Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-r4dm2 Total loading time: 0.18 Render date: 2021-09-21T08:37:24.712Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Research Participation Improves Student's Exam Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Beatriz Gil-Gómez de Liaño*
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain)
Orfelio G. León
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain)
David Pascual-Ezama
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
*Corresponding
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Beatriz Gil-Gómez de Liaño. Dpto. Psicología Social y Metodología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. C/ Ivan Pavlov, 6, 28049 Madrid (Spain). Email: bgil.gomezdelianno@uam.es

Abstract

Although there have been several attempts to explore for beneficial effects of research participation in social sciences, most of them have mainly explored satisfaction and students learning perceptions (e.g., Bowman & Waite, 2003). Very few works have studied learning by measuring exam performance. Moreover, participation has been usually conceptualized as a mixture of active and passive participation, including in the same measure different practices such as filling up questionnaires, running experiments or reading and answering questions about a journal article or a scientific conference. The present work tries to determine if there is an advantage due to research participation comparing exam performance, satisfaction and perceived learning of the matter Research Methods in Psychology, in three different groups (non-participating, passive and active participating). As we can see in the results, the mere participation benefits exam performance. Results are discussed in terms of the use of research participation as a new powerful active method in education.

Aunque ha habido varios intentos por estudiar los posibles efectos beneficiosos de la participación en investigaciones en ciencias sociales, la mayoría de ellos han estudiado la satisfacción y la percepción de aprendizaje de los alumnos (e.g., Bowman & Waite, 2003), y muy pocos trabajos han tomado medidas del rendimiento en los exámenes. Además, la participación ha sido habitualmente conceptualizada como una mezcla entre participación activa y pasiva, incluyendo en la misma medida prácticas muy distintas tales como rellenar cuestionarios, pasar experimentos o leer y responder a una serie de cuestiones sobre un artículo o una conferencia científica. El presente trabajo pretende determinar si existe beneficio en el rendimiento en un examen, la satisfacción y el aprendizaje percibido por los alumnos en la materia de Métodos de investigación en psicología, en tres grupos distintos (grupo de no participación, participación pasiva y participación activa) gracias a la participación en una investigación en psicología. Como se puede ver en los resultados, la mera participación beneficia la ejecución en el examen. Los resultados son discutidos en términos del uso de la participación de nuestros estudiantes en investigaciones, como un nuevo y potente método activo de educación.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barr, R., & Tagg, J. (1995). A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change: The magazine of Higher Learning, November/December. Heldref Publications.Google Scholar
Bowman, L. L., & Waite, B. M. (2003). Volunteering in research: Student satisfaction and educational benefits. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 102106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP3002_03CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, B. K. (1979). Ethical and educational aspects of participating as a subject in psychology experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 6, 195198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top0604_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. C. (2008). Enhancing self-perceived effects using Web-based portfolio assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 17531771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, E. K., Rhee, J. A., Baik, Y. H., & Os, A. (2009). The effect of team based learning in medical ethics education. Medical Teacher, 31, 10131017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01421590802590553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulter, X. (1986). Academic value of research participation by undergraduates. American Psychologist, 41, 317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.41.3.317.aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling, J., Goedert, K., Ceynar, M., Shore, W., & Anderson, D. (2007). Learning about the means to the end: What US Introductory Psychology students report about experimental participation. Psychology, Learning and Teaching, 6, 9197. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/plat.2007.6.2.91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diseth, Å., Pallesen, S., Brunborg, G. S., & Larsen, S. (2010). Academic achievement among first semester undergraduate psychology students: the role of course experience, effort, motives and learning strategies. Higher Education, 59, 335352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9251-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365395). Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Elliott, L. J., Rice, S., Trafimow, D., Madson, L., & Hipshur, M. F. (2010). Research participation versus classroom lecture: a comparison of student learning. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 129131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00986281003626862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, H., & Yarden, A. (2009). “Here the scientists explain what I said.” Coordination practices elirefd during the enactment of the results and discussion sections of adapted primary literature. Research in Science Education, 39, 349383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9114-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, M. V., Alvarado, J. M., & Jiménez, A. (2000). La predicción del rendimiento académico: regresión lineal versus regresión logística. [The prediction of academic performance: linear regression versus logistic regression] Psicothema, 12, 248252.Google Scholar
Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009).Learning, teaching and scholarship in a digital age. Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38, 246259. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09336671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hapgood, S., Magnusson, S. J., & Palinscar, A. S. (2004). Teacher, text, and experience: A case of young children's scientific inquiry. The Journal of the Learning of Sciences, 13, 455505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1304_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, J. D., Hurst, R. S., & Keely, E. J. (1996).Relacionship between learner attitudes, prior achievement, and performance in a general education course: A multi-institutional study. International Journal of Instructional Media, 23, 257271.Google Scholar
King, D. J. (1970). The subject pool. American Psychologist, 25, 11791181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0037911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landrum, R. E., & Chastain, G. (1995). Experiment spot-checks: Amethod for assessing the educational value of undergraduate participation in research. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 17, 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3564152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. (1981). Asurvey of introductory psychology subject pool practices among leading universities. Teaching of Psychology, 8, 211213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top0804_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalesnik, S. W., Heaton, J. O., Olsen, C. H., Haffner, W. H. J., & Zahn, C. M. (2004). Incorporating problem based learning into obstetrics/gynecology clerkship: Impact on student satisfaction and grades, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 190, 13751381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(03)02006-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ochsendor, F. R., Boehncke, W. H., Sommerlad, M., & Kaufmann, R. (2006). Interactive large group teaching in a dermatology course. Medical Teacher, 28, 697701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590601034241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Zamboanga, B. L., Thompson, R. A., & Schmersal, L. A. (2005). Extra credit as incentive for voluntary research participation. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 150153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3203_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2006). The impact of daily extra credit quizzes on exam performance. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 236239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3304_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rau, W., & Durand, A. (2000). The academic ethic and college grades: Does hard work help students to “make the grade”? Sociology of Education, 73, 1938. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2673197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosell, M. C., Beck, D. M., Luther, K. E., Goedert, K. M., Shore, W. J., & Anderson, D. A. (2005). Progression of students' knowledge about psychology: The value of experimental participation paired with course content. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 9599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3202_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1975). The volunteer subject. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Touron, J. (1983). The determinants of factors related to academic achievement in the university: Implications for the selection and counseling of students. Higher Education, 12, 399410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00158243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trafimow, D., Madson, L., & Gwizdowski, I. (2006).Introductory psychology students' perceptions of alternatives to research participation. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 247249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3304_7Google Scholar
Williams, J. B., & Jacobs, J. (2004). Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in the higher education. Australasian Journal of Education Technology, 20, 232247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. L., & Hardgrave, B. C. (1995). Predicting graduate student success in an MBA program: Regression versus classification. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 186195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055002003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Research Participation Improves Student's Exam Performance
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Research Participation Improves Student's Exam Performance
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Research Participation Improves Student's Exam Performance
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *