Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T05:51:35.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Skryabin's Revolving Harmonies, Lacanian Desire, and Riemannian Funktionstheorie

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

Abstract

That Skryabin's harmonic language is rooted in dominant functionality is commonly acknowledged. However, the flow of his tensile dominant-based sonorities has not been adequately explored. This article seeks to correlate his harmonic processes with his erotically charged philosophy. It sketches ways in which our understanding of Skryabin's harmonic ‘flow’ can be reinforced by analytical thinking in both psychoanalysis and music theory, bringing Jacques Lacan's semiotic model of the circuit of human desire into dialogue with Hugo Riemann's Funktionstheorie. Two of Skryabin's harmonic proclivities direct the chosen analytical approach: 1) sequential chains of fifths and 2) transposition by multiples of the minor third. The interchange of these two characteristics is explored, with Riemann's categories of chordal function (T, S, and D) grafted onto a model of tonal pitch space derived (via Fred Lerdahl) from Gottfried Weber. The way in which Skryabin ‘rotates’ tonal functions sequentially (i.e., TSDT) in a potentially infinite cycle of fifths, rerouted occasionally through minor-third transposition, is correlated with Lacanian drive theory. The article's concluding analysis of Skryabin's late octatonic Sonata no. 6, Op. 62, takes this ‘rotation’ of tonal function to a deeper structural level. The labelling system of Funktionstheorie, which is stretched at this point, is reconceptualized through Lacan's extension of his theory of desire into semiotics.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, James M.The Music of Alexander Scriabin. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Belyayev, Viktor. Musorgsky, Skryabin, Stravinsky. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo ‘Muzyka’, 1972.Google Scholar
Bowers, Faubion. The New Scriabin: Enigma and Answers. London: David & Charles, 1974.Google Scholar
Bowers, Faubion. Scriabin: a Biography, 2 vols. New York: Dover Publications, 1996.Google Scholar
Callender, Clifton. ‘Voice-Leading Parsimony in the Music of Alexander Scriabin’. Journal of Music Theory 42/2 (1999), 219–33.Google Scholar
Cheong, Wai-Ling. ‘The Late Scriabin: Pitch Organisation and Form in the Works of 1910–14’. PhD diss., University of Cambridge, 1991.Google Scholar
Cheong, Wai-Ling. ‘Scriabin's Octatonic Sonata’. Journal of the Royal Musical Association 121/2 (1996), 206–28.Google Scholar
Childs, Adrian. ‘Moving Beyond Neo-Riemannian Triads: Exploring a Transformational Model for Seventh Chords’. Journal of Music Theory 42/2 (1998), 181–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Thomas S.Rameau and Musical Thought in the Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Cohn, Richard. ‘Maximally Smooth Cycles, Hexatonic Systems, and the Analysis of Late-Romantic Triadic Progressions’. Music Analysis 15/1 (1996), 940.Google Scholar
Cohn, Richard. ‘As Wonderful as Star Clusters: Instruments for Gazing at Tonality in Schubert’. 19th-Century Music 22/3 (1999), 213–32.Google Scholar
de Schloezer, Boris. Scriabin: Artist and Mystic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Dernova, Varvara. Garmoniya Skryabina. Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo ‘Muzyka’, 1968.Google Scholar
Douthett, Jack, and Steinbach, Peter. ‘Parsimonious Graphs: a Study in Parsimony, Contextual Transformations, and Modes of Limited Transposition’. Journal of Music Theory 42/2 (1998), 241–63.Google Scholar
Fink, Bruce. A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Theory and Technique. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Garcia, Susanna. ‘Alexander Skryabin and Russian Symbolism: Plot and Symbols in the Late Piano Sonatas’. PhD diss., University of Texas at Austin, 1993.Google Scholar
Guenther, Roy J. ‘Varvara Dernova's “Garmoniia Skriabina”: a Translation and Critical Commentary’. PhD diss., Catholic University of America, 1979.Google Scholar
Guenther, Roy J.. ‘Varvara Dernova's System of Analysis of the Music of Skryabin’, in Russian Theoretical Thought in Music, ed. McQuere, Gordon D.. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI, 1983. 165216.Google Scholar
Harrison, Daniel. Harmonic Function in Chromatic Music: a Renewed Dualist Theory and an Account of Its Precedents. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Krumhansl, Carol. ‘Perceived Triad Distance: Evidence Supporting the Psychological Reality of Neo-Riemannian Transformations’. Journal of Music Theory 42/2 (1998), 265–81.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, ed. Miller, Jacques-Alain, trans. Sheridan, Alan. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan 11. New York and London: W. W. Norton, 1998.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: a Selection. London: Tavistock, 2004.Google Scholar
Lendvai, Ernő, Symmetries of Music: an Introduction to the Semantics of Music. Kecskemét: Kodály Institute, 1993.Google Scholar
Lerdahl, Fred. Tonal Pitch Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Perle, George. ‘Scriabin's Self Analyses’. Music Analysis 3/2 (1984), 101–22.Google Scholar
Reise, Jay. ‘Late Skriabin: Some Principles Behind the Style’. 19th-Century Music 6/3 (1983), 220–31.Google Scholar
Riemann, Hugo. Harmony Simplified (or the Theory of the Tonal Functions of Chords). London: Augener, 1895.Google Scholar
Sabaneyev, Leonid. Vospominaniya o Skryabine (1925). Moscow: Classica XXI, 2003.Google Scholar
Sabbagh, Peter. The Development of Harmony in Scriabin's Works. USA: Universal Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar
Samson, Jim. ‘Reviewed Work: The Workshop of Bartók and Kodály by Ernő Lendvai; Bartók by Paul Griffiths’. Tempo 151 (1984), 3941.Google Scholar
Smith, Kenneth. ‘“A Science of Tonal Love”? Drive and Desire in Twentieth-Century Harmony: the Erotics of Alexander Skryabin’. Music Analysis 29/1–3 (2010), 243–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarasti, Eero. Myth and Music: a Semiotic Approach to the Aesthetics of Myth in Music, Especially That of Wagner, Sibelius and Stravinsky. The Hague: Mouton, 1979.Google Scholar
Taruskin, Richard. ‘Chernomor to Kashchei: Harmonic Sorcery; or, Stravinsky's “Angle”’. Journal of the American Musicological Society 38/1 (1985), 72142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taruskin, Richard. ‘Scriabin and the Superhuman: a Millennial Essay’, in Defining Russia Musically. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997. 308–59.Google Scholar
Willmann, Roland. ‘Alexander Skrjabin: die 6. Klaviersonate Op. 62’. Die Musikforschung 48/2 (1995), 153–66.Google Scholar