Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T15:26:52.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Governmental Support to the Theatre in Great Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2010

Extract

General acceptance of the concept of theatre as an institution possessing positive values worthy of public support is a comparatively recent development in the history of the British theatre. The traditional public attitudes which were unfavorable to theatre (focal point of disorder, disease, moral corruption, and sinful activity) were created during the sixteenth-century power struggle between the Crown, London authorities, and the Church. The formulation of public attitudes favorable to theatre (aesthetic, social, moral, and intellectual stimuli) began when theatre became an agent of social change in the nineteenth century.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society for Theatre Research 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Whitworth, Geoffrey, The Making of a National Theatre (London: Faber and Faber, Ltd., 1951), p. 157.Google Scholar

2 James, D. G. (ed.), The Universities and the Theatre (London: George Allen and Unwin, Ltd., 1952), p. 103.Google Scholar

3 Whitworth, , op. cit., pp. 232233.Google Scholar

4 Dean, Basil, The Theatre at War (London: Methuen and Company, Ltd., 1956), p. 537.Google Scholar

5 Priestly, J. B., Theatre Outlook (London: Nicholson and Watson, 1947), p. 70.Google Scholar

6 Whitworth, , op. cit., p. 216.Google Scholar

7 Granville-Barker, Harley, The Study of Drama (Cambridge: University Press, 1934), pp. 910.Google Scholar

8 Irving, Henry, The Theatre and the State (Boston: Richard G. Badger and Company, 1898), p. 14.Google Scholar

9 Whitworth, , op. cit., pp. 176177.Google Scholar

10 Marowitz, Charles, “Talk With Tynan,” Encore (July-August, 1963), 10.Google Scholar

11 Whitworth, , op. cit., pp. 6870.Google Scholar

12 Ibid., pp. 100–113.

13 Ibid., p. 167.

14 Ibid., pp. 125–127.

15 Ibid., p. 171.

16 Ibid., p. 210.

17 Ibid., pp. 222–225.

18 The Manchester Guardian, July 14, 1951, p. 3.

19 The Times (London), March 22,1961, p. 12.

20 The Manchester Guardian, June 7, 1961, p. 3.

21 James, , op. cit., p. 112.Google Scholar

22 Priestly, , op. cit., p. 69.Google Scholar

23 Brown, Ivor, “The Public and the Play,” Drama (Summer, 1962), 27.Google Scholar

24 Shaw, George Bernard, “The Censorship of the Stage in England,” Shaw on Theatre, ed. West, E. J. (New York: Hill and Wang, 1958), p. 79.Google Scholar

25 Dean, , op. cit., p. 138.Google Scholar

26 The Times, September 8, 1945, p. 5.

27 Dean, , op. cit., p. 529.Google Scholar

28 Williams, W. E., The Arts and Public Patronage (London: The Arts Council of Great Britain, 1958), p. 2.Google Scholar

29 The Arts Council of Great Britain, Eleventh Annual Report of the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1955–6 (London: The Baynard Press, 1956), p. 6.Google Scholar

30 Ibid., p. 11.

33 Landstone, Charles, Off-Stage (London: Elek Books, Ltd., 1953), p. 38.Google Scholar

34 Ibid., p. 51.

35 Williamson, Audrey, Contemporary Theatre 1953–1956 (London: Rockliff Publishing Corporation, 1956), p. 180.Google Scholar

36 Landstone, , op. cit., p. 64.Google Scholar

37 The Manchester Guardian, June 13, 1945, p. 3.

38 The Arts Council of Great Britain, First Annual Report of The Arts Council of Great Britain, 1945–6 (London: The Baynard Press, 1946), p. 20.Google Scholar

39 Ibid., p. 23.

40 Ibid., p. 21.

41 Ibid., pp. 22–23.

42 Ibid., p. 6.

43 Ibid., p. 30.

44 The Arts Council of Great Britain, Second Annual Report of The Arts Council of Great Britain, 1946–7 (London: The Baynard Press, 1947), p. 8.Google Scholar

45 Williams, W. E., Economic and Social Aspects of the Theatre (London: Staples Press, Ltd., 1953), p. 3.Google Scholar

46 Ibid., p. 5.

47 The Arts Council of Great Britain, First Annual Report…, p. 12.Google Scholar

48 The Arts Council of Great Britain, Ninth Annual Report of the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1953–4 (London: The Baynard Press, 1954), p. 40.Google Scholar

49 The Arts Council of Great Britain, Seventeenth Annual Report of the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1961–2 (London: The Baynard Press, 1962), p. 31.Google Scholar

50 The Arts Council of Great Britain, Sixth Annual Report of the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1950–1 (London: The Baynard Press, 1951), p. 25.Google Scholar

51 The Times, July 1, 1958, p. 11.

52 The Arts Council of Great Britain, Sixth Annual Report…, p. 29.Google Scholar

53 Dent, Edward J., A Theatre for Everybody (London: T. V. Boardman and Company, Ltd., 1945), p. 152.Google Scholar

54 The Arts Council of Great Britain, Fourth Annual Report of the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1948–9 (London: The Baynard Press, 1949), p. 20.Google Scholar

55 The Arts Council of Great Britain, Housing the Arts in Great Britain, Part I (London: The Arts Council of Great Britain, 1959), p. 19.Google Scholar

56 The Times, March 12, 1955, p. 8.

57 Herbert, Alan P., “No Fine on Fun” (London: Methuen and Company, Ltd., 1956), p. 27.Google Scholar

58 Ibid., p. 116.

59 Ibid., p. 117.

60 Ibid., p. 118.

61 Landstone, , op. cit., pp. 7778.Google Scholar

62 The Arts Council of Great Britain, Eighteenth Annual Report of the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1962–3, (London: The Baynard Press, 1963), p. 12.Google Scholar

63 Page, D. S., The Law of the Amateur Stage (London: Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons, Ltd., 1929), p. 11.Google Scholar

64 Palmer, John, The Censor and the Theatres (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1912), pp. 217218.Google Scholar

65 Shaw, , op. cit., p. 76.Google Scholar

66 Goodwin, Clive, “A View from the Gods,” Encore (July-August, 1963), 5.Google Scholar

67 The Times, May 14, 1957, p. 4.

68 The Times, March 7, 1958, p. 4.

69 the Times, November 24, 1962, p. 6.

70 The Manchester Guardian, December 6, 1962, p. 2.

71 Page, , op. cit., p. 79.Google Scholar

72 Ibid., pp. 82–83.

73 Granville-Barker, , op. cit., p. 77.Google Scholar

74 Herbert, , op. cit., p. 25.Google Scholar

75 The Times, April 2, 1941, p. 2.

76 The Times, January 23, 1953, p. 7.

77 The Times, January 20, 1953, p. 7.

78 The Times, January 31, 1953, p. 7.

79 Williams, W. E., Economic and Social Aspects of the Theatre (London: Staples Press, Ltd., 1953), p. 26.Google Scholar

80 The Times, January 27, 1956, p. 3.

81 The Times, March 29, 1957, p. 6.

82 The Arts Council of Great Britain, Housing the Arts in Great Britain, Part I, p. 4.Google Scholar

83 Kendall, William, “The City Fathers and the Theatre,” Drama, Autumn, 1962, 37.Google Scholar

84 The Arts Council of Great Britain, Fourteenth Annual Report…, p. 26.Google Scholar

85 The Arts Council of Great Britain, Seventeenth Annual Report…, p. 33.Google Scholar

86 The Times, December 4, 1947, p. 6.

87 The Manchester Guardian, October 13, 1960, p. 5.

88 The Arts Council of Great Britain, Sixth Annual Report…, p. 25.Google Scholar

89 The Times, December 16, 1960, p. 8.

90 The Times, November 12, 1960, p. 7.

91 The Arts Council of Great Britain, Eighth Annual Report of the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1952–3 (London: The Baynard Press, 1953), p. 4.Google Scholar

92 The Arts Council of Great Britain, Eleventh Annual Report…, p. 15.Google Scholar

93 The Times, March 29,1961, p. 4.

94 The Arts Council of Great Britain, Sixteenth Annual Report of the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1960–1 (London: The Baynard Press, 1961), p. 8.Google Scholar

95 The Times, March 18, 1953, p. 6.

96 The Manchester Guardian, June 13, 1956, p. 9.

97 The Times, March 7, 1958, p. 4.

98 The Manchester Guardian, October 29, 1952, p. 2.

99 The Times, March 13, 1957, p. 4.

100 The Times, June 18, 1958, p. 13.

101 The Times, March 21, 1963, p. 7.

102 The Times, March 21, 1963, p. 7.