Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-dc8c957cd-qr7d4 Total loading time: 0.891 Render date: 2022-01-28T05:35:25.430Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

The Modena Consultation–Liaison Psychiatry Service, Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

M. Rigatelli*
Affiliation:
Modena Consultation–Liaison Psychiatry Service, Psychiatry Department, Modena University Hospital, Modena, Italy
S. Ferrari
Affiliation:
Modena Consultation–Liaison Psychiatry Service, Psychiatry Department, Modena University Hospital, Modena, Italy
*
Correspondence: Marco Rigatelli, MD, Professor of Psychiatry, Clinica Psichiatrica – Policlinico di Modena, Via del Pozzo, 71, 41100 Modena, Italy. Tel: +39 059 4222436; Fax: +39 059 4224307; e-mail: riga@unimo.it
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Reform Law 180, approved in Italy in 1978, had – and still has – great national and international significance for its dramatic consequences on both clinical and health organisational aspects of psychiatry: the law, in short, had the great effect of bringing psychiatry back to medicine, to the community and to the general hospital. This was the starting point of other relevant events, one of which was the establishment of the specialty of consultation-liaison psychiatry in Italy (Cazzullo et al, 1984). Since then, consultation-liaison psychiatry has gradually developed worldwide and in Italy as a super-specialised branch of psychiatry, able to put into practice – to operationalise – the great psychosomatic tradition in its three interrelated strands of clinical, teaching and research activities. The report that follows is strongly influenced by this historical background.

Type
Psychiatry Around the World
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2004 

The Reform Law 180, approved in Italy in 1978, had - and still has - great national and international significance for its dramatic consequences on both clinical and health organisational aspects of psychiatry: the law, in short, had the great effect of bringing psychiatry back to medicine, to the community and to the general hospital. This was the starting point of other relevant events, one of which was the establishment of the specialty of consultation–liaison psychiatry in Italy (Reference Cazzullo, Comazzi and GuaraldiCazzullo et al, 1984). Since then, consultation–liaison psychiatry has gradually developed worldwide and in Italy as a super-specialised branch of psychiatry, able to put into practice - to operationalise - the great psychosomatic tradition in its three interrelated strands of clinical, teaching and research activities. The report that follows is strongly influenced by this historical background.

CLINICAL WORK PERFORMED

Founded in 1989, the Consultation–Liaison Psychiatry service of Modena University Hospital is one of the services of that hospital's psychiatric department, which also includes a psychiatric ward (for both voluntary and compulsorily admitted patients), a day hospital, an out-patient clinic and a rehabilitation unit. With its consultation–liaison activities and out-patient clinic, the Modena service now provides about 1200 first consultations a year, corresponding to around 3% of all patients admitted to non-psychiatric hospital departments in the same period - twice the European average of 1.4% (Reference Huyse, Herzog and LoboHuyse et al, 2001a ; Table 1). The workforce comprises one full-time and one half-time consultation–liaison psychiatry consultants, four or five psychiatry residents, two consultant psychiatrists who are also PhD students and a clinical psychologist.

Table 1 Modena University Hospital Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Service: activity data

Year Days of activity Beds n First consultations n Consultations/admissions (%) Out-patient consultations n (%) Concordance of time of request/consultation
1989 232 - 507 1.48 77 -
1990 215 - 467 1.35 86 -
1991 245 - 589 1.6 28 -
1992 243 - 695 1.88 9 -
1993 233 993 756 2.06 47 -
1994 252 1018 878 2.23 74 -
1995 250 1025 771 2.14 123 -
1996 262 911 814 2.25 127 100
1997 247 891 847 2.29 115 100
1998 255 891 949 2.8 98 100
1999 255 892 868 2.34 410 100
2000 251 921 935 2.11 845 100
2001 253 928 1247 2.52 677 100
2002 250 890 1136 3.66 719 100
20031 855

PREVIOUS RESEARCH

In the work previously addressed by the team, three main streams of research are recognisable. The first is that originating from the intense involvement of the team in the three EU-funded multicentre projects and promoted by the European Consultation–Liaison Workgroup (ECLW) since the beginning of the 1990s (Reference Herzog, Huyse, Cardoso and BaertHerzog et al, 1995; Huyse et al, Reference Huyse, Herzog and Malt1996, Reference Huyse, Herzog and Lobo2000a ,Reference Huyse, Herzog and Lobo b , Reference Huyse, Herzog and Lobo2001a ; Reference Lobo, Huyse and HerzogLobo et al, 1996; Reference Malt, Huyse and HerzogMalt et al, 1996). Further national projects sprang from that experience (Reference Gala, Rigatelli and de BertoliniGala et al, 1999; Reference Grassi, Gritti and RigatelliGrassi et al, 2000). This involvement had numerous direct and indirect outcomes, particularly the increasing improvement in clinical and organisational standards: for example, the regular use of structured forms for psychiatric referral and back-referral, and of computerised databases, and better definitions of procedures of intervention, specifically for common or critical clinical situations, such as delirium and self-harm. The obvious next step was the involvement in quality assurance work: from 1994 to 1997, the team took part in a multi-centre quality assurance study (Reference Herzog, Huyse, Cardoso and BaertHerzog et al, 1995); meanwhile, work began on the accreditation–certification scheme, culminating in International Organization for Standardization ISO 9000 certification of the whole University of Modena psychiatry department in 2002.

A further emanation of the initial ECLW projects is the development of INTERMED, a screening instrument designed to predict complexity of care, acknowledged as the operationalisation of the Engel biopsychosocial paradigm (Reference De Jonge, Huyse and Slaetsde Jonge et al, 2001; Reference Huyse, Lyons and StiefelHuyse et al, 2001b ).

A second research stream is that dealing with organisational issues in consultation–liaison psychiatry. Two examples are an analysis of what happens to patients referred to a consultation–liaison service following their discharge from hospital (Reference Rigatelli, Casolari and MassariRigatelli et al, 2001), and a description of the teaching programme promoted by the consultation–liaison psychiatry service in Modena University Hospital (Reference Rigatelli, Ferrari and UguzzoniRigatelli et al, 2000).

The third is less epidemiological and more speculative in nature, involving collaboration with specialists from other medical disciplines. These projects address the ‘boundaries of medicine’ - syndromes of difficult biological definition such as vertigo (Reference Monzani, Casolari and GuidettiMonzani et al, 2001), obstetric and gynaecological or andrological disorders (Reference Pescatori, Silingardi and GaleazziPescatori et al, 2000; Reference Rigatelli, Galeazzi and PalmieriRigatelli et al, 2002) and, previously, ulcerative colitis (Reference RigatelliRigatelli, 1981).

NEW INITIATIVES

Work is in progress in all of the three areas described above. As a contribution to the operationalisation of psychosomatic constructs, a recent study on interrater reliability of the Diagnostic Criteria for use in Psychosomatic Research, first conceived by Fava et al (Reference Fava, Freyberger and Bech1995), is shortly to be published in Psychosomatics (Reference Galeazzi, Ferrari and MackinnonGaleazzi et al, 2004).

The Modena Consultation–Liaison Psychiatry service is one of thirty centres involved in the second national multicentre inquiry into consultation–liaison psychiatry activity in Italy, recently conducted by the Società Italiana di Psichiatria di Consultazione (Italian Society of Consultation Psychiatry; www.sipc.it), which collected data on more than 10 000 patients referred to a consultation–liaison psychiatry service. In another analysis of service management and organisation, the team has conducted a study on levels of satisfaction among the Modena University Hospital ward physicians, surgeons and head nurses about the quality of consultation–liaison activities.

Increasing interest is being focused on consultation–liaison psychiatry in the setting of primary care or general medicine outside the hospital. This is still a pioneer field in Italy. A study is in progress to characterise features of frequent attenders at primary care clinics, and possibly to identify higher rates of psychic distress in these patients compared with normal attenders.

The recent opening of an active transplant unit at Modena University Hospital and the consequent increase in psychiatric referrals, both arising from pre-transplant assessment procedures and after surgery, were the stimulus to initiating research in this area, including psychopathological evaluation, evaluation of psychosocial and familial variables, and investigation of adaptive and compliance abilities.

References

Cazzullo, C. L., Comazzi, M., Guaraldi, G. P., et al (1984) General hospital psychiatry in Italy: on the hospitalization of psychiatric patients and consultation–liaison psychiatry after law 180/1978. General Hospital Psychiatry, 6, 261265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Jonge, P., Huyse, F. J., Slaets, J. P. J., et al (2001) Care complexity in the general hospital. Results from a European study. Psychosomatics, 42, 204212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fava, G. A., Freyberger, H. J., Bech, P., et al (1995) Diagnostic criteria for use in psychosomatic research. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 63, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gala, C., Rigatelli, M., de Bertolini, C., et al (1999) A multicenter investigation of consultation–liaison psychiatry in Italy. General Hospital Psychiatry, 21, 310317 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galeazzi, G. M., Ferrari, S., Mackinnon, A., et al (2004) Inter-rater reliability, prevalence and relation to ICD–10 diagnoses of Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research in Consultation Liaison Psychiatry patients. Psychosomatics, inpress.Google Scholar
Grassi, L., Gritti, P., Rigatelli, M., et al (2000) Psychosocial problems secondary to cancer: an Italian multicentre survey of consultation–liaison psychiatry in oncology. European Journal of Cancer, 36, 579585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, T., Huyse, F. J., Cardoso, G., et al (1995) Quality Assurance (QA) in consultation liaison psychiatry and psychosomatics. Development and implementation of an European QA System. In European Union Biomedical and Health Research. The BIOMED 1 Programme (ed. Baert, A. E.), vol. 9, pp. 525526. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Huyse, F. J., Herzog, T., Malt, U. F., et al (1996) The ECLW collaborative study: I. General outline. General Hospital Psychiatry, 18, 4455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huyse, F. J., Herzog, T., Lobo, A., et al (2000a) European consultation–liaison services and their user populations. The European Consultation–Liaison Workgroup collaborative study. Psychosomatics, 41, 330338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huyse, F. J., Herzog, T., Lobo, A., et al (2000b) European Consultation–Liaison Psychiatric Services: the ECLW collaborative study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 101, 360366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huyse, F. J., Herzog, T., Lobo, A., et al (2001a) Consultation–liaison psychiatric service delivery: results from a European study. General Hospital Psychiatry, 23, 124132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huyse, F. J., Lyons, J. S., Stiefel, F., et al (2001b) Operationalizing the biopsychosocial model: the intermed. Psychosomatics, 45, 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobo, A., Huyse, F. J., Herzog, T., et al (1996) The ECLW collaborative study: II. Patient registration form (PRF) instrument, training and reliability. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 2, 143156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malt, U. F., Huyse, F. J., Herzog, T., et al (1996) The ECLW collaborative study: III. Training and reliability of ICD–10 diagnoses in the general hospital setting – an investigation of 220 consultants from 14 European countries. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 5, 451463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monzani, D., Casolari, L., Guidetti, G., et al (2001) Psychological distress and disability in patients with vertigo. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 50, 319323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pescatori, E. S., Silingardi, V., Galeazzi, G. M., et al (2000) Audiovisual sexual stimulation by virtual glasses is effective in inducing complete cavernosal smooth muscle relaxation: a pharmacocavernosometric study. International Journal of Impotence Research, 12, 8388.Google ScholarPubMed
Rigatelli, M. (1981) A global psychosomatic study of 16 consecutive patients with ulcerative colitis. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 35, 2233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigatelli, M., Ferrari, S., Uguzzoni, U., et al (2000) Teaching and training in the psychiatric–psychosomatic consultation–liaison setting. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 69, 219226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigatelli, M., Casolari, L., Massari, I., et al (2001) A follow-up study of psychiatric consultations in the general hospital: what happens to patients after discharge. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 70, 276282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigatelli, M., Galeazzi, G. M. & Palmieri, G. (2002) Consultation–liaison psychiatry in obstetrics and gynaecology. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 23, 165172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Modena University Hospital Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Service: activity data

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.
You have Access
9
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Modena Consultation–Liaison Psychiatry Service, Italy
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The Modena Consultation–Liaison Psychiatry Service, Italy
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The Modena Consultation–Liaison Psychiatry Service, Italy
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *