Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to service user-led care planning

  • Penny Bee (a1), Owen Price (a1), John Baker (a1) and Karina Lovell (a1)
Abstract
Background

Service user (patient) involvement in care planning is a principle enshrined by mental health policy yet often attracts criticism from patients and carers in practice.

Aims

To examine how user-involved care planning is operationalised within mental health services and to establish where, how and why challenges to service user involvement occur.

Method

Systematic evidence synthesis.

Results

Synthesis of data from 117 studies suggests that service user involvement fails because the patients' frame of reference diverges from that of providers. Service users and carers attributed highest value to the relational aspects of care planning. Health professionals inconsistently acknowledged the quality of the care planning process, tending instead to define service user involvement in terms of quantifiable service-led outcomes.

Conclusions

Service user-involved care planning is typically operationalised as a series of practice-based activities compliant with auditor standards. Meaningful involvement demands new patient-centred definitions of care planning quality. New organisational initiatives should validate time spent with service users and display more tangible and flexible commitments to meeting their needs.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to service user-led care planning
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to service user-led care planning
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to service user-led care planning
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence.
Corresponding author
Penny Bee, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester; Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. Email: penny.bee@manchester.ac.uk
Footnotes
Hide All

This work was funded by the UK NIHR Programme Development Grant Scheme.

Declaration of interest

None.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
1 Department of Health. No Health without Mental Health: A Cross-Government Mental Health Outcomes Strategy for People of all Ages. Department of Health, 2011.
2 Healthcare Commission. The Pathway to Recovery: A Review of NHS Acute Inpatient Mental Health Services. Healthcare Commission, 2008.
3 Department of Health. Refocusing the Care Programme Approach. Policy and Positive Practice Guidance. Department of Health, 2008.
4 Crawford, MJ, Rutter, D, Manley, C, Weaver, T, Bhui, K, Fulop, N, et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ 2002; 325: 1263.
5 Care Quality Commission. Survey of Mental Health Inpatient Services. Care Quality Commission, 2009.
6 Healthcare Commission. Community Mental Health Service Users' Survey. Healthcare Commission, 2008.
7 Bee, P, Playle, J, Lovell, K, Barnes, P, Gray, R, Keeley, P. Service user views and expectations of UK-registered mental health nurses: a systematic review of empirical research. Int J Nurs Stud 2008; 45: 442–57.
8 The Mid Staffordshire Foundation Inquiry. Independent Inquiry into Care provided by Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust January 2005–March 2009, vols 1,2. TSO (The Stationery Office), 2013.
9 Munro, K, Ross, KM, Reid, M. User involvement in mental health: time to face up to the challenges of meaningful involvement? Int J Ment Health Promot 2006; 8: 3744.
10 Higgins, J, Green, S (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
11 Tong, A, Sainsbury, P, Craig, J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19: 349–57.
12 Carlson, MD, Morrison, RS. Study design, precision, and validity in observational studies. J Palliat Med 2009; 12: 7782.
13 Dixon-Woods, M, Agarwal, S, Jones, D, Young, B, Sutton, A. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005; 10: 4553.
14 Popay, J, Roberts, H, Sowden, A, Petticrew, M, Arai, L, Rodgers, M, et al. Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews. A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Institute of Health Research, University of Lancaster, 2006.
15 Thomas, J, Harden, A, Oakley, A, Oliver, S, Sutcliffe, K, Rees, R, et al. Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews. BMJ 2004; 328: 1010–2.
16 Spencer, L, Ritchie, J, Lewis, J, Dillon, L. Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A Framework for Assessing Research Evidence. Government Chief Social Researcher's Office, 2003.
17 BSA Medical Sociological Group. Criteria for the evaluation of qualitative research papers. Medical Sociology News 1996; 22: 6871.
18 Mead, N, Bower, P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51: 1087–110.
19 Makoul, G, Clayman, ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 60: 301–12.
20 Hickey, G, Kipping, C. Exploring the concept of user involvement in mental health through a participation continuum. J Clin Nurs 1998; 7: 83–8.
21 Rethink, Adfam. Living with Severe Mental Health and Substance Use Problems: Report from the Rethink Dual Diagnosis Research Group. Rethink & Adfam, 2004.
22 Antoniou, J, Estop, G, Gilburt, H. Advance Directives in 2006: A Report. Rethink, 2006.
23 Faulkner, A, Williams, K. Future Perfect. Rethink, 2005.
24 Pitt, L, Kilbride, M, Nothard, S, Welford, M, Morrison, AP. Researching recovery from psychosis: a user-led project. Psychiatr Bull 2007; 31: 5560.
25 Tee, S, Lathlean, J, Herbert, L, Coldham, T, East, B, Johnson, TJ. User participation in mental health nurse decision-making: a co-operative enquiry. J Adv Nurs 2007; 60: 135–45.
26 Bramesfeld, A, Wedegartner, F, Elgeti, H, Bisson, S. How does mental health care perform in respect to service users' expectations? Evaluating inpatient and outpatient care in Germany with the WHO responsiveness concept. BMC Health Serv Res 2007; 7: 99.
27 Healthcare Commission. Patient Survey Report 2004. Picker Institute: Europe, 2004.
28 Healthcare Commission. No Voice, No Choice: A Joint Review of Adult Community Mental Health Services in England. Healthcare Commission, 2007.
29 Howard, PB, El-Mallakh, P, Kay Rayens, M, Clark, JJ. Consumer perspectives on quality of inpatient mental health services. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2003; 17: 205–17.
30 Schene, AH, Van Wijngaarden, B. A survey of an organization for families of patients with serious mental illness in The Netherlands. Psychiatr Serv 1995; 46: 807–13.
31 Rose, D, Ford, R, Lindley, P, Gawith, L, KCW Mental Health Monitoring Users' Group. In Our Experience: User-focused Monitoring of Mental Health Services in Kensington & Chelsea and Westminster Health Authority. Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 1998.
32 Warner, L. Back on Track: CPA Care Planning for Service Users Who Are Repeatedly Detained Under the Mental Health Act. Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 2005.
33 Borneo, A. Your Choice. Results from the Your Treatment, Your Choice Survey: Final Report. Rethink, 2008.
34 Turner, D. Recovery in NSF ‘Wild Geese’. National Schizophrenia Fellowship, 2001.
35 Hope, R. The Ten Essential Shared Capabilities – A Framework for the Whole of the Mental Health Workforce. Department of Health, 2004.
36 Tessler, RC, Gamache, GM, Fisher, GA. Patterns of contact of patients' families with mental health professionals and attitudes toward professionals. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1991; 42: 929–35.
37 Whelton, C, Pawlick, J, Cardamone, J. Involving families in psychosocial rehabilitation. Psychiatr Rehabil J 1997; 20: 5760.
38 Wooff, D, Schneider, J, Carpenter, J, Brandon, T. Correlates of stress in carers. J Ment Health 2003; 12: 2940.
39 Rose, D. Users' Voices: The Perspectives of Mental Health Service Users on Community and Hospital Care. Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 2001.
40 Woltmann, E, Whitley, R. Shared decision making in public mental health care: perspectives from consumers living with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Rehabil J 2010; 34: 2936.
41 Goodwin, V, Happell, B. In our own words: consumers' views on the reality of consumer participation in mental health care. Contemp Nurse 2006; 21: 413.
42 Dobie, MS, Bulia, S, Swanke, J. Patient-centered mental health care: encouraging caregiver participation. Care Manag J 2010; 11: 146–50.
43 Piippo, J, Aaltonen, J. Mental health care: trust and mistrust in different caring contexts. J Clin Nurs 2008; 17: 2867–74.
44 Cambridge, P, Forrester-Jones, R, Carpenter, J, Tate, A, Knapp, M, Beecham, J, et al. The state of care management in learning disability and mental health services 12 years into community care. Br J Soc Work 2005; 35: 1039–62.
45 Daremo, A, Haglund, L. Activity and participation in psychiatric institutional care. Scand J Occup Ther 2008; 15: 131–42.
46 Rose, D. Partnership, co-ordination of care and the place of user involvement. J Ment Health 2003; 12: 5970.
47 Perkins, RE, Fisher, NR. Beyond mere existence: the auditing of care plans. J Ment Health 1996; 5: 275–86.
48 Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health. Acute Problems: A Survey of the Quality of Care in Acute Psychiatric Wards. Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 1998.
49 Williams, CC. Discharge planning process on a general psychiatry unit. Soc Work Ment Health 2003; 2: 1731.
50 Schmidt-Posner, J, Jerrell, JM. Qualitative analysis of three case management programs. Community Ment Health J 1998; 34: 381–92.
51 Schroder, AG, Ahlstrom, G, Larsson, BW. Patients' perceptions of the concept of the quality of care in the psychiatric setting: a phenomenographic study. J Clin Nurs 2006; 15: 93102.
52 Murphy, N, Cutts, H. Can the introduction of a quality of life tool affect individual professional practice and the quality of care planning in a community mental health team? J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2009; 16: 941–6.
53 Sutherby, K, Szmukler, GI, Halpern, A, Alexander, M, Thornicroft, G, Johnson, C, et al. A study of ‘crisis cards’ in a community psychiatric service. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1999; 100: 5661.
54 Amering, M, Stastny, P, Hopper, K. Psychiatric advance directives: qualitative study of informed deliberations by mental health service users. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 186: 247–52.
55 Oshima, I, Cho, N, Takahashi, K. Effective components of a nationwide case management program in Japan for individuals with severe mental illness. Community Ment Health J 2004; 40: 525–37.
56 Henderson, C, Jackson, C, Slade, M, Young, AS, Strauss, JL. How should we implement psychiatric advance directives? Views of consumers, caregivers, mental health providers and researchers. Adm Policy Ment Health 2010; 37: 447–58.
57 Alegria, M, Polo, A, Gao, S, Santana, L, Rothstein, D, Jimenez, A, et al. Evaluation of a patient activation and empowerment intervention in mental health care. Med Care 2008; 46: 247–56.
58 Chan, S, MacKenzie, A, Ng, DT, Leung, JK. An evaluation of the implementation of case management in the community psychiatric nursing service. J Adv Nurs 2000; 31: 144–56.
59 Eisen, SV, Dickey, B, Sederer, LI. A self-report symptom and problem rating scale to increase inpatients' involvement in treatment. Psychiatr Serv 2000; 51: 349–53.
60 Macpherson, R, Summerfield, L, Haynes, R, Slade, M, Foy, C. The use of carers' and users' expectations of services (CUES) in an epidemiological survey of need. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2005; 51: 3543.
61 O'Donnell, M, Proberts, M, Parker, G. Development of a consumer advocacy program. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 1998; 32: 873–9.
62 Beeforth, M, Colan, E, Graley, R. Have We Got Views for You. Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 1994.
63 Berger, JL. Incorporation of the tidal model into the interdisciplinary plan of care – a program quality improvement project. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2006; 13: 464–7.
64 Webb, Y, Clifford, P, Fowler, V, Morgan, C, Hanson, M. Comparing patients' experience of mental health services in England: a five-Trust survey. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv 2000; 13: 273–81.
65 Lakeman, R. Practice standards to improve the quality of family and carer participation in adult mental health care: an overview and evaluation. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2008, 17: 4456.
66 Sandlund, M, Hansson, L. Patient satisfaction in a comprehensive sectorized psychiatric service: study of a 1-year-treated incidence cohort. Nord J Psychiatry 1999; 53: 305–12.
67 Cresswell, J, Lelliott, P (eds). Accreditation for Inpatient Mental Health Services (AIMS): National Report for Working Age Acute Wards: July 2007–July 2009. Royal College of Psychiatrists' Centre for Quality Improvement, 2009.
68 Bowers, L. Monitoring the outcome of case management and community care: the care programme approach support system (CPASS). J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 1997; 4: 3744.
69 Perreault, M, Paquin, G, Kennedy, S, Desmarais, J, Tardif, H. Patients' perspective on their relatives' involvement in treatment during a short-term psychiatric hospitalization. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1999; 34: 157–65.
70 Rethink, Mind. New Horizons Engagement Event: People Who Use Mental Health Services And Carers. Rethink & Mind, 2009.
71 Marshall, TB, Solomon, P. Releasing information to families of persons with severe mental illness: a survey of NAMI members. Psychiatr Serv 2000; 51: 1006–11.
72 McDermott, G. The care programme approach: a patient perspective. Nurs Times 1998; 94: 57–9.
73 Allen, C. The care programme approach: the experiences and views of carers. Ment Health Care 1998; 1: 160–2.
74 Brown, Z. The care programme approach – the service user's view. Soc Serv Res 1998; 4: 5566.
75 Storm, M, Davidson, L. Inpatients' and providers' experiences with user involvement in inpatient care. Psychiatr Q 2010; 81: 111–25.
76 Tanenbaum, SJ. Psychiatrist–consumer relationships in US public mental health care: consumers' views of a disability system. Disabil Soc 2009; 24: 727–38.
77 Walsh, J, Boyle, J. Improving acute psychiatric hospital services according to inpatient experiences. A user-led piece of research as a means to empowerment. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2009; 30: 31–8.
78 Askey, R, Holmshaw, J, Gamble, C, Gray, R. What do carers of people with psychosis need from mental health services? Exploring the views of carers, service users and professionals. J Fam Ther 2009; 31: 310–31.
79 McAuliffe, D, Andriske, L, Moller, E, O'Brien, M, Breslin, P, Hickey, P. ‘Who cares?’ An exploratory study of carer needs in adult mental health. Aust e-J Adv Ment Health 2009; 8: 112.
80 Svensson, B, Hansson, L. Patient satisfaction with inpatient psychiatric care: the influence of personality traits, diagnosis and perceived coercion. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1994; 90: 379–84.
81 Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health. Pulling Together: The Future Roles and Training of Mental Health Staff. Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 1997.
82 Simpson, A. Creating alliances: the views of users and carers on the education and training needs of community mental health nurses. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 1999; 6: 347–56.
83 Wolfe, J, Gournay, K, Norman, S, Ramnoruth, D. Care programme approach: evaluation of its implementation in an inner London service. Clin Eff Nurs 1997; 1: 8591.
84 Magorrian, K. Responding to the needs of carers of people with schizophrenia. Prof Nurs 2001; 17: 225–9.
85 O'Donovan, A. Patient-centred care in acute psychiatric admission units: reality or rhetoric? J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2007; 14: 542–8.
86 Princess Royal Trust for Carers. The Princess Royal Trust for Carers ‘Out of Hospital’ Project – Learning from the Pilot Projects Final Report – May 2010. Acton Shapiro, 2010.
87 Ford, R, Rose, D. Mental health. Heads and tales. Health Serv J 1997; 107: 28–9.
88 Loveland, B. The care programme approach: whose is it? Empowering users in the care programme process. Educational Action Research 1998; 6: 321–35.
89 Rea, CA, Rea, DM. Responding to user views of service performance. J Ment Health 2000; 9: 351–63.
90 Chinman, MJ, Allende, M, Weingarten, R, Steiner, J, Tworkowski, S, Davidson, L. On the road to collaborative treatment planning: consumer and provider perspectives. J Behav Health Serv Res 1999; 26: 211–8.
91 Bramesfeld, A, Klippel, U, Seidel, G, Schwartz, FW, Dierks, ML. How do patients expect the mental health service system to act? Testing the WHO responsiveness concept for its appropriateness in mental health care. Soc Sci Med 2007; 65: 880–9.
92 Ferry, JL, Abramson, JS. Toward understanding the clinical aspects of geriatric case management. Soc Work Health Care 2005; 42: 3556.
93 O'Brien, L. The relationship between community psychiatric nurses and clients with severe and persistent mental illness: the client's experience. Aust NZ J Ment Health Nurs 2001; 10: 176–86.
94 Schroder, A, Ahlstrom, G. Psychiatric care staff's and care associates' perceptions of the concept of quality of care: a qualitative study. Scan J Caring Sci 2004; 18: 204–12.
95 Goodwin, V, Happell, B. To be treated like a person: the role of the psychiatric nurse in promoting consumer and carer participation in mental health service delivery. J Psychiatr Nurs Res 2008; 14: 1766–75.
96 Diamond, B, Parkin, G, Morris, K, Bettinis, J, Bettesworth, C. User involvement: substance or spin? J Ment Health 2003; 12: 613–26.
97 Garcia, I, Kennett, C, Quraishi, M, Duncan, G. Acute Care 2004: A National Survey of Adult Psychiatric Wards in England. Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 2005.
98 Van Dorn, RA, Swanson, JW, Swartz, MS. Preferences for psychiatric advance directives among Latinos: views on advance care planning for mental health. Psychiatr Serv 2009; 60: 1383–5.
99 Alexander, J, Rogers, K, Simpson, R, Rigby, P. The value of client held records. Mental Health Nursing 2002; 22: 12–4.
100 Linhorst, DM, Hamilton, G, Young, E, Eckert, A. Opportunities and barriers to empowering people with severe mental illness through participation in treatment planning. Soc Work 2002; 47: 425–34.
101 Shaul, JA, Eisen, SV, Stringfellow, VL, Clarridge, BR, Hermann, RC, Nelson, D, et al. Use of consumer ratings for quality improvement in behavioral health insurance plans. J Comm J Qual Improv 2001; 27: 216–29.
102 Ware, NC, Tugenberg, T, Dickey, B. Practitioner relationships and quality of care for low-income persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2004; 55: 555–9.
103 Ceramidas, DM, Forn de Zita, C, Eklund, M, Kirsh, B. The 2009 world team of mental health occupational therapists: a resilient and dedicated workforce. The Bulletin: World Federation of Occupational Therapists 2009; 60: 917.
104 McCann, TV, Baird, J, Clark, E, Lu, S. Mental health professionals' attitudes towards consumer participation in inpatient units. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2008; 15: 10–6.
105 McCann, TV, Clark, E, Baird, J, Lu, S. Mental health clinicians' attitudes about consumer and consumer consultant participation in Australia: a cross-sectional survey design. Nurs Health Sci 2008; 10: 7884.
106 Goss, C, Moretti, F, Mazzi, MA, Del Piccolo, L, Rimondini, M, Zimmermann, C. Involving patients in decisions during psychiatric consultations. Br J Psychiatry 2008; 193: 416–21.
107 Barnes, D, Carpenter, J, Dickinson, C. The outcomes of partnerships with mental health service users in interprofessional education: a case study. Health Soc Care Community 2006; 14: 426–35.
108 Ennals, P, Fossey, E. The Occupational Performance History Interview in community mental health case management: consumer and occupational therapist perspectives. Aust Occup Ther J 2007; 54: 1121.
109 Coffey, DS. Connection and autonomy in the case management relationship. Psychiatr Rehabil J 2003; 26: 404–12.
110 Elbogen, EB, Swartz, MS, Van Dorn, R, Swanson, JW, Kim, M, Scheyett, A. Clinical decision making and views about psychiatric advance directives. Psychiatr Serv 2006; 57: 350–5.
111 Carpenter, J, Sbaraini, S. Involving service users and carers in the care programme approach. J Ment Health 1996; 5: 483–8.
112 Corring, DJ, Cook, JV. Client-centred care means that I am a valued human being. Can J Occup Ther 1999; 66: 7182.
113 Hamann, J, Langer, B, Winkler, V, Busch, R, Cohen, R, Leucht, S, et al. Shared decision making for in-patients with schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2006; 114: 265–73.
114 Beebe, TJ, Harrison, PA, McRae, JA, Asche, SE. Evaluating behavioral health services in Minnesota's Medicaid population using the Experience of Care and Health Outcomes (ECHO) Survey. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2003; 14: 608–21.
115 Corrigan, PW, Buican, B, McCracken, S. Can severely mentally ill adults reliably report their needs? J Nerv Ment Dis 1996; 184: 523–9.
116 Ostman, M, Wallsten, T, Kjellin, L. Family burden and relatives' participation in psychiatric care: are the patient's diagnosis and the relation to the patient of importance? Int J Soc Psychiatry 2005; 51: 291301.
117 Blenkiron, P, Mo, KH, Cuzen, J, Hammill, AC. Involving service users in their mental health care: the CUES Project. Psychiatr Bull 2003; 27: 334–8.
118 Henderson, C, Swanson, JW, Szmukler, G, Thornicroft, G, Zinkler, M. A typology of advance statements in mental health care. Psychiatr Serv 2008; 59: 6371.
119 Henderson, C, Lee, R, Herman, D, Dragasti, D. From psychiatric advance directives to the joint crisis plan. Psychiatr Serv 2009; 60: 1390–1.
120 Swanson, JW, Swartz, MS, Elbogen, EB, Van Dorn, RA, Ferron, J, Wagner, HR, et al. Facilitated psychiatric advance directives: a randomized trial of an intervention to foster advance treatment planning among persons with severe mental illness. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163: 1943–51.
121 Van Dorn, RA, Swanson, JW, Swartz, MS, Elbogen, E, Ferron, J. Reducing barriers to completing psychiatric advance directives. Adm Policy Ment Health 2008; 35: 440–8.
122 Elbogen, E, Swanson, JW, Appelbaum, PS, Swartz, MS, Ferron, J, Van Dorn, RA, et al. Competence to complete psychiatric advance directives: effects of facilitated decision making. Law Hum Behav 2007; 31: 275–89.
123 Kim, MM, Van Dorn, RA, Scheyett, AM, Elbogen, EE, Swanson, JW, Swartz, MS, et al. Understanding the personal and clinical utility of psychiatric advance directives: a qualitative perspective. Psychiatry 2007; 70: 1929.
124 Papageorgiou, A, King, M, Janmohamed, A, Davidson, O, Dawson, J. Advance directives for patients compulsorily admitted to hospital with serious mental illness. Randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2002; 181: 513–9.
125 Srebnik, DS, Russo, J. Consistency of psychiatric crisis care with advance directive instructions. Psychiatr Serv 2007; 58: 1157–63.
126 Papageorgiou, A, Janmohamed, A, King, M, Davidson, O, Dawson, J. Advance directives for patients compulsorily admitted to hospital with serious mental disorders: directive content and feedback from patients and professionals. J Ment Health 2004; 13: 379–88.
127 Hansen, T, Hatling, T, Lidal, E, Ruud, T. The user perspective: respected or rejected in mental health care? J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2004; 11: 292–7.
128 Angell, B, Mahoney, C. Reconceptualizing the case management relationship in intensive treatment: a study of staff perceptions and experiences. Adm Policy Ment Health 2007; 34: 172–88.
129 Lawn, S, Battersby, MW, Pols, RG, Lawrence, J, Parry, T, Urukalo, M. The mental health expert patient: findings from a pilot study of a generic chronic condition self-management programme for people with mental illness. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2007; 53: 6374.
130 Richards, D, Bee, P, Loftus, S, Baker, J, Bailey, L, Lovell, K. Specialist educational intervention for acute inpatient mental health nursing staff: service user views and effects on nursing quality. J Adv Nurs 2005; 51: 634–44.
131 Ryan, T, Pearsall, A, Hatfield, B, Poole, R. Long term care for serious mental illness outside the NHS: a study of out of area placements. J Ment Health 2004; 13: 425–9.
132 Social Action for Health. Hear I Am: Mental Health Service Users, Ward Life and Relationships. Social Action for Health, 2010.
133 Modrcin, M, Rapp, CA, Poertner, J. The evaluation of case management services with the chronically mentally ill. Eval Program Plann 1988; 11: 307–14.
134 Livingston, JD, Nijdam-Jones, A, Team, P.E.E.R. Perceptions of treatment planning in a forensic mental health hospital: a qualitative participatory action research study. Int J Forensic Ment Health 2013; 12: 4252.
135 Shields, LS, Pathare, S, van Zelst, SDM, Dijkkamp, S, Narasimhan, L, Bunders, JG. Unpacking the psychiatric advance directive in low resource settings: an exploratory qualitative study in Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Ment Health Syst 2013; 7: 29.
136 Patton, D. Strategic direction or operational confusion: level of service user involvement in Irish acute admission unit care. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2013; 20: 387–95.
137 Van der Ham, AJ, Voskes, Y, van Kempen, N, Broerse, JEW, Widdershoven, GA. The implementation of psychiatric advance directives: experiences from a Dutch crisis card initiative. Psychiatr Rehabil J 2013; 36: 119–21.
138 Rogers, B, Dunne, E. A qualitative study on the use of the care programme approach with individuals with borderline personality disorder: a service user perspective. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 2013; 51: 3845.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • ISSN: 0007-1250
  • EISSN: 1472-1465
  • URL: /core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to service user-led care planning

  • Penny Bee (a1), Owen Price (a1), John Baker (a1) and Karina Lovell (a1)
Submit a response

eLetters

How can we best equip service users with the knowledge and understanding to lead their own care planning? And what advantages can this bring to patients suffering from mental ill health?

Rachel A Cichosz, Medical Student, Cardiff University
07 September 2015

Bee et al (2015) explored some possible reasons for the lack of user-led care planning in mental health services and why, despite evidence that service users would like more involvement in decisions about their care, there has been little change in clinical practice (Care Quality Commission, 2009). It is important that patients feel empowered to be involved in joint decision making and a key aspect of this is their own confidence that they have sufficient knowledge and resources to make the ‘right’ decisions. The question is, how can we best equip service users with this knowledge?

Several studies confirm that service users receive insufficient information to enable them to have a meaningful contribution to discussions about their care (Bee et al, 2015). At a time when Mental Health Resources are under stress, it is easy to see how this aspect of care could be neglected. Simply explaining to patients where they can find reliable information on their condition, should they choose to, is a quick and easy way of helping them to build evidence- based knowledge whilst engaging them in their own care.

It is important to remember that there are clear advantages for patients as well as health care professionals. Increased autonomy can lead to increased patient satisfaction, with evidence that involvement in care planning increases compliance and aids recovery (Thompson and McCabe, 2012). Increased compliance can reduce clinical and economic burdens (Thompson and McCabe, 2012). The next step is researching and educating mental health professionals on the importance of service user knowledge and how they can best help with this.

References:

Bee. P., Price. O., Baker. J. and Lovell. K. 2015. Systematic Synthesis of Barriers and Facilitators to Service User-Led Care Planning. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 207:104-114.

Care Quality Commission. 2009. Survey of Mental Health Inpatient Services. Care Quality Commission.

Thompson. L. and McCabe. R. 2012. The Effect of Clinician-Patient Alliance and Communication on Treatment Adherence in Mental Health Care: A Systematic Review. BMC Psychiatry. 12:87.

... More

Conflict of interest: None Declared

Write a reply

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *