Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T01:25:17.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theatre Reconstruction: Tentative Steps Toward a Methodology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2009

Alan Woods
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The scholarly work of reconstructing vanished theatres is of crucial importance to theatre history. The playhouse provides the physical plant for the drama; therefore its shape exerts enormous influence upon plays written for it. Its size and accommodations for the audience reflect and may even determine the drama's function within a given society. To ignore the physical setting of a play's first production is an error almost as damning for the theatre historian as the practice of the literary scholar who forgets that plays are not written for examination in classes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Theatre Survey , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , May 1971 , pp. 46 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © American Society for Theatre Research 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Brockett, O.G., “Research in Theatre History,” ETJ, XIX, 2a (06 1967), 267–275Google Scholar.

2 Ibid., p. 270.

3 Adams, John Cranford, The Globe Playhouse: Its Design and Equipment, 2nd ed. (New York, 1961)Google Scholar.

4 Reynolds, George F., On Shakespeare's Stage, ed. Knaub, Richard K. (Boulder, Colorado, 1967).Google Scholar

5 Kitto, H.D.F., Poiesis: Structure and Thought (Berkeley, 1966)Google Scholar.

6 Nicoll, Allardyce, World Drama (New York, n.d.)Google Scholar. Both Nicoll and Adams are victims of changing scholarly tastes; Adams is especially vulnerable due to the current emphasis upon open staging, which provides its own bias when considering the Globe.

7 Jacobus, Marion, “Puppets at the Parisian Fairs, 1649 to 1742,” ETJ, XVIII (05 1966), 110–121Google Scholar.

8 Bieber, Margarete, The History of the Greek and Roman Theatre, 2nd ed. (Princeton, 1961), p. 70Google Scholar.

9 Boswell, Eleanore, The Restoration Court Stage(1660–1702), 2nd ed. (New York, 1965)Google Scholar.

10 Southern, Richard, The Seven Ages of the Theatre (New York, 1961), p. 88Google Scholar.

11 Nicoll, Allardyce, Stuart Masques and the Renaissance Stage (New York, 1938), p. 29Google Scholar.

12 Baur-Heinhold, Margarete, Baroque Theatre, trans. Whittall, Mary (London, 1967).Google Scholar

13 Brockett, Oscar G., History of the Theatre (Boston, 1968), pp. 260–261Google Scholar.

14 Macgowan, Kenneth and Melnitz, William, Golden Ages of the Theater (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1959), p. 102Google Scholar.

15 Schwartz, I.A., The commedia dell'arte and its influence on French comedy in the seventeenth century (New York, 1933), p. 44Google Scholar.

16 Cf. Hauser, Arnold, The Social History of Art (New York, n.d.), III, 82–83Google Scholar, for a discussion of eighteenth-century societal perceptions of musicians. Hauser's emphasis throughout is upon the cultural influences on art.

17 Gropius, Walter, “Introduction,” The Theater of the Bauhaus (Middletown, Connecticut, 1961), pp. 10–14Google Scholar.

18 Schechner, Richard, “Flexible Theatrical Space,” TDR, XII (Spring 1968), 104Google Scholar.

19 Hotson, Leslie, Shakespeare's Wooden O (London, 1959)Google Scholar.

20 Yates, Frances A., Theatre of the World (London, 1969), p. 101Google Scholar.

21 “Booth's Theatre Opens,” New York Herald, 02. 4, 1869, p. 7Google Scholar.

22 Lehman, Walter M., Memories of an Old Actor (San Francisco, 1886), p. 231Google Scholar.

23 Southern, Richard, The Georgian Playhouse (London, 1948)Google Scholar.

24 McNamara, Brooks, The American Playhouse in the Eighteenth Century (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Montilla, Robert B., “The Awnings of Roman Theatres and Amphitheatres,” TS, X (05 1969), 85Google Scholar. Hotson uses similar arguments in rejecting a roof for the Red Bull Playhouse in The Commonwealth and Restoration Stage (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1928), p. 87Google Scholar.

26 Lea, K.M., Italian Popular Comedy (Oxford, 1934), p. 17Google Scholar.

27 Bibiena, Giuseppe Galli, Architectural and Perspective Designs. … (New York, 1964)Google Scholar.

28 Nagler, A.M., A Source Book in Theatrical History (New York, 1959), p. 54Google Scholar.

29 Cennini, Cennino D'Andrea, Il libro dell'arte (The Craftsman's Handbook), trans. Thompson, Daniel V. Jr., (New Haven, 1933), p. 1fGoogle Scholar.

30 Mullin, Donald C., “The Theatre Royal, Bridges Street: A Conjectural Reconstruction,” ETJ, XIX (03 1967), 17–29Google Scholar.

31 Hodges, C. Walter, The Globe Restored: A Study of the Elizabethan Theatre (London, 1953)Google Scholar.

32 Matthews, Brander, “Introduction to the New Art of Writing Plays,” Papers on Playmaking, 2nd ed. (New York, 1957), p. 7Google Scholar.

33 Duckworth, George E., The Nature of Roman Comedy (Princeton, 1952), pp. 80–81Google Scholar.

34 Beare, W., The Roman Stage, 3rd rev. ed. (London, 1964), p. 159Google Scholar.

35 Buck, Charles H. Jr., A Chronology of the Plays of Plautus (Baltimore, 1940), pp. 13ffGoogle Scholar.

36 Chambers, E.K., William Shakespeare: A Study of Facts and Problems (Oxford, 1930), I, 243–274Google Scholar.

37 Honey, William, The Shakespeare Epitaph Deciphered (London, 1969)Google Scholar.

38 Wellesley, K., “The Production Date of Plautus' Captivi,” AJP, LXXVI (1955), 298–305Google Scholar.

39 Podlecki, Anthony J., The Political Background of Aeschylean Tragedy (Ann Arbor, 1966), p. 142Google Scholar.

40 Martin, Lee J., “From Forestage to Proscenium: A Study of Restoration Staging Techniques,” TS, IV (1963), 3–28Google Scholar.

41 Horne, P.R., The Tragedies of Giambattista Cinthio Giraldi (Oxford, 1962), p. 39Google Scholar.

42 Summers, Montague, The Restoration Theatre (New York, 1934), p. 21Google Scholar.

43 Brockett, , “Research in Theatre History,” pp. 269–270Google Scholar.