Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Ernst Freund, Felix Frankfurter, and the American Rechtsstaat: A Transatlantic Shipwreck, 1894–1932

  • Daniel R. Ernst (a1)

From the passage of the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887 through the New Deal, American legislators commonly endowed administrative agencies with broad discretionary power. They did so over the objections of an intellectual founder of the American administrative state. The American-born, German-educated lawyer and political scientist Ernst Freund developed an Americanized version of the Rechtsstaat—a government bound by fixed and definite rules—in an impressive body of scholarship between 1894 and 1915. In 1920 he eagerly took up an offer from the Commonwealth Fund to finance a comprehensive study of administration in the United States. Here was his chance to show that a Continental version of the Rule of Law had come to America. Unfortunately for Freund, the Commonwealth Fund yoked him to the Austrian-born, American-educated Felix Frankfurter, a celebrant of the enlightened discretion of administrators. Freund's major publication for the Commonwealth Fund, Administrative Powers over Persons and Property (1928), made little impression on scholars of administrative law, who took their lead from Frankfurter. Today the Rechtsstaat is largely the beau ideal of libertarian critics of the New Deal; few recognize that it is also part of the diverse legacy of Progressive reform.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Louis L. Jaffe , “The Illusion of the Ideal Administration,Harvard Law Review 86 (1973): 1186, 1185

Theodore Rosenof , “Freedom, Planning, and Totalitarianism: The Reception of F. A. Hayek's Road to Serfdom,Canadian Review of American Studies 5 (1974): 149–65

N. E. H. Hull , “Restatement and Reform: A New Perspective on the Origins of the American Law Institute,Law and History Review 8 (1990): 75

Thomas Reed Powell , “Administrative Exercise of the Police Power,Harvard Law Review 24 (1911): 268–89, 333–46, 441–59

Jerry L. Mashaw , “Recovering American Administrative Law: Federalist Foundations, 1787–1801,Yale Law Journal 115 (2006): 12562006

Jerry L. Mashaw , “Reluctant Nationalists: Federal Administration and Administrative Law in the Republican Era, 1801–1829,Yale Law Journal, 116 (2007): 100205

Jerry L. Mashaw , “Administration and ‘The Democracy’: Administrative Law from Jackson to Lincoln, 1829–1861,Yale Law Journal 117 (2008): 15681693

Daniel T. Rodgers , “In Search of Progressivism,Reviews in American History 10 (1982): 124–25

Eric Hahn , “Rudolf Gneist and the Prussian Rechtsstaat, 1862–78,Journal of Modern History 49 (1977): D1363–64, D1366

Kenneth F. Ledford , “Formalizing the Rule of Law in Prussia: The Supreme Administrative Law Court, 1876–1914,Central European History 37 (2004): 203–24

Ernst Freund , “The Law of the Administration in America,Political Science Quarterly 9 (1894): 405

Ernst Freund , “The Substitution of Rule for Discretion in Public Law,American Political Science Review 9 (1915): 670

Ernst Freund , “Discussion,Proceedings of the American Political Science Association 6 (1909): 60

Ernst Freund , “The Problem of Intelligent Legislation,Proceedings of the American Political Science Association 4 (1907): 7071, 79

Maurice T. Van Hecke , “Ernst Freund as a Teacher of Legislation,University of Chicago Law Review 1 (1933): 9294

Arthur H. Kent , “The Work of Ernst Freund in the Field of Legislation,University of Chicago Law Review 1 (1933): 9496

G. Cullom Davis , “The Transformation of the Federal Trade Commission, 1914–1929,Mississippi Valley Historical Review 49 (1962): 437–55

George Rublee , review of Henderson, The Federal Trade Commission, Harvard Law Review 38 (1924): 269

Charles S. Hyneman , “Administrative Adjudication: An Analysis II,Political Science Quarterly 51 (1936): 519

Ralph F. Fuchs , “Concepts and Policies in Anglo-American Administrative Law Theory,Yale Law Journal 47 (1938): 546–47, n. 32

E. Blythe Stason , review of Freund, Administrative Powers, Michigan Law Review 27 (1929): 845–46

Richard B. Stewart , “The Reformation of American Administrative Law,Harvard Law Review 88 (1975): 1694

Brian Balogh , “Reorganizing the Organizational Synthesis: Federal-Professional Relations in Modern America,Studies in American Political Development 5 (1991): 147–70

Donald R. Brand , “The President as Chief Administrator: James Landis and the Brownlow Report,Political Science Quarterly 123 (2008): 6993

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in American Political Development
  • ISSN: 0898-588X
  • EISSN: 1469-8692
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-american-political-development
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 14 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 103 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.