Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Studies in American Political Development, Volume 23, Issue 2
  • October 2009, pp. 189-217

Before the Countermajoritarian Difficulty: Regime Unity, Loyal Opposition, and Hostilities toward Judicial Authority in Early America

  • Stephen M. Engel (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X09990046
  • Published online: 01 September 2009
Abstract

Traditional accounts of presidential hostility toward judicial authority rely on the federal judiciary's structure for explanatory leverage, focusing particularly on the court's potential to reach countermajoritarian rulings. By evaluating executive-judicial relations during the early republic, that is, the years prior to the Civil War, I suggest that anti-court sentiment stemmed not only from antipathy toward unelected judges or the seemingly undemocratic possibilities of judicial review, but also from a civic republican apprehension toward opposition. I show, first, that Jefferson, Jackson, and Van Buren considered open and stable opposition to be a harbinger of civil unrest and strove to preserve unity among the federal branches, and second, that this fear and corresponding aspiration toward unity underlay these presidents' concerns about judicial authority. As such, I argue that the presumption of the judiciary's countermajoritarian difficulty could be understood as a political development rather than a structural anomaly of the Constitution. In making this claim, I highlight the power of entrepreneurial presidents to drive conceptual change. Furthermore, focusing on the politics of opposition as a key element in the development of presidential-judicial relations broadens how we think of civic republicanism as an organizing political principle, defining not only early American political culture and electoral politics, but also influencing matters of governance.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

G. Rosenberg , “Judicial Independence and the Reality of Political Power,” Review of Politics 54 (1992)

B. Friedman , “The Birth of an Academic Obsession: The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Five,” Yale Law Journal 112 (2002)

G. Caldeira and J. L. Gibson , “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court,” American Journal of Political Science 36 (1992)

D. Easton , “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support,” British Journal of Political Science 5 (1975): 435–57

G. Caldeira , “Neither the Purse nor the Sword: The Dynamics of Public Confidence in the United States Supreme Court,” American Political Science Review 80 (1986): 1209–26

J. Tanenhaus and W. F. Murphy , “Patterns of Public Support for the Supreme Court: A Panel Study,” Journal of Politics 43 (1981): 24–39

K. Whittington , “Interpose Your Friendly Hand: Political Supports and the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court,” American Political Science Review 99 (2005)

M. A. Graber , “The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary,” Studies in American Political Development 7 (1993)

H. Gillman , “How Political Parties Can Use the Courts to Advance Their Agendas: Federal Courts in the United States, 1875–1891,” American Political Science Review 96 (2002)

B. Weingast , “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law,” American Political Science Review 91 (1997)

C. Geyh , When Congress and the Court Collide (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006)

J. P. Martin , “When Repression is Democratic and Constitutional: The Federalist Theory of Representation and the Sedition Act of 1798,” University of Chicago Law Review 66 (1999): 117182

A. I. P. Smith , No Party Now: Politics in the Civil War North (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006)

R. C. Lieberman , “Ideas, Institutions, and Political Order: Explaining Political Change,” American Political Science Review 96 (2002): 689

D. T. Rodgers , “Republicanism: the Career of a Concept,” Journal of American History 79 (1992): 30

R. Smith , “Beyond Tocqueville, Myrdal, and Hartz: The Multiple Traditions in America,” American Political Science Review 87 (1993): 549–66

R. Formisano , “Deferential-Participant Politics: The Early Republic's Political Culture, 1789–1840,” American Political Science Review 68 (1974): 473487

M. Smelsner , “The Federalist Period as an Age of Passion,” American Quarterly 10 (1958): 391419

P. A Hamburger , “The Constitution's Accommodation of Social Change,” Michigan Law Review 88 (1989): 241

J. N. Rakove , “The Origins of Judicial Review: A Plea for New Contexts,” Stanford Law Review 49 (1997): 1062

R. K. Newmyer , “Thomas Jefferson and the Rise of the Supreme Court,” Journal of Supreme Court History 31 (2006): 126140

M. A. Graber , “Establishing Judicial Review: Schooner Peggy and the Early Marshall Court,” Political Research Quarterly 51 (1998): 221239

C. Wolfe , “John Marshall and Constitutional Law,” Polity 15 (1982)

H. Gillman , “The Collapse of Constitutional Originalism and the Rise of the Notion of the ‘Living Constitution’ in the Course of American State-Building,” Studies in American Political Development 11 (1992), 191203

M. Wallace , “Changing Concepts of Party in the United States: New York, 1815–1828,” American Historical Review 74 (1968): 453–91

R. Longaker , “Andrew Jackson and the Judiciary,” Political Science Quarterly 71 (1956): 341

R. E. Shallhope , “Toward a Republican Synthesis: The Emergence of an Understanding of Republicanism in American Historiography,” William and Mary Quarterly 29 (1972): 4980

J. C. Burke , “The Cherokee Cases: A Study in Law, Politics, and Morality,” Stanford Law Review 21 (1969): 500–31

E. Erler , “The Problem of the Public Good in The Federalist,” Polity 13 (1981): 649–67

M. Wilson , “The ‘Country’ versus the ‘Court’: A Republican Consensus and Party Debate during the Bank War,” Journal of the Early Republic 15 (1995): 619647

R. Clinton , “A Mandatory View of Federal Court Jurisdiction: Early Implementation of and Departures from the Constitutional Plan,” Columbia Law Review 86 (1986)

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in American Political Development
  • ISSN: 0898-588X
  • EISSN: 1469-8692
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-american-political-development
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×