Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T06:12:34.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Occupational and environmental safety standards in nanotechnology: International Organization for Standardization, Latin America and beyond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Guillermo Foladori*
Affiliation:
Universidad Autonoma de Zacatecas, Mexico
*
Guillermo Foladori, Unidad Académica en Estudios del Desarrollo, Universidad Autonoma de Zacatecas, Av. Preparatoria S/N, Col. Hidráulica, Zacatecas 98000, Mexico. Email: gfoladori@gmail.com

Abstract

In the absence of government safety regulation in the field of nanotechnology, ISO standards are being used as the basis for establishing technical and management guidelines at an international level. There are more than 50 current ISO standards on nanotechnology. Some of these relate to the working environment and occupational risk management. In Latin America, entities that are members of ISO are enunciating national versions of the international standards. In this article, this context is analysed critically, starting from the Mexican standard on occupational risk management in the working environment. Even though risk management standards may guarantee better and safer working conditions, in the field of nanotechnology, they simultaneously unlock detrimental implications for workers and society. Reliance on such private and voluntary forms of industry self-regulation is identified as a by-product of global neoliberalism.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appelbaum, R, Záyago Lau, E, Foladori, G, et al . (2016) Inventory of nanotechnology companies in Mexico. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 18(2): 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagattolli, C, Invernizzi, N (2016) Difusión de la nanotecnología en Brasil. Análisis preliminar a partir de la Encuesta de Innovación Tecnológica 2011. In: Foladori, G, Invernizzi, N, Záyago Lau, E, et al . (eds) Nanotecnologías en América Latina. Trabajo y Regulación. México: Miguel Ángel Porrúa, pp. 233250.Google Scholar
Blackett, A, Trebilcock, A (2015) Research Handbook on Transnational Labour Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazilian Industrial Development Agency (ABDI) (2011) Nanotecnología. Panorama da nanotecnologia no mundo e no Brasil. Agência Brasileira de Desenvolvimento Industrial. Available at: http://www.desenvolvimento.gov.br/arquivos/dwnl_1266607883.pdf (accessed 1 July 2016).Google Scholar
Brenner, MD, Fairris, D, Ruser, J (2004) ‘Flexible’ work practices and occupational safety and health: exploring the relationship between cumulative trauma disorders and workplace transformation. Industrial Relations 43(1): 242266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (BAuA) (2007) Guidance for handling and use of nanomaterials at the workplace. Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Available at: http://www.baua.de/en/Topics-from-A-to-Z/Hazardous-Substances/Nanotechnology/pdf/guidance.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2 (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar
Callaghan, N, Schnoll, L (n.d.) ISO 9000 for small companies. Quality Digest. Available at: http://www.qualitydigest.com/aug97/html/cover.html (accessed 10 June2017).Google Scholar
Cilona, O (2013) Trade union involvement in non-technical standardization. Hesamag 7: 2830. Available at: http://www.etui.org/Topics/Health-Safety-working-conditions/HesaMag/(offset)/allI (accessed 23 June 2016).Google Scholar
Clapp, J (1998) The privatization of global environmental governance: ISO 14000 and the developing world. Global Governance 4(3): 295316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colvin, VL (2003) The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials. Nature Biotechnology 21(10): 11661170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delmas, M (2000) Barriers and incentives to the adoption of ISO 14001 by firms in the United States. Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum 11(1): 138.Google Scholar
Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion (2013) Guidance on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the potential risks related to nanomaterials at work. European Commission. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=13087 (accessed 12 June 2017).Google Scholar
European Environmental Agency (EEA) (2002) Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896–2000 – European environment agency. Available at: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental_issue_report_2001_22 (accessed 24 June 2016).Google Scholar
European Environmental Agency (EEA) (2013) Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution, innovation. EEA, Report no. 1/2013, 22 January. Available at: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/late-lessons-2 (accessed 12 June 2017).Google Scholar
European Union Legislation (2000) The precautionary principle. Summaries of EU Legislation. Available at: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/consumers/consumer_safety/l32042_en.htm (accessed 24 November 2014).Google Scholar
Executive Office of the President of the United States (2005) The National Nanotechnology Initiative: research and development leading to a revolution in technology and industry (Supplement to the President’s 2006 Budget). Report, National Nanotechnology Initiative, July. Available at: http://www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/pub_resource/nni_07budget.pdf (accessed 18 October 2006).Google Scholar
Faure, M (1995) Enforcement issues for environmental legislation in developing countries. UNU/INTECH, Working paper no. 19 , March. Maastricht: United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies.Google Scholar
Foladori, G, Lau, EZ, Carroza, T, et al . (2017) Sectorial analysis of nanotechnology companies in Argentina. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 19(6): 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Instituto Argentino de Normalización y Certificación (IRAM) (n.d.) Búsqueda de Normas. Available at: http://catalogo.iram.org.ar/carritoiram/BuscaInicialCD.asp (accessed 17 June 2016).Google Scholar
Instituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas y Certificación (ICONTEC) (n.d.) Normalización Comité 243 Nanotecnología. Available at: http://www.icontec.org/Ser/Nor/Paginas/CTN/Ct243.aspx (accessed 1 July 2016).Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI) (2014) Encuesta sobre Investigación y desarrollo tecnológico y módulo sobre actividades de biotecnología y nanotecnología 2012 Síntesis metodológica ESIDET – MBN. Aguascalientes, Mexico: INEGI.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Higiene ‘Rafael Rangel’ (2015) Registro Sanitario de Especialidades Farmacéuticas con Nanotecnología. National Standard.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization (ILO) (2013) Further developments in relation to the International Organization for Standardization, including in the field of occupational safety and health (OSH). Available at: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_norm/—relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_222296.pdf (accessed 7 July 2016).Google Scholar
International Labour Organization (ILO) (2014) Guide to International Labour Standards. Turin: ILO. Available at: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_norm/—normes/documents/publication/wcms_246945.pdf (accessed 8 July 2016).Google Scholar
International Labour Organization (ILO) (2015) Review of the implementation of ILO–ISO agreements (GB.325/INS/11). Available at: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_norm/—relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_420998.pdf (accessed 13 July 2016).Google Scholar
International Labour Organization (ILO), International Social Security Association (ISSA) and Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA) (2008) Seoul declaration on safety and health at work: the safety and health summit. Seoul Declaration Organization. Available at: www.seouldeclaration.org (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (n.d.-a) About ISO. Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/about.htm (accessed 11 July 2016a).Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (n.d.-b) ISO – technical committees (ISO/TC 229: Nanotechnologies Standards Development). Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_technical_committee?commid=381983 (accessed 25 November 2014b).Google Scholar
International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) (2014) La ISO no pasa el examen. Available at: http://www.ituc-csi.org/la-iso-no-pasa-el-examen (accessed 30 June 2016).Google Scholar
Jachtenfuchs, M (2001) The governance approach to European integration. Journal of Common Market Studies 39(2): 245264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, A, Aitken, R, Butz, T, et al . (2006) Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nanotechnology 444(16): 267269.Google ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2009) Approaches to safe nanotechnology. CDC . Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2009-25/pdfs/2009-125.pdf (accessed 24 November 2014).Google Scholar
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2012) General safe practices for working with engineered nanomaterials in research laboratories. CDC . Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2012–147/ (accessed 13 January 2015).Google Scholar
National Research Council (2008) Research on future skill demands: a workshop summary (ed M Hilton). Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Available at: https://www.nap.edu/download/12066 (accessed 17 June 2017).Google Scholar
Naveh, E, Marcus, A (2007) Financial performance, ISO 9000 standard and safe driving practices effects on accident rate in the U.S. motor carrier industry. Accident Analysis and Prevention 39(4): 731742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oberdörster, G, Oberdörster, E, Oberdörster, J (2005) Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environmental Health Perspectives 113(7): 823839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT) (2014) Guía sobre las normas internacionales del trabajo 2014. Available at: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_norm/—normes/documents/publication/wcms_246945.pdf (accessed 8 July 2016).Google Scholar
Pan America Health Organization (2005) Report on the Regional Evaluation of Municipal Solid Waste Management Services in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization.Google Scholar
Parker, M (2015) A union strategy for skilled work and technological change. Labor Notes, 9 August. Available at: http://www.net4dem.org/cyrev/archive/issue6/articles/UnionStrategy/UnionStrategy.pdf (accessed 30 June 2016).Google Scholar
Parker, M, Slaughter, J (1988) Choosing Sides: Unions and the Team Concept. Boston, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Poland, CA, Duffin, R, Kinloch, I, et al . (2008) Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nature Nanotechnology 3: 423428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Public Services International (PSI) (2015) ILC 2015 Agenda: the current status of ILO standards on occupational safety and health systems in respect of management, requirements and guidance for use. Available at: http://www.world-psi.org/sites/default/files/attachment/news/en_104th_ilc_agenda_item_iv_on_social_protection.pdf (accessed 7 July 2016).Google Scholar
Public Services International (PSI) (2016) No to privatization of occupational health and safety! Available at: http://www.world-psi.org/sites/default/files/attachment/media/en_iso-ohs_pr_final.pdf (accessed 7 July 2016).Google Scholar
Robertson, H (2016) A New ISO Standard for Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems: Is This The Right Approach? 3rd ed. ETUI Policy Brief. Available at: http://www.etui.org/content/download/23279/193994/file/ISO+OSH+management+systems+Robertson+2016.03.pdf (accessed 12 June 2017).Google Scholar
Rothery, B (1998) Standards and certification. In: Lock, D (ed.) The Gower Handbook of Management. 4th ed. Aldershot; Brookfield, VT: Gower Publishing Company, pp. 199210.Google Scholar
Sargent, J (2013) Nanotechnology: a policy primer. CRS Report for congress. Available at: https://www.google.com.br/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=W-S0Vcf1CYeq8wfsn4SwAg&gws_rd=ssl#q=sargent+nanotechnology (accessed 26 July 2015).Google Scholar
Scott, WR (1995) Institutions and Organisations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Secretaría de Economía (2016) Nanotecnologías – Gestión de riesgo ocupacional aplicado a nanomateriales manufacturados. Parte 1: Principios y enfoques. Available at: http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5477511&fecha=24/03/2017 (accessed 19 June 2017).Google Scholar
Smith, C (2015) Continuity and change in labor process analysis forty years after labor and monopoly capital. Labour Studies Journal 40(3): 222242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The European Parliament – The Council (2009) Cosmetic products (applicable from 2013). Regulation (EC) No. 1223/2009. Available at: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/consumers/product_labelling_and_packaging/co0013_en.htm (accessed 12 June 2017).Google Scholar
The European Parliament – The Council (2011) On the provision of food information to consumers. Regulation (EU) No. 1169/2011. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:304:0018:0063:EN:PDF (accessed 13 June 2017).Google Scholar
The European Parliament – The Council (2012) Regulation of the European parliament and of the Council concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (PE-CONS 2/12, Common Guidelines). Available at: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/12/pe00/pe00003.en12.pdf (accessed 13 June 2017).Google Scholar
Thompson, P (1989). Ne Mature of Work: An Introduction to Debates on the Labour Process. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Urquijo, W (2014) Regulación de las nanotecnologías en América Latina. Observatorio Del Desarrollo 3(12): 1518.Google Scholar
Webb, K (2012) ISO 26000: bridging the public/private divide in transnational business governance interactions. Comparative Research in Law & Political Economy Research, Report no. 21/2012. Osgoode Hall, ON: York University. Available at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1030&context=clpe (accessed 7 July 2016).Google Scholar
Winterton, J (2009) Competence across Europe: highest common factor or lowest common denominator? Journal of European Industrial Training 33(8–9): 681700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Economic Forum (WEF) (2016) Human capital report. Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/HCR2016_Main_Report.pdfGoogle Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2017) Technical information on technical barriers to trade. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tbt_e/tbt_info_e.htm (accessed 18 June 2017).Google Scholar
Ximénez Saenz, D, Martínez, OA (1998) Los trabajadores y las normas ISO 9000. Taller de Estudios Laborales. Unión Obrero Metalúrgica. Available at: http://www.tel.org.ar/spip/descarga/iso9000.pdf (accessed 30 June 2016).Google Scholar