No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Challenging the entrepreneurial discourse around women home-based workers’ empowerment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2023
Abstract
This article explores dominant entrepreneurship discourse and practice surrounding informal women home-based workers, and their relationship to goals of individual empowerment. We argue that conventional neoliberal entrepreneurship discourse conflates empowerment and performativity, linking the capacity of women to develop greater agency with their incorporation into an economic regime with predetermined roles, labelled ‘empowerment’. Applying a critical lens, we analyse the development discourse on entrepreneurship and economic performativity in these terms – looking to understand the characteristics of empowerment concerning home-based workers in Bangladesh working for a fair-trade organisation and a domestic garment supply chain. We argue that the conflation of empowerment and performativity serves the convenience of neoliberal ideology rather than the empowerment needs of those to whom such discourses are applied. To complement our critique, based on the empowerment literature, we develop a conceptual framework of empowerment and agency encompassing individual and collective agency, considering these in light of the relationship between performativity and social reproduction. Coupling a more nuanced understanding of empowerment to the critique of the entrepreneurial discourse, as applied to women home-based workers, provides a theoretical contribution to the empowerment and entrepreneurial discourse literature.
Keywords
- Type
- Gender, power and work
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s) 2022
References
Acosta-Belén, E, Bose, CE (1990) From structural subordination to empowerment: women and development in third world contexts. Gender and Society 4(3): 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergeron, S (2011) Economics, performativity, and social reproduction in global development. Globalizations 8(2): 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, T (ed). (2017). Social Reproduction Theory: Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression. London, UK: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeri, N (2018) Challenging the gendered entrepreneurial subject: gender, development, and the informal economy in India. Gender & Society 32(2): 157–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldeman, L (2007) The Cult of the Market: Economic Fundamentalism and its Discontents. Canberra, Australia: ANU E Press.Google Scholar
Calvès, A (2009) Empowerment: the history of a key concept in contemporary development discourse. Revue Tiers Monde 4: 735–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornwall, A, Rivas, A-M (2015) From ‘gender equality and ‘women’s empowerment’ to global justice: reclaiming a transformative agenda for gender and development. Third World Quarterly 36(2): 396–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, JW (1998) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Delaney, A, Burchielli, R, Marshall, , et al. (2019) Homeworking Women: A Gender Justice Perspective. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dey, P (2010) The symbolic violence of ‘social entrepreneurship’: language, power and the question of the social (subject). In: Third Research Colloquium on Social Entrepreneurship, Saїd Business School, University of Oxford, 22–25 June 2010.Google Scholar
Emmerij, L, Jolly, R, Weiss, TG (2005) Economic and social thinking at the UN in historical perspective. Development and Change 36(2): 211–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federici, S (2012) Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction and Feminist Struggle. Oakland, CA: PM Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, N (2017) Crisis of care? On the social-reproductive contradictions of contemporary capitalism. In: Bhattachaya, T (ed) Social Reproduction Theory: Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression. London, UK: Pluto Press, pp. 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, J (1992) Empowerment: The Politics of Alternative Development. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gammage, S, Kabeer, N, van der Meulen Rodgers, Y (2016) Voice and agency: where are we now? Feminist Economics 22(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulding, C (2005) Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology. European Journal of Marketing 39(3/4): 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D (2007) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kabeer, N (1999) Resources, agency, achievements: reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change 30(3): 435–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabeer, N (2001) Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. In: Kabeer, N (ed) Discussing Women’s Empowerment: Theory and Practice. Stockholm, Sweden: SIDA: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.Google Scholar
Kabeer, N (2005) Gender equality and women’s empowerment: a critical analysis of the third millennium development goal. Gender and Development 13(2): 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabeer, N (2008) Mainstreaming Gender in Social Protection for the Informal Economy. London, UK: Commonwealth Secretariat.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabeer, N (2016) Gender equality, economic growth, and women’s agency: the “Endless Variety” and “Monotonous Similarity” of patriarchal constraints. Feminist Economics 22(1): 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabeer, N (2017) Economic pathways to women’s empowerment and active citizenship: what does the evidence from Bangladesh tell us? The Journal of Development Studies 53(5): 649–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauksch, S (2018) It is exactly what it was in me: the performativity of social entrepreneurship. In: Dey, P, Steyaert, C (eds) Social Entrepreneurship: An Affirmative Critique. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezzadri, A (2019) On the value of social reproduction: informal labour, the majority world and the need for inclusive theories and politics. Radical Philosophy 2(4): 33–41.Google Scholar
Mies, M (2014) Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour. London, UK: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M (2001) Empowerment at last? Journal of International Development 13(3): 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayan, D (2002) Empowerment and Poverty Reduction: A Source Book. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Narayan, D (2005) Measuring Empowerment: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Nazreen, S, Hossain, N, Sultan, M (2011) National Discourses on Women’s Empowerment in Bangladesh: Continuities and Change. London, UK: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M (2001) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parpart, JL, Rai, SM, Staudt, K (2002) Rethinking em(power)ment, gender and development: An introduction. In: Parpart, JL, Rai, SM, Staudt, K (eds) Rethinking Empowerment: Gender and Development in a Global/Local World. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
Sen, G, Grown, C (1987) Development, Crises and Alternative Visions: Third World Women’s Perspectives. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Siddiqui, D (2009) Do Bangladeshi women need saving? Sisterhood in the post –sweatshop era. Feminist Review 91: 54–174.Google Scholar
Touwen-van der Kooij, A (1996) Gender and Development in Zambia: Empowerment of Women through Local Non-Governmental Organizations. Delft, Netherlands: Eburon Publishers.Google Scholar
Webb, JW, Bruton, GD, Tihanyi, LS, et al. (2013) Research on entrepreneurship in the informal economy: framing a research agenda. Journal of Business Venturing 28(5): 598–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2001) World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar