No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Extract
One salutary effect of encountering the often bizarre materials—Leibniz's possible worlds theory, war-games played in Prussian military academies, books about the presidency of Jefferson Davis—that Catherine Gallagher has assembled in Telling It Like It Wasn't is that one obtains a better purchase on the deep weirdness that also informs normal realist novels. That weirdness is central to the realist tradition's historical fictions especially, by virtue of the peculiar manner in which they compound together fictional invention and referentiality and call on readers to traverse the ontological chasms between the two.
- Type
- Roundtable: Telling It Like It Wasn't, by Catherine Gallagher
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018
References
Works Cited
Dannenberg, Hilary P. Coincidence and Counterfactuality: Plotting Time and Space in Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Duncan, Ian. Scott's Shadow: The Novel in Romantic Edinburgh. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Freedgood, Elaine. “Fictional Settlements: Footnotes, Metalepsis, the Colonial Effect.” New Literary History 41, no. 2 (Spring 2010): 393–411.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. Telling It Like It Wasn't: The Counterfactual Imagination in History and Fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Hershinow, Stephanie Insley. “When Experience Matters: Tom Jones and ‘Virtue Rewarded.’” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 47, no. 3 (2014): 363–82.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Richard. The Historical Novel in Europe, 1650–1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Scott, Sir Walter. Redgauntlet (1824). Edited by Sutherland, Kathryn. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar