Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 32
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Chaney, Paul 2016. Gendered political space: civil society, contingency theory, and the substantive representation of women. Journal of Civil Society, Vol. 12, Issue. 2, p. 198.

    Dreger, Stefanie Gerlinger, Thomas and Bolte, Gabriele 2016. Gender inequalities in mental wellbeing in 26 European countries: do welfare regimes matter?. The European Journal of Public Health, p. ckw074.

    Podestà, Federico and Marzadro, Sonia 2016. Operationalizing De-commodification and De-familization Outcomes via the Relative Poverty Approach: An Application to Western European Countries. Social Indicators Research,

    Buhr, Daniel and Stoy, Volquart 2015. More than just Welfare Transfers? A Review of the Scope of Esping-Andersen's Welfare Regime Typology. Social Policy and Society, Vol. 14, Issue. 02, p. 271.

    Grady, Jo 2015. Gendering Pensions: Making Women Visible. Gender, Work & Organization, Vol. 22, Issue. 5, p. 445.

    Heijstra, Thamar Bjarnason, Thoroddur and Rafnsdóttir, Gudbjörg Linda 2015. Predictors of Gender Inequalities in the Rank of Full Professor. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 59, Issue. 2, p. 214.

    Kim, Ki-tae 2015. From Worlds to Cases: Case Selection and ‘Other Worlds’ in the Welfare Modelling Business. Social Policy and Society, Vol. 14, Issue. 02, p. 309.

    Yu, Sam Chau, C.M. and Lee, K.M. 2015. Using defamilisation typologies to study the Confucian welfare regime. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, Vol. 31, Issue. 1, p. 74.

    Calnan, Michael 2014. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society.

    Stoy, Volquart 2014. Worlds of Welfare Services: From Discovery to Exploration. Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 48, Issue. 3, p. 343.

    An, Mi-Young 2013. Childcare Expansion in East Asia: Changing Shape of the Institutional Configurations in Japan and South Korea. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, Vol. 7, Issue. 1, p. 28.

    Ferragina, Emanuele Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin and Tomlinson, Mark 2013. Unemployment Protection and Family Policy at the Turn of the 21st Century: A Dynamic Approach to Welfare Regime Theory. Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 47, Issue. 7, p. 783.

    Heijstra, Thamar M. O'Connor, Pat and Rafnsdóttir, Gudbjörg Linda 2013. Explaining gender inequality in Iceland: what makes the difference?. European Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 3, Issue. 4, p. 324.

    Kim, Jin Wook and Choi, Young Jun 2013. Feminisation of poverty in 12 welfare states: Consolidating cross-regime variations?. International Journal of Social Welfare, Vol. 22, Issue. 4, p. 347.

    Strandh, Mattias Hammarström, Anne Nilsson, Karina Nordenmark, Mikael and Russel, Helen 2013. Unemployment, gender and mental health: the role of the gender regime. Sociology of Health & Illness, Vol. 35, Issue. 5, p. 649.

    Van Tuyckom, Charlotte 2013. Six sporting worlds. A cluster analysis of sports participation in the EU-25. Quality & Quantity, Vol. 47, Issue. 1, p. 441.

    Clouston, Sean A.P. and Quesnel-Vallée, Amélie 2012. The role of defamilialization in the relationship between partnership and self-rated health: A cross-national comparison of Canada and the United States. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 75, Issue. 8, p. 1342.

    HUDSON, JOHN 2012. Welfare Regimes and Global Cities: A Missing Link in the Comparative Analysis of Welfare States?. Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 41, Issue. 03, p. 455.

    Keck,, Wolfgang and Saraceno, Chiara 2012. Multilinks Database on Intergenerational Policy Indicators. Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 132, Issue. 3, p. 453.

    Kim, Il-Ho Muntaner, Carles Vahid Shahidi, Faraz Vives, Alejandra Vanroelen, Christophe and Benach, Joan 2012. Welfare states, flexible employment, and health: A critical review. Health Policy, Vol. 104, Issue. 2, p. 99.


The worlds of welfare: illusory and gender blind?

  • Clare Bambra (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 July 2004

The nature of welfare state regimes has been an ongoing debate within the comparative social policy literature since the publication of Esping-Andersen's The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (1990). This paper engages with two aspects of this debate; the gender critique of Esping-Andersen's thesis, and Kasza's (2002) assertions about the ‘illusory nature’ of welfare state regimes. It presents a gender-focused defamilisation index and contrasts it with Esping-Andersen's decommodification index to illustrate that, whilst individual welfare states have been shown to exhibit internal variety across different policy areas, they are both consistent and coherent in terms of their policy variation by gender. It concludes, in contrast to both the gender critique of Esping-Andersen, and Kasza's rejection of the regimes concept, that the ‘worlds of welfare’ approach is therefore neither gender blind or illusory, and can, if limited to the analysis of specific areas such as labour market decommodification or defamilisation, be resurrected as a useful means of organising and classifying welfare states.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Policy and Society
  • ISSN: 1474-7464
  • EISSN: 1475-3073
  • URL: /core/journals/social-policy-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *