Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Is the EQ–5D fit for purpose in mental health?

  • John Brazier (a1)
Abstract
Summary

The EQ–5D is a widely used questionnaire for calculating quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for assessing cost-effectiveness in healthcare. It reflects the impact of common mental health conditions such as mild to moderate depression but seems to be more problematic for use in people with psychotic and severe and complex nonpsychotic disorders.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Is the EQ–5D fit for purpose in mental health?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Is the EQ–5D fit for purpose in mental health?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Is the EQ–5D fit for purpose in mental health?
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
1 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. NICE, 2008 (http://www.nice.org.uk/media/B52/A7/TAMethodsGuideUpdatedJune2008.pdf).
2 Saarni, SI, Viertiö, S, Perälä, J, Koskinen, S, Lönnqvist, J, Suvisaari, J. Quality of life of people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and other psychotic disorders. Br J Psychiatry 2010; 197: 386–94.
3 Brazier, JE, Ratcliffe, J, Tsuchiya, A, Solomon, J. Measuring and Valuing Health for Economic Evaluation. Oxford University Press, 2007.
4 Brooks, RG. Euroqol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 37: 5372.
5 Lamers, LM, Bouwmans, CA, van Straten, A, Donker, MC, Hakkaart, L. Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities in mental health. Health Econ 2006; 15: 1229–36.
6 van de Willige, G, Wiersma, D, Nienhuis, FJ, Jenner, JA. Changes in quality of life in chronic psychiatric patients: a comparison between EQ-5D and WHOQoL. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 441–51.
7 Brazier, J. Measuring and valuing mental health for economic evaluation. J Health Serv Res Policy 2008; 13 (suppl 3): 70–5.
9 Barton, GR, Hodgekins, J, Mugford, M, Jones, PB, Croudace, T, Fowler, D. Measuring the benefits of treatment for psychosis: validity and responsiveness of the EQ–5D. Br J Psychiatry 2009; 195: 170–7.
10 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 79.
11 Gilbody, S, House, A, Sheldon, T. Routine administration of health related quality of life and needs assessment instruments to improve psychological outcome. Psychol Med 2002; 32: 1345–56.
12 Mavranezouli, I, Brazier, JE, Young, TA, Barkham, M. Using Rasch analysis to form plausible health states amenable to valuation: the development of CORE-6D from CORE-OM in order to elicit preferences for common mental health problems. Health Economics and Decision Science Discussion Paper 09/09. University of Sheffield, 2009 (http://www.shef.ac.uk/content/1/c6/01/87/47/HEDS%20DP%200909.pdf).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • ISSN: 0007-1250
  • EISSN: 1472-1465
  • URL: /core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Is the EQ–5D fit for purpose in mental health?

  • John Brazier (a1)
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *