Skip to main content
×
Home

Early Intervention and Evidence-Based Policy and Practice: Framing and taming

  • Rosalind Edwards (a1), Val Gillies (a2) and Nicola Horsley (a3)
Abstract

In this article, we highlight some critical matters in the way that an issue is framed as a problem in policymaking and the consequent means of taming that problem, in focussing on the use and implications of neuroscientific discourse of brain claims in early intervention policy and practice. We draw on three sets of analyses: of the contradictory set of motifs framing the state of ‘evidence’ of what works in intervention in the early years; of the (mis)use of neuroscientific discourse to frame deficient parenting as causing inequalities and support particular policy directions; and of the way that early years practitioners adopt brain claims to tame the problem of deficient parenting. We argue that using expedient brain claims as a framing and taming justification is entrenching gendered and classed understandings and inequalities.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Allen G. (2011a) Early Intervention: The Next Steps – An Independent Report to Her Majesty's Government, London: Cabinet Office.
Allen G. (2011b) Early Intervention: Smart Investment, Massive Savings – The Second Independent Report to Her Majesty's Government, London: Cabinet Office.
Barlow J. and Axford N. (2014) ‘Giving children a better start in life: from science to policy and practice’ (guest editorial), Journal of Children's Services, 9, 2, http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/JCS-04-2014-0025 [accessed 22.01.2015].
Bruer J. T. (1999) The Myth of the First Three Years: A New Understanding of Early Brain Development and Lifelong Learning, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Davies B. (2003) ‘Death to critique and dissent? The policies and practices of New Managerialism and of “evidence-based practice”’, Gender and Education, 15, 1, 91103.
Edwards R., Gillies V. and Horsley N. (2016, forthcoming) Early Intervention: Who's ‘Saving’ Children and Why, Bristol: The Policy Press.
Featherstone B., Morris K. and White S. (2013) ‘A marriage made in hell: early intervention meets child protection’, in Wastell D., White S. and Lorek A. (eds.), The Child's Timeframe – a Neuro Scientific Perspective, London: 14 Grays Inn Square, pp. 3044.
Gee J. P. (2012) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method, 3rd edn, London: Routledge.
Gerhardt S. (2004) Why Love Matters: How Affection Shapes a Baby's Brain, Hove: Brunner-Routledge.
Gibson B. (2003) ‘Framing and taming “wicked” problems’, in Lin V. and Gibson B. (eds.), Evidence-Based Health Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 298310.
Greenhalgh T. and Russell J. (2009) ‘Evidence based policy making: a critique’, Perspectives on Biology and Medicine, 52, 2, 304–18.
Gregg D. (2010) Family Intervention Projects: A Classic Case of Policy-Based Evidence, London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.
Hammersley M. (2001) ‘Some questions about evidence-based practice in education’, in Pring R. and Thomas G. (eds.), Evidence-Based Practice in Education, Milton Keynes: Open University Press, pp. 133–49.
HM Government (2013) What Works: Evidence Centres for Social Policy, London: Cabinet Office, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/136227/What_Works_publication.pdf [accessed 28.07.14].
Irwin L. G., Siddiqi A. and Hertzman C. (2007) Early Child Development: Powerful Equalizer [emphasis in original title], Geneva: World Health Organisation.
Kinsley C. H. and Franssen R. A. (2010) ‘The pregnant brain as a revving race car: mothers-to-be get better at recognizing emotions’, Scientific American, 19 January, http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/pregnant-brain-as-racecar/ [accessed 28.07.2014].
Leadsom A., Field F., Burstow P. and Lucas C. (2013) 1001 Critical Days: The Importance of the Conception to Age Two Period, http://www.andrealeadsom.com/downloads/1001cdmanifesto.pdf [accessed 28.07.2014].
Macvarish J., Lee E. J. and Lowe P. K. (2014) ‘The “first three years” movement and the infant brain: a review of critiques’, Sociology Compass, 8, 6, 792804.
Marcus G. (2012) ‘Neuroscience fiction’, The New Yorker, 30 November, http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/neuroscience-fiction?currentPage=all [accessed 28.07.2014].
Marston G. and Watts R. (2003) ‘Tampering with the evidence: a critical appraisal of evidence-based policy-making’, The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 3, 3, 143–63.
McDonald C. (2003) ‘Forward via the past? Evidence-based practice as strategy in social work’, The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 3, 3, 123–42.
Rose N. (1999) ‘Inventiveness in politics’, Economy and Society, 28, 3, 470–86.
Rose N. and Abi-Rached J. (2013) Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind, New York: Princeton University Press.
Schmitz S. and Höppner G. (2014) ‘Neurofeminism and feminist neurosciences: a critical review of contemporary brain research’, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 546, journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00546/pdf [accessed 28.07.2014].
Smith K. (2013) Beyond Evidence-Based Policy in Public Health: The Interplay of Ideas, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Solesbury W. (2001) Evidence Based Policy: Whence It Came and Where It's Going, Working Paper 1, ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, London: Queen Mary University of London, http://www.lgsp.uz/old/publications/option_paper_training/ebp_when_it_came_and_where_it_is_going_eng.pdf [accessed 23.7.2014].
Trinder L. (2000) ‘Introduction: the context of evidence-based practice’, in Trinder L. with Reynolds S. (eds.), Evidence-Based Practice: A Critical Appraisal, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 116.
Wall G. (2010) ‘Mothers’ experiences with intensive parenting and brain development discourse’, Women's Studies International Forum, 33, 3, 253–63.
Wastell D. and White S. (2013) ‘Blinded by neuroscience: social policy, the family and the infant brain’, in Wastell D., White S. and Lorek A. (eds.), The Child's Timeframe – a Neuro Scientific Perspective, London: 14 Grays Inn Square, pp. 1229.
Westminster Social Policy Forum (2013) Early Intervention: Joining Up Services, Targeting Support and the Role of the Foundation, London: Westminster Forum.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Policy and Society
  • ISSN: 1474-7464
  • EISSN: 1475-3073
  • URL: /core/journals/social-policy-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 15
Total number of PDF views: 156 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 530 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.