Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The past and future of delusions research: from the inexplicable to the treatable

  • P. A. Garety (a1) and D. Freeman (a2)
Abstract
Background

Problems with the diagnosis and treatment of schizophrenia have led for a call to change strategy and focus on individual psychotic experiences. In recent years, research on delusions has led the way.

Aims

To update our 1999 review of almost 40 studies on delusions.

Method

A systematic literature search was conducted of reasoning and affective processes related to delusions.

Results

Over 200 studies were identified. The presence of jumping to conclusions' in individuals with delusions has been substantiated, the theory of mind account has not stood up to subsequent testing, and there is a promising new focus on the ways that affective processes contribute to delusional experience.

Conclusions

Theoretical work rendering delusions understandable can be translated into treatment; future clinical trials should focus on individual psychotic experiences as outcomes.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The past and future of delusions research: from the inexplicable to the treatable
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The past and future of delusions research: from the inexplicable to the treatable
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The past and future of delusions research: from the inexplicable to the treatable
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Professor P. A. Garety, Box PO77, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. Email: philippa.garety@kcl.ac.uk
Footnotes
Hide All

Declaration of interest

None.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
1 Jones, P., Barnes, T., Davies, L., Dunn, G., Lloyd, H., Hayhurst, K., et al Randomized controlled trial of the effect on Quality of Life of second- vs first-generation antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006; 63: 1079–87.
2 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Schizophrenia: Core Interventions in the Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Primary and Secondary Care (Update). NICE, 2009.
3 Lewis, G., Barnes, T., Davies, L., Murray, R., Dunn, G., Hayhurst, K., et al Randomized controlled trial of effect of prescription of clozapine versus other second-generation antipsychotic drugs in resistant schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2006; 32: 715–23.
4 McCrone, P., Craig, TKJ, Power, P., Garety, PA. Cost-effectiveness of an early intervention service for people with psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 2010; 196: 377–82.
5 Craddock, N., Owen, MJ. The Kraepelinian dichotomy - going, going … but still not gone. Br J Psychiatry 2010; 196: 92–5.
6 Kelleher, I., Keeley, H., Corcoran, P., Lynch, F., Fitzpatrick, C., Devlin, N., et al Clinicopathological significance of psychotic experiences in non-psychotic young people: evidence from four population-based studies. Br J Psychiatry 2012; 201: 2632.
7 Peralta, V., Cuesta, MJ. Dimensional structure of psychotic symptoms: an item- level analysis of SAPS and SANS symptoms in psychotic disorders. Schizophr Res 1999; 38: 1326.
8 Wigman, JTW, Vollebergh, WAM, Raaijmakers, QAW, Ledema, J., van Dorsselaer, S., Ormel, J., et al The structure of the extended psychosis phenotype in early adolescence - a cross-sample replication. Schizophr Bull 2011; 37: 850–60.
9 van Os, J. A salience dysregulation syndrome. Br J Psychiatry 2009; 194: 101–3.
10 Owen, MJ, O'Donovan, MC, Thapar, A., Craddock, N. Neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 2011; 198: 173–5.
11 Garety, PA, Freeman, D. Cognitive approaches to delusions: a critical review of theories and evidence. Br J Clin Psychol 1999; 38: 113–54.
12 Garety, PA, Kuipers, E., Fowler, D., Freeman, D., Bebbington, PE. A cognitive model of the positive symptoms of psychosis. Psychol Med 2001; 31: 189–95.
13 Garety, PA, Freeman, D., Jolley, S., Dunn, G., Bebbington, PE, Fowler, D., et al Reasoning, emotions and delusional conviction in psychosis. J Abnorm Psychol 2005; 114: 373–84.
14 Fine, C., Gardner, M., Craigie, J., Gold, I. Hopping, skipping or jumping to conclusions? Clarifying the role of the JTC bias in delusions. Cog Neuropsychiatry 2007; 12: 4677.
15 Lincoln, TM, Ziegler, M., Mehl, S., Rief, W. The jumping to conclusions bias in delusions: specificity and changeability. J Abnorm Psychol 2010; 119: 40–9.
16 Lunt, L., Bramham, J., Morris, RG, Bullock, PR, Selway, RP, Xenitidis, K., et al Prefrontal cortex dysfunction and Jumping to Conclusions': bias or deficit? J Neuropsychol 2012; 6: 6578.
17 Freeman, D., Pugh, K., Garety, P. Jumping to conclusions and paranoid ideation in the general population. Schizophr Res 2008; 102: 254–60.
18 Broome, MR, Johns, LC, Valli, I., Woolley, JB, Tabraham, P., Brett, C., et al Delusion formation and reasoning biases in those at clinical high risk for psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 191 (suppl 51): s3842.
19 Lincoln, TM, Lange, J., Burau, J., Exner, C., Moritz, S. The effect of state anxiety on paranoid ideation and jumping to conclusions. An experimental investigation. Schizophr Bull 2010; 36: 1140–8.
20 So, SH, Freeman, D., Dunn, G., Kapur, S., Kuipers, E., Bebbington, P., et al Jumping to conclusions, a lack of belief flexibility and delusional conviction in psychosis: a longitudinal investigation of the structure, frequency, and relatedness of reasoning biases. J Abnorm Psychol 2012; 121: 129–39.
21 Ross, K., Freeman, D., Dunn, G., Garety, P. A randomized experimental investigation of reasoning training for people with delusions. Schizophr Bull 2011; 37: 324–33.
22 Waller, H., Freeman, D., Jolley, S., Dunn, G., Garety, P. Targeting reasoning biases in delusions: a pilot study of the Maudsley Review Training Programme for individuals with persistent, high conviction delusions. Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2011; 42: 414–21.
23 Garety, P., Gittins, M., Jolley, S., Bebbington, P., Dunn, G., Kuipers, E., et al Differences in cognitive and emotional processes between persecutory and grandiose delusions. Schizophr Bull 2012; 39: 629–39.
24 Brune, M. ‘Theory of Mind’ in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2005; 31: 2142.
25 Frith, CD. The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia. Erlbaum, 1992.
26 Ventura, J., Wood, RC, Hellemann, GS. Symptom domains and neurocognitive functioning can help differentiate social cognitive processes in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull 2011; 39: 102–11.
27 Birchwood, M. Pathways to emotional dysfunction in first-episode psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 2003; 182: 373–5.
28 Freeman, D., Garety, PA. Connecting neurosis and psychosis: the direct influence of emotion on delusions and hallucinations. Behav Res Ther 2003; 41: 923–47.
29 Bentall, RP, Kinderman, P., Kaney, S. The self, attributional processes and abnormal beliefs: towards a model of persecutory delusions. Behav Res Ther 1994; 32: 331–41.
30 Freeman, D., Garety, PA, Kuipers, E., Fowler, D., Bebbington, PE. A cognitive model of persecutory delusions. Br J Clin Psychol 2002; 41: 331–47.
31 Thewissen, V., Bentall, R., Lecomte, T., van Os, J., Myin-Germeys, I. Fluctuations in self-esteem in paranoia in the context of daily life. J Abnorm Psychol 2008; 117: 143–53.
32 Freeman, D., Stahl, D., McManus, S., Meltzer, H., Brugha, T., Wiles, N., et al Insomnia, worry, anxiety and depression as predictors of the occurrence and the persistence of persecutory ideation. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2012; 47: 1195–203.
33 Bentall, RP, Rowse, G., Shryane, N., Kinderman, P., Howard, R., Blackwood, N., et al The cognitive and affective structure of paranoid delusions: a transdiagnostic investigation of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009; 66: 236–47.
34 Bentall, RP, Corcoran, R., Howard, R., Blackwood, N., Kinderman, P. Persecutory delusions: a review and theoretical interpretation. Clin Psychol Rev 2001; 21: 1143–92.
35 Vazquez, C., Diez-Alegria, C., Hernandez-Lloreda, MJ, Moreno, MN. Implicit and explicit self-schema in active deluded, remitted deluded, and depressed patients. Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2008; 39: 587–99.
36 Peterson, C., Semmel, A., Von Baeyer, C., Abramson, L., Metalsky, GI, Seligman, MEP. The Attributional Style Questionnaire. Cognitive Ther Res 1982; 3: 287300.
37 Ben-Zeev, D., Morris, S., Swendson, J., Granholm, E. Predicting the occurrence, conviction, distress and disruption of different delusional experiences in the daily life of people with schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2012; 38: 826–37.
38 Jones, P., Rodgers, B., Murray, R., Marmot, M. Child developmental risk factors for adult schizophrenia in the British 1946 birth cohort. Lancet 1994; 344: 1398–402.
39 Varghese, D., Scott, J., Welham, J., Bor, W., Najman, J., O'Callaghan, M., et al Psychotic-like experiences in major depression and anxiety disorders. Schizophr Bull 2011; 37: 389–93.
40 Startup, H., Freeman, D., Garety, PA. Persecutory delusions and catastrophic worry in psychosis: developing the understanding of delusion distress and persistence. Behav Res Ther 2007; 45: 523–37.
41 Freeman, D., Gittins, M., Pugh, K., Antley, A., Slater, M., Dunn, G. What makes one person paranoid and another person anxious? The differential prediction of social anxiety and persecutory ideation in an experimental situation. Psychol Med 2008; 38: 1121–32.
42 Fowler, D., Hodgekins, J., Garety, P., Freeman, D., Kuipers, E., Dunn, G., et al Negative cognition, depressed mood, and paranoia: a longitudinal pathway analysis using structural equation modeling. Schizophr Bull 2012; 38: 1063–73.
43 Maher, BA. Delusional thinking and perceptual disorder. J Individ Psychol 1974; 30: 98113.
44 Howes, O., Kapur, S. The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2009; 35: 549–62.
45 Van Os, J., Kenis, G., Rutten, BPF. The environment and schizophrenia. Nature 2010; 468: 203–12.
46 Freeman, D. Improving cognitive treatments for delusions. Schizophr Res 2011; 132: 135–9.
47 Kendler, KS, Campbell, J. Interventionist causal models in psychiatry. Psychol Med 2009; 39: 881–7.
48 Foster, C., Startup, H., Potts, L., Freeman, D. A randomised controlled trial of a worry intervention for individuals with persistent persecutory delusions. Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2010; 41: 4551.
49 Trower, P., Birchwood, M., Meaden, A., Byrne, S., Nelson, A., Ross, K. Cognitive therapy for command hallucinations: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2004; 184: 312–20.
50 Garety, PA, Fowler, DG, Freeman, D., Bebbington, P., Dunn, G., Kuipers, E. Cognitive-behavioural therapy and family intervention for relapse prevention and symptom reduction in psychosis: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2008; 192: 412–23.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • ISSN: 0007-1250
  • EISSN: 1472-1465
  • URL: /core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

The past and future of delusions research: from the inexplicable to the treatable

  • P. A. Garety (a1) and D. Freeman (a2)
Submit a response

eLetters

A transdiagnostic approach to delusion

Michele Poletti, Psychotherapist
15 December 2013

Garety and Freeman present an exhaustive updated review on delusions as a single symptom,1 suggesting some general conclusions: 1) the presenceof biased "jumping to conclusions" data-gathering reasoning processes represents a relative stable cognitive trait increasing susceptibility to delusion development; 2) emotion processes may influence the subjective experience associated with delusional states; 3) alterations of Theory of Mind do not mainly contribute to delusion development; 4) studies have been almost exclusively conducted on non-affective psychosis. Some of these issues were discussed in a recent paper2 in which we adopteda transdiagnostic approach to identify a core of neural and neuropsychological alterations at the basis of delusion development acrossdistinct clinical populations. With this aim we reviewed empirical studiesthat investigated neural and neuropsychological alterations in psychiatric(schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression) and neurological (neurodegenerative disorders) populations presenting delusions, and focusing on studies that directly investigated correlates of delusions, when available. Identified core neuroanatomical alteration involves ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex, basal ganglia, amygdala, insula and the Default Mode Network, whereas the core neuropsychological alteration involves reward processing, emotion processing, default mode, memory, social cognition and Self-related processes. The alteration of these processes could contribute to delusions by affecting the generation of affective value, the construction of internal models of the world or the reflection about the Self and other's mental states: delusions may be the result of abnormal Self-centered or Others'-centered internal models of subjective experiences of aberrant affective meaning. Coltheart's two factors-account for monothematic delusions3 suggests that a model of delusions should explain what brought the delusional idea to mind in the first place and why this idea is accepted as true and becomes a belief even if it is clearly bizarre and when plenty of evidence against it is available to the subject. In our model the trigger of delusional ideas is represented by unusual or bizarre experiences of aberrant affective value that the subject tries to explain, and the delusional idea is adopted as belief following altered processes of constructing internal models of the world and mentalizing about Self-Others.The proposed model had the strength to be based on a transdiagnostic analysis of possible neural and cognitive correlates of delusions, and therefore was not based only on delusion in non-affective psychosis, that is one of the limits of empirical research on delusion raised by Garety and Freeman: therefore I agree with them suggesting that more clues on theprocess of delusion development may come from the analysis of delusion as a single symptom comparing different clinical populations. Moreover, in the proposed model an altered process of reflection about the Self and other's mental states is needed for the development of delusion, while Garety and Freeman concluded that Theory of Mind deficits were not specific to delusions; however, some studies directly reported this association4,5 and therefore, on the basis of available data,1 it's not possible to discharge the hypothesis that, even if not specific to delusions, Theory of Mind alterations may play a role in their development.

References1.Garety PA, Freeman D. The past and the future of delusions research: from the inexplicable to the treatable. The British Journal of Psychiatry 2013; 203: 327-333.

2.Poletti M, Sambataro F. The development of delusion revisited: a transdiagnostic framework. Psychiatry Research 2013; 210: 1245-1259.

3. Coltheart M, Langdon R, McKay R. Delusional belief. Annual Review of Psychology 2011; 62:271-298.

4. Bentall RP, Rowse G, Shryane N, et al. The cognitive and affectivestructure of paranoid delusions: a transdiagnostic investigation of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and depression. Archives ofGeneral Psychiatry 2009; 66: 236-247.

5. Montag C, Dziobek I, Richter IS, et al. Different aspects of theory of mind in paranoid schizophrenia: evidence from a video-based assessment. Psychiatry Research 2011; 186: 203-209.

... More

Conflict of interest: None declared

Write a reply

Psychosis as a failure of reality testing

Andrew Shepherd, Doctor
02 December 2013

Garety and Freeman present a timely review on the nature of delusional experience.1 Their conclusion regarding the need to focus on individual features of psychosis seems apt. The presented overview of cognitive and affective mechanisms influencing delusion development seems,however, to overlook an essential component of delusional experience; thatpsychotic symptoms, including delusions, at their heart represent a failure of reality testing.

The description of jumping to conclusions, together with the probabilistic reasoning task methodology, appears to rely on a logical chain of thought progression and conclusion. What Campbell has referred toas an empiricist understanding.2 This approach however does not take into account the nature of conclusions reached in delusional belief: - Conclusions reached on seeing two, or less, coloured counters seem quite distinct from classical examples of delusional perception; "I saw the traffic lights turn green and realised that the world would end". Campbell's alternative rationalist approach presents the delusional subject as having experienced a complete rearrangement of their framework propositions, or underlying background world beliefs. Such a fundamental shift in world view model can go some way to explaining the fantastical nature of conclusions reached, or the failure of reality testing present in psychosis.

Campbell's arguments have not gone unchallenged.3 However what they do highlight is a need for careful consideration as to the manner in whichdelusional beliefs are formed. Garety and Freeman describe the psychoanalytic thinking in relation to defence mechanisms in the development of persecutory delusional belief. Psychotic defence concepts, wherein the subject denies or distorts reality to defend against trauma, provide one possible lens through which psychotic experiences can be viewed.4,5

Garety and Freeman's conclusion relating to the infancy of research into the nature of delusion, and its having been overshadowed by focus on the larger concept of Schizophrenia, highlights the need for further research. Future research will need to provide some account for the distortion of reality that seems central to the experience of psychosis.

1 Garety PA, Freeman D. The past and future of delusions research: from the inexplicable to the treatable. The British Journal of Psychiatry 2013.

2 Campbell J. Rationality, Meaning, and the Analysis of Delusion. Philosophy, Psychiatry, Psychology 2001; 8: 89-100.

3 Bayne T, Pacherie E. Bottom-Up or Top-Down: Campbell's Rationalist Account of Monothematic Delusions. Philosophy, Psychiatry, Psychology 2004; 11: 1-11.

4 Hingley SM. Psychodynamic perspectives on psychosis and psychotherapy. I: Theory. Br J Med Psychol 1997; 70(4): 301-12.

5 Martindale B, Summers A. The psychodynamics of psychosis. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 2013; 19: 124-31.

... More

Conflict of interest: None declared

Write a reply

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *