A. (2015) The Scarring Effect of Unemployment from the Early ‘90s to the Great Recession, ISER Working Paper Series, No. 2015-05, University of Essex, Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER).Google Scholar
van Kersbergen, K. (2000) ‘The declining resistance of welfare states to change?’, in Kuhnle, S. (ed.), Survival of the European Welfare State, London: Routledge, 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kersbergen, K., Vis, B. and Hemerijck, A. (2014) ‘The Great Recession and welfare state reform: is retrenchment really the only game left in town?’, Social Policy and Administration, 48, 7, 883904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, J., Wulaningsih, W., Da Zhou, C., Marshall, D., Sylianteng, G., Dela Rosa, P., Miguel, V. Raine, R., King, L. and Maruthappu, M. (2017) ‘Effects of health and social care spending constraints on mortality in England: a time trend analysis’, BMJ Open 7:e017722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittaker, M. (2019) The Shape of Things to Come, Charting the Changing Size and Shape of the UK State, London: Resolution Foundation.Google Scholar
WHO (2018) Can People Afford to Pay for Health Care in the United Kingdom?, World Health Organisation, Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
Wilding, P. (1992) ‘The British welfare state: Thatcherism’s enduring legacy’, Policy and Politics, 20, 3, 201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilensky, H. (2002) Rich Democracies, Political Economy, Public Policy and Performance, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, F. (2015) ‘Towards the welfare commons: contestation, critique and criticality in social policy’, in Irving, Z., Fenger, M. and Hudson, J. (eds.), Social Policy Review 27: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar