Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-4k54s Total loading time: 0.277 Render date: 2021-12-07T10:21:54.892Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Measuring Public Corruption in the American States: A Survey of State House Reporters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Richard T. Boylan
Affiliation:
University of Alabama
Cheryl X. Long
Affiliation:
Colgate University

Abstract

We use a survey of State House reporters to measure corruption in state government and assess the priority federal prosecutors place on corruption investigations. The reliability and validity of the corruption measures are assessed, as are the relationships among corruption level, federal prosecutorial effort, and the number of federal prosecutions. Federal corruption prosecutions are positively correlated with both corruption and prosecutorial effort. Hence, we argue that federal prosecution data provide a potentially biased and unreliable measure of state public corruption.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ades, Alberto, and Tella, Rafael Di. 1999. “Rents, Competition and Corruption.” American Economic Review 89:982993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, James, and Lassen, David Dreyer. 2002. “The Political Economy of Institutions and Corruption in American States.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Public Choice Society, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Alt, James, Lassen, David Dreyer, and Skilling, David. 2002. “Fiscal Transparency, Gubernatorial Popularity, and the Scale of Government: Evidence from the States.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2:230250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, J. Scott. 1975. “Monetary Incentives in Mail Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 39:111116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunetti, Aymo, Kisunko, Gregory, and Weder, Beatrice. 1997. “Institutional Obstacles to Doing Business: Region-by-Region Results for a Worldwide Survey of the Private Sector.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1759. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2000. National Corrections Reporting Program, 1997. Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. 1951. “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests.” Psychometrika 2:151160.Google Scholar
Dillman, Don A. 1972. “Increasing Mail Questionnaire Responses for Large Samples of the General Public.” Public Opinion Quarterly 35:254257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillman, Don A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Dillman, Don A. 1983. “Mail and Self-Administered Surveys.” In Handbook of Survey Studies, eds. Rossi, Peter H., Wright, James D., and Anderson, Andy B.. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dillman, Don A. 1991. “The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys.” Annual Review of Sociology 17:225249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillman, Don A., Christenson, James A., Carpenter, Edwin H., and Brooks, Ralph M.. 1974. “Increasing Mail Questionnaire Response: A Four-State Comparison.” American Sociological Review 39:744756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillman, Don A., and Frey, James H.. 1974. “Contribution of Personalization to Mail Questionnaire Response as an Element of a Previously Tested Method.” Journal of Applied Psychology 59:297301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisman, Raymond, and Gatti, Roberta. 2002. “Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence across Countries.” Journal of Public Economics 83:325345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard J., Crask, Melvin R., and Kim, Jonghoon. 1988. “Mail Survey Response Rate: A Meta-Analysis of Selected Techniques for Inducing Response.” Public Opinion Quarterly 52:467491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel, Rajeev K., and Nelson, Michael A.. 1998. “Corruption and Government Size: A Disaggregated Analysis.” Public Choice 97:107120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grembowski, David. 1985. “Survey Questionnaire Salience (Letter).” American Journal of Public Health 75:1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heberlein, Thomas A., and Baumgartner, Robert. 1978. “Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A Comprehensive Literature Review.” American Sociological Review 43:447462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Jeanine H., and Bolstein, Richard. 1992. “Large Monetary Incentives and Their Effect on Mail Survey Response Rates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56:442453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Simon, Kaufmann, Daniel, and Zoido-Lobaton, Pablo. 1998. “Regulatory Discretion and the Unofficial Economy.” American Economic Review 88:387392.Google Scholar
Krysan, Maria, Schuman, Howard, Scott, Lesli Jo, and Beatty, Paul. 1994. “Response Rates and Response Content in Mail versus Face-to-Face Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 58:381399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauro, Paolo. 1995. “Corruption and Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110:681712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauro, Paolo. 1998. “Corruption and the Composition of Government Expenditure.” Journal of Public Economics 69:263279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and Holbrook, Thomas. 1992. “I Seen My Opportunities and I Took 'em: Political Corruption in the American States.” Journal of Politics 54:135155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunnally, J. C., and Bernstein, I. H.. 1994. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Omnigraphics, Inc. 1997. Government Phone Book USA. 5th ed. Detroit, MI: Omnigraphics, Inc.Google Scholar
Peters, John G., and Welch, Susan. 1978. “Politics, Corruption and Political Culture: A View from the State Legislature.” American Politics Quarterly 6: 345356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Public Integrity Section. 1991. Report to Congress on the Activities and Operations of the Public Integrity Section for 1990. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Thomas, and Meier, Kenneth J.. 2002. “The Targeting of Political Corruption in the United States.” In Political Corruption, eds. Heidenheimer, Arnold and Johnston, Michael. 3rd ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Scott, Christopher. 1961. “Research on Mail Surveys.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A 124:144205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SRDS Media Solutions. 1998a. SRDS Radio Advertising Source. Des Plaines, IL: SRDS Media Solutions.Google Scholar
SRDS Media Solutions. 1998b. SRDS TV & Cable Source. Des Plaines, IL: SRDS Media Solutions.Google Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 2000. “The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study.” Journal of Public Economics 76:399457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Jessica C. 2000. “State House Reporters: Their Unofficial Role in the Governmental Process.” http://www.lib.niu.edu/ipo/ii7504118.html.Google Scholar
101
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Measuring Public Corruption in the American States: A Survey of State House Reporters
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Measuring Public Corruption in the American States: A Survey of State House Reporters
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Measuring Public Corruption in the American States: A Survey of State House Reporters
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *