Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T01:38:42.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Nottingham Arboretum (1852): natural history, leisure and public culture in a Victorian regional centre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2008

PAUL ELLIOTT
Affiliation:
School of Humanities, University of Derby, Kedleston Rd, Derby, DE22 1GB
STEPHEN DANIELS
Affiliation:
School of Geography, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD
CHARLES WATKINS
Affiliation:
School of Geography, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD

Abstract:

This article examines the development of the Nottingham Arboretum (1852), the centrepiece of one of the most ambitious schemes of urban enclosure and improvement in mid-Victorian Britain. It contends that the provision for parks and green spaces in the town was inspired by local naturalists and sanitary reformers as well as cultural emulation and civic rivalry with other urban centres such as Derby and Manchester. Analysis of the design and management of the Arboretum and green spaces and local controversies about funding and access reveal major local disagreements concerning uses of such spaces reflecting continued divisions in Victorian urban society beneath the public rhetorical and celebratory façade.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Chadwick, G.F., The Park and the Town (London, 1966)Google Scholar; Conway, Hazel, People's Parks: The Design and Development of Victorian Parks in Britain (Cambridge, 1991)Google Scholar; Elliott, B., Victorian Gardens (London, 1990)Google Scholar; Taylor, H.A., ‘Urban public parks, 1840–1900: design and meaning’, Garden History, 23 (1995), 201–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clark, P. (ed.), The European City and Green Space: London, Stockholm, Helsinki and St. Petersburg, 1850–2000 (Aldershot, 2006)Google Scholar.

2 There are interesting parallels here such as the disagreements amongst American Victorian park promoters concerning which rational recreational, sporting, religious and other activities should be encouraged in urban parks, Cranz, G., The Politics of Park Design: A History of Urban Parks in America (Cambridge, MA, 1982), 1424Google Scholar; Rosenzweig, R. and Blackmar, E., The Park and the People: A History of Central Park (New York, 1992), 238–59Google Scholar.

3 Bailey, T., Annals of Nottinghamshire, 4 vols. (London, 1855)Google Scholar, vol. IV; Church, R., Economic and Social Change in a Midland Town: Victorian Nottingham, 1815–1900 (London, 1966)Google Scholar; Thomis, M., Politics and Society in Nottingham, 1785–1835 (Oxford, 1969)Google Scholar; Beckett, J., East Midlands (London 1988), 189298Google Scholar; Beckett, J. et al. , A Centenary History of Nottingham (Manchester, 1997)Google Scholar.

4 Wylie, T., Old and New Nottingham (Nottingham, 1851), 33, 331Google Scholar; Thomis, M., Old Nottingham (Newton Abbot, 1968), 5268Google Scholar; Thomis, Politics and Society, 122–6.

5 Sutton, J.F., The Date Book of Remarkable and Memorable Events Connected with Nottingham, vol. II (Nottingham, 1880), 362–3, 563–4Google Scholar; Bailey, Annals, vol. II, 338–9.

6 Gray, D. and Walker, V.W. (eds.), Records of the Borough of Nottingham, 9 vols. (Nottingham, 1956)Google Scholar, vol. IX, reports of the sanitary committees, 13 Dec. 1847, 26 Jun., 1 Oct. 1849, 56–9, 67–77.

7 Nottingham Review, 14 May 1852; Gray and Walker (eds.), Records, vol. IX, report of the sanitary committee, 1 Oct. 1849, 71; Thomis, Old Nottingham; Thomis, M., ‘The politics of Nottingham enclosure’, Transactions of the Thoroton Society of Nottinghamshire, 71 (1968), 90–6Google Scholar; Beckett et al., Centenary History, 204–15; Biagini, E., ‘The complex pattern of opposition to the Nottingham enclosure’, East Midland Geographer, 19 (1996), 2037Google Scholar.

8 Millhouse, R., Sherwood Forest, and Other Poems (London, 1827)Google Scholar; Brisco, J.P. (ed.), The Sonnets and Songs of Robert Millhouse . . . with a Biographical Sketch of the Author (London, 1881)Google Scholar; Hall, S., Biographical Sketches of Remarkable People (London, 1873), 302–7Google Scholar; Wylie, Nottingham, 207–10; M. Howitt, An Autobiography, ed. M. Howitt, 2 vols. (Boston, MA, and New York, 1889), vol. I, 183, 222–4, 234–5; Nottingham Review, 20 Jan., 3 Feb. 1853.

9 Hall, Biographical Sketches, 311; S. Hall, The Forester's Offering (London, 1841), 82–3; Howitt, W., Book of the Seasons (London, 1831)Google Scholar; Howitt, G., Nottinghamshire Flora (London, 1839)Google Scholar; on the role of natural history in the popularization of Victorian science: Allen, D.E., The Naturalist in Britain: A Social History (London, 1976)Google Scholar; Barber, L., The Heyday of Natural History: 1820–1870 (New York, 1980)Google Scholar; Merrill, L.L., The Romance of Victorian Natural History (Oxford, 1989)Google Scholar; Lightman, B. (ed.), Victorian Science in Context (Chicago, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, especially B.T. Gates, ‘Ordering nature: revisioning Victorian science culture’, 179–86, B. Lightman, ‘The voices of nature: popularizing Victorian science’, 187–211, and A.B. Shteir, ‘Elegant recreations? Configuring science writing for women’, 236–55.

10 Howitt, Book of the Seasons, xiv–xv; Howitt, Autobiography, vol. I, 237.

11 Gray and Walker (eds.), Records, vol. IX, 3–6, 202–4; Howitt, Book of the Seasons, xx–xxi, xxiii.

12 Gray and Walker (eds.), Records, vol. IX, 2; Church, Victorian Nottingham, 128–92; Beckett, East Midlands, 244–53.

13 Church, Victorian Nottingham, 108–11; Nottingham Journal, 1, 11 Aug. 1845; P. Elliott, ‘The Derby Arboretum (1840): the first specially designed municipal public park in Britain’, Midland History, 26, (2001), 144–76; H. Conway, Public Parks (Princes Risborough, 1996), 15.

14 S.D. Chapman, ‘The life and work of William Felkin’, Nottingham University, MA diss., 1960; Church, Victorian Nottingham, 76, 154, 370, 185–7, 314; Nottingham Review, 20 Oct. 1846; R. Mellors, Men of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire (Nottingham, 1924), 173–4, 230.

15 Glover, S., The History and Directory of the Town of Nottingham (Nottingham, 1844), 112–13Google Scholar; Wardle, D., Education and Society in Nineteenth-Century Nottingham (London, 1971), 137–8Google Scholar, 177–82; Church, Victorian Nottingham, 35–7, 131–3, 154, 194, 170–3, 371; Nottingham Journal, 6, 20 Oct. 1837; Catalogue of the Exhibition, Nottingham, 1840 (Nottingham, 1840), 13–21; Ordoyno, T., Flora Nottinghamiensis (Newark, 1807)Google Scholar; Jacks, L., The Great Houses of Nottinghamshire and the County Families (Nottingham, 1881)Google Scholar; Mellors, Men of Nottingham, 199; records of the Nottingham Mechanics' Institution, Nottinghamshire County Record Office (henceforth NCRO), acc. 6318.

16 Minutes of the enclosure committee, 26 Oct., 22, 25 Nov. 1853, NCRO, CA/CM 60/1.

17 Ibid.; according to Wylie in 1853 the passing of the bill ‘marked the dawn of a new era in the history of the town’, the ‘green fields now being transformed into open and airy streets’, Gray and Walker (eds.), Records, vol. IX, 51–2, 85; Nottingham Journal, 7 Aug. 1846; Wylie, Nottingham, 33.

18 Reports of the enclosure committee, 20 Feb. 1845, 21 Oct. 1847, in Gray and Walker (eds.), Records, vol. IX, 42–4, 55; report of the enclosure commissioners, 3 Feb. 1846, in Gray and Walker (eds.), Records, vol. IX, 50.

19 Nottingham Journal, 8 Aug. 1851, 14 May 1852; Nottingham Review, 14 May 1852.

20 Nottingham Journal and Nottingham Review, 14 May 1852.

21 Illustrated London News, 15 May 1852; Nottingham Review, 14 May 1852; Nottingham Journal, 12 Dec. 1851, 2, 16, 20 Jan. 1852.

22 Nottingham Journal, 14 May 1852.

23 Nottingham Journal, 9 May, 27 Jun., 7 Nov. 1851; Beckett, J. and Brand, K., ‘Enclosure and the rise of the new Nottingham, 1845–67’, Transactions of the Thoroton Society, 98, (1996), 92111Google Scholar.

24 Minutes of the enclosure committee, 20 Aug., 11, 26, 28 Sep. 1850, NCRO, CA/CM 60/1.

25 Nottingham Journal, 4 Oct. 1850, 21 Feb. 1851.

26 Curtis, S., A Monograph on the Genus Camellia (London, 1819)Google Scholar; Curtis, S., Beauties of Flora (Gamston, 1820)Google Scholar; Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society, 1933.

27 Report of the enclosure committee, 30 Sep. 1850, in Gray and Walker (eds.), Records, vol. IX, 82; Nottingham Journal, 4 Oct. 1850, 17 Jan. 1851.

28 Minutes of the enclosure committee, 7, 14 Oct. 1850, 27 Jul. 1853, NCRO, CA/CM 60/1; Gray and Walker (eds.), Records, vol. IX, 28 Nov. 1853, 100; White, F., History and Directory of Nottingham (Sheffield, 1864), 33–5Google Scholar; Mellors, R., The Gardens, Parks and Walks of Nottingham and District (Nottingham, 1926), 4653Google Scholar; Illiffe, R. and Baguley, W., Victorian Nottingham: A Story in Pictures, 20 vols. (Nottingham, 1973), vol. X, 3149Google Scholar; Elliott, ‘Derby Arboretum’.

29 Nottingham Review, 14 May 1852; Elliott, ‘Derby Arboretum’, 155–60.

30 Nottingham Journal, 17 Jan. 1851.

31 Nottingham Journal, 13 Feb. 1852.

32 Nottingham Journal, 18 Aug. 1843, 19 Jul. 1844, 2 Aug. 1844, 1 Aug. 1845, 31 Aug. 1846, 16 Jun. 1848, 5 Jul. 1850, 13 Feb. 1852.

33 Report of the general enclosure committee, 4 Aug. 1846, in Gray and Walker (eds.), Records, vol. IX, 51; Paxton, J., ‘Remarks on arboretums’, Magazine of Botany, 8 (1841), 40–1Google Scholar; Nottingham Journal, 14 May 1852; Nottingham Review, 14 May 1852; Illustrated London News, 15 May 1852.

34 Nottingham Journal, 19 Mar. 1852; Elliott, ‘Derby Arboretum’, 162–4.

35 Nottingham Journal, 1, 15 Feb., 14 Jun., 2, 9, 16, 23 Aug., 1850, 7 Feb. 1851, 30 Jan. 1852.

36 Nottingham Review, 14 May 1852.

37 Nottingham Journal, 2 Jan. 1852, 26 Apr., 4 Oct. 1850, 17 Jan. 1851, 1 May 1852.

38 Regulations for the Nottingham Arboretum, 15 Mar. 1852, in Gray and Walker (eds.), Records, vol. IX, 89.

39 Nottingham Journal, 13, 20 Feb., 19, 26 Mar., 1, 2, 30 Apr., 1, 8 May 1852.

40 Gray and Walker (eds.), Records, vol. XI, 28 Apr., 28 May, 8, 30 Jun., 7 Sep. 1857, 120, 121, 124–5; Nottingham Review, 1 May 1857; Nottingham Journal, 1, 8 May 1857.

41 Nottingham Journal, 14 May 1852.

42 Gray and Walker (eds.), Records, vol. XI, 14 Jul. 1852, 17 Aug. 1853, 14 Aug. 1856, 29 Jun. 1855, 4 Jun. 1860; Nottingham Journal, 1 May 1857; Church, Victorian Nottingham, 155–7; Gray and Walker (eds.), Records, vol. IX, 21 Mar., 9 May 1859, 135–6.

43 Gray and Walker (eds.), Records, vol. XI, 7 May, 4 Jun. 1858, 4 Feb., 21 Jul., 8, 15 Aug. 1859.

44 Memorial submitted by enclosure committee, 27 Sep. 1852, council minutes, 11 Oct. 1852; council minutes, 9 Apr. 1857; enclosure committee minutes 15 Dec. 1857, 18 Mar., 1, 23, 27 Apr., 4 Jun. 1858, NCRO, CA/CM 60/1; Gray and Walker (eds.), Records, vol. IX, 27 Sep. 1852, 16 Mar. 1857, 10 May 1858, 4 Aug. 1862, 4 Feb. 1889, 31 Aug. 1891, 94, 119–20, 131, 158, 337, 354; Nottingham Journal, 1 Oct. 1852.

45 Houghton, W.E., The Victorian Frame of Mind (New Haven, 1957), 8495Google Scholar; Nottingham Review, 14 May 1852, 22 Aug., 7 Nov. 1851.