Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T11:20:34.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shakespeare and Postmodern Production: An Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2009

W. B. Worthen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This issue of Theatre Survey explores the condition of postmodern Shakespeare production, and by implication the situation of classic drama on the horizon of the contemporary stage. Working on this issue has been, for both of its coeditors, a surprising experience. Theatre Survey is a distinguished journal in the field of theatre history and historiography, and with this issue we intended to press the journal's agenda toward the history and theory of contemporary culture, generating a series of articles on radical, revisionist, and alternative ways of putting “the ‘classics’ into play.” Because we understand this enterprise—from the Kathakali King Lear to Robert Wilson's When We Dead Awaken to Heiner Müller's Medeamaterial to Baz Luhrmann's William Shakespeare's Romeo + Juliet—to stand in a strategic relation to modernity, we were calling the issue “Performance: Modern and Postmodern.”

Type
Articles
Information
Theatre Survey , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , May 1998 , pp. 1 - 5
Copyright
Copyright © American Society for Theatre Research 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

FURTHER READING

Auslander, Philip. Presence and Resistance: Postmodernism and Cultural. Politics in Contemporary American Performance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Bennett, Susan. Performing Nostalgia: Shifting Shakespeare and the Contemporary Past. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Bertens, Hans. The Idea of the Postmodern, a history. New York: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
Birringer, Johannes. Theatre, Theory, Postmodernism. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Bristol, Michael. Big-Time Shakespeare. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Bulman, James C., ed. Shakespeare, Theory, and Performance. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Connor, Steven. Postmodernist Culture. An Introduction to Theories of the Contemporary. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
Hawkes, Terence. Meaning by Shakespeare. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Hawkes, Terence. That Shakespeherian Rag: Essays on a Critical Process. London: Methuen, 1986.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda. The Politics of Postmodernism. New York: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Jameson, Frederic. Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Dennis. Looking at Shakespeare: A Visual History of Twentieth-Century Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans. Bennington, Geoff and Marsumi, Brian. Minneapolis: University of Minnesotta, 1984.Google Scholar
Marcus, Leah S.Unediting the Renaissance: Shakespeare, Marlowe, Milton. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Masten, Jeffrey. Textual Intercourse: Collaboration, Authorship, and Sexualities in Renaissance Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Pechter, Edward, ed. Textual and Theatrical Shakespeare: Questions of Evidence. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Roach, Joseph. Cities of the Dead: Circum-Atlantic Performance. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Williams, Gary Jay. Our Moonlight Revels: A Midsummer Night's Dream in the Theatre. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Worthen, W. B.Shakespeare and the Authority of Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar