Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T17:41:28.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE CONFESSIONAL UNMASKED: RELIGIOUS MERCHANDISE AND OBSCENITY IN VICTORIAN ENGLAND

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2013

Dominic Janes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On 19 May 1868 the Conservative MP Percy Wyndham rose in the House of Commons to ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department “whether he is aware that Publications, the sale of which has been condemned by a Court of Law, are now being openly offered for sale in the Streets of London, and such being the case, whether the Police have power to interfere?” Gathorne Hardy replied that

Sir, I have made inquiries into the subject of my hon. Friend's Question, and I find that since the decision referred to that book has not been sold in the streets, though there is no doubt – for I hold one of the covers in my hand – that the cover is put on books in order to sell them, but within the cover the purchaser finds a book of a totally different character, and of a harmless nature. The attraction of the title appears to be great, as it is used for advertising and selling books of a very different kind. I am told that the Police keep a register of the books and pamphlets sold in the streets, and interfere when their interference is called for. As to the book referred to by my hon. Friend – for I presume his Question relates to The Confessional Unmasked – I find on inquiry at the depôt from which it was issued that all the remaining copies have been destroyed, and that there are none now for sale. (Hansard)

The legal regulation of pornography in England from the later nineteenth century relied on a definition of obscenity derived from a case concerning a religious tract, The Confessional Unmasked (1836) (McDonald). This pamphlet had been circulating for many years before it came to the notice of the courts. Henry Scott, a metal broker from Wolverhampton, had reprinted the text and circulated it on behalf of the Protestant Evangelical Union. The case went on appeal from the local magistrates, one of whom was Benjamin Hicklin, to the Court of Queen's Bench, where judgment was given on 29 April 1868 (“A Judgment” and Scott). This seems, on the face of it, bizarre. Indeed, that this case was brought at all has been seen as highlighting the problematic nature of the Obscene Publications Act (1857) under which the action was brought (Roberts 627). However, it can be argued that the danger that the act was defined to prevent had much more to do with the publication of religious tracts than might appear to have been the case.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 677 - 690
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Achilli v. Newman: A Full and Authentic Report of the Above Prosecution for Libel, Tried before Lord Campbell and a Special Jury, in the Court of Queen's Bench, Westminster, June, 1852. London: W. Strange, 1852.Google Scholar
Altick, Richard A. “English Publishing and the Mass Audience in 1852.” Studies in Bibliography 6 (1954): 3–24.Google Scholar
Anson, Peter F.The Call of the Cloister: Religious Communities and Kindred Bodies in the Anglican Communion. Revised and ed. Campbell, A. W.. London: S. P. C. K., 1964.Google Scholar
Arnstein, Walter L. “The Murphy Riots: A Victorian Dilemma.” Victorian Studies 19.1 (1975): 51–71.Google Scholar
Bartrip, Peter. “A ‘Pennurth of Arsenic for Rat Poison’: The Arsenic Act, 1851 and the Prevention of Secret Poisoning.” Medical History 36 (1992): 53–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, A. W. “‘Indecent and Demoralising Representations’: Public Anatomy Museums in Mid-Victorian England.” Medical History 52 (2008): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, Anne. “Some Aspects of the History of Anti-Pollution Legislation in England, 1819–1954.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 14 (1959): 475–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brantlinger, Patrick. “The Case of the Poisonous Book: Mass Literacy as Threat in Nineteenth-Century British Fiction.” Victorian Review 20.2 (1994): 117–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“C. B.” The Confessional Unmasked: Showing the Depravity of the Priesthood . . . being Extracts from the Theological Works of Saint Alphonso M. de Liguori, Peter Dens [and others]. London: Protestant Electoral Union, 1866.Google Scholar
Cocks, H. G.Nameless Offences: Homosexual Desire in the Nineteenth Century. London: I. B. Tauris, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colligan, Colette. The Traffic in Obscenity from Byron to Beardsley: Sexuality and Exoticism in Nineteenth-Century Print Culture. London: Palgrave, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Court of Queen's Bench on the ‘Confessional Unmasked.’” Pall Mall Gazette 1 May 1868.Google Scholar
Douglas-Fairhurst, Robert. Victorian Afterlives: The Shaping of Influence in Nineteenth-Century Literature. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, Robert H. The Victorian Pulpit: Spoken and Written Sermons in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Selinsgrove: Susquehanna UP, 1998.Google Scholar
“Fairplay.” Letter to the Honorable and Reverend F. Baring, with Reference to the Statements [on the use of the confessional by the Rev. Alfred Poole] Reported to have been Made by him, at St. James Hall, on Friday, the 11th of June, 1858. London: np, 1858.Google Scholar
Frederickson, Kathleen. “Victorian Pornography and the Laws of Genre.” Literature Compass 8.5 (2011): 304–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansard. Vol. 192 c512. Millbank Systems. Web. 20 Mar. 2012.Google Scholar
Heath, Diana. Purifying Empire: Obscenity and the Politics of Moral Regulation in Britain, India and Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. The Paranoid Style in American Politics. New York: Knopf, 1965.Google Scholar
“Incense-ibility.” Punch 29 Dec. 1866: 259.Google Scholar
Janes, Dominic. “The Rites of Man: The British Museum and the Sexual Imagination in Victorian Britain.” Journal of the History of Collections 20.1 (2008): 101–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janes, Dominic. “Sex and Text: The Afterlife of Medieval Penance in Britain and Ireland.” Medieval Sexuality: A Casebook. Ed. Harper, April and Proctor, Caroline. New York: Routledge, 2007. 32–44.Google Scholar
Janes, Dominic. Victorian Reformation: The Fight over Idolatry in the Church of England, 1840–60. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janes, Dominic. “Vile Bodies: Victorian Protestants in the Roman Catacombs.” Rome, Pollution and Propriety: Dirt, Disease and Hygiene in the Eternal City from Antiquity to Modernity. Ed. Bradley, Mark. British School in Rome Monograph Series. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2012. 223–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“A Judgment Pronounced on Wednesday by the Court of Queen's Bench.” Morning Post 2 May 1868: 4.Google Scholar
Klaus, Robert J. The Pope, the Protestants, and the Irish: Papal Aggression and Anti-Catholicism in Mid-Nineteenth-Century England. New York: Garland, 1987.Google Scholar
“Lectures on Roman Catholicism.” Huddersfield Chronicle and West Yorkshire Advertiser 27 June 1868: 8.Google Scholar
“The Legality of the Confessional Unmasked.” Pall Mall Gazette 13 July 1867: 10.Google Scholar
Liddell, Robert. A Letter to the Lord Bishop of London, on Confession and Absolution, with Special Reference to the Case of the Rev. Alfred Poole, with an Appendix Containing Mr. Poole's Appeal to his Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury. London: J. T. Hayes, 1858.Google Scholar
Lunn, Arnold. The Harrovians. London: Methuen, 1913.Google Scholar
Machin, G. I. T. “The Last Victorian Anti-Ritualist Campaign, 1895–1906,” Victorian Studies 25.3 (1982): 277–302.Google Scholar
Manchester, Colin. “Lord Campbell's Act: England's First Obscenity Statute.” The Journal of Legal History 9.2 (1988): 223–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Samantha. Poetical Remains: Poets’ Graves, Bodies, and Books in the Nineteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Peter D. “Old Phrases and Great Obscenities: The Strange Afterlife of Two Victorian Anxieties.” Journal of Victorian Culture 13.2 (2008): 294–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merryweather, Frederick Somner. Glimmerings in the Dark; or, Lights and Shadows of the Olden Time. London: Simpkin, Marshall, 1850.Google Scholar
Monk, Maria. Awful Disclosures of Maria Monk, as Exhibited in a Narrative of her Sufferings during a Residence of Five Years as a Novice, and Two Years as a Black Nun, in the Hotel Dieu Nunnery at Montreal. London: Richard Groombridge, 1836.Google Scholar
Moran, Leslie J. The Homosexual(ity) of Law. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Mort, Frank. Dangerous Sexualities: Medico-Moral Politics in England since 1830. London: Routledge, 1987.Google Scholar
Nead, Lynda. Victorian Babylon: People, Streets, and Images in Nineteenth-Century London. New Haven: Yale UP, 2000.Google Scholar
“Obscene.” Oxford English Dictionary. 3rd ed. 2004. Web. 25 April 2012.Google Scholar
Paz, D. G.Popular Anti-Catholicism in Mid-Victorian England. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1992.Google Scholar
Pease, Allison. Modernism, Mass Culture and the Aesthetics of Obscenity. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000.Google Scholar
“Pen-Poison.” Hours at Home 6.4 (1868): 289–96.Google Scholar
Popple, Simon. “Photography, Vice and the Moral Dilemma in Victorian Britain,” Early Popular Visual Culture 3.2 (2005): 113–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Priest in Absolution: A Manual for such as are Called unto the Higher Ministries in the English Church. London: J. Masters, 1866.Google Scholar
Regina v. Hicklin, 1868. Law Reports 3 Queen's Bench 360. Wikisource.org. Web. 25 Feb. 2013.Google Scholar
“Religion before the Reformation: Chapter VII.” Teacher's Offering (Sept. 1857): 228–32.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. J. D. “Morals, Art, and the Law: The Passing of the Obscene Publications Act, 1857.” Victorian Studies 28.4 (1985): 609–29.Google Scholar
Sargent, George Etell. Sketches of the Crusades. London: Partridge and Oakey, 1849.Google Scholar
Scott, Henry. The Seizure of “The Confessional” by the Magistrates, and the Vindication of Civil and Religious Liberty by the Ratepayers of Wolverhampton. London: Protestant Evangelical Mission, 1867.Google Scholar
Searle, G. R.Morality and the Market in Victorian Britain. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seymour, Michael Hobart. Mornings among the Jesuits at Rome. 3rd “considerably enlarged” ed. London: Seeley, 1850.Google Scholar
Sigel, Lisa. Governing Pleasures: Pornography and Social Change in England, 1815–1914. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 2002.Google Scholar
Walkowitz, Judith R. City of Dreadful Delight: Narratives of Sexual Danger in Late-Victorian London. London: Virago, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, Frank H. “Anti-Catholicism in Mid-Victorian Britain: Theory and Discipline.” Journal of Religion and Society 7 (2005): 1–17.Google Scholar
Walsh, Walter. The Secret History of the Oxford Movement. London: Swann Sonnenschein, 1897.Google Scholar
Walsh, Walter. The Secret Work of the Ritualists, Being the Substance of a Lecture Delivered in Edinburgh under the Auspices of the Protestant Truth Society on 16th March 1894. London: Shaw, 1894.Google Scholar
Waters, Catherine. “‘Trading in Death’: Contested Commodities in Household Words.” Victorian Periodicals Review 36.4 (2003): 313–30.Google Scholar
Wolffe, John. The Protestant Crusade in Great Britain, 1829–1860. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, Nigel. Anglican Ritualism in Victorian Britain, 1830–1910. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1999.Google Scholar