Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T03:11:20.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Particular Webs: Middlemarch, Typologies, and Digital Studies of Women's Lives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2018

Alison Booth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

[H]e was enamoured of that arduous invention which is the very eye of research, provisionally framing its object and correcting it to more and more exactness of relation … to pierce the obscurity of those minute processes.

—George Eliot, Middlemarch

It would be hard to discover a theoretical or aesthetic approach to George Eliot's Middlemarch that is not already anticipated in some way by the novel's sagacious narrator. Possibly that persona, the quintessential Victorian polymath, does not foresee digital humanities as we know it. But critics have been struck as much by Eliot's prototyping of information systems, semiotics, and network analysis as by her humanist ethics. Casaubon does not invent the database of myths any more than Lydgate discovers DNA, or than Marian Evans Lewes rivals Ada Lovelace and Charles Babbage. As I illustrate a kind of digital research that adjusts to the minute particulars of narrative, I hope to keep sight of historical distances between the 1830s, the 1870s, and the era of feminist Victorian studies that I sketch here. Lydgate's penetrative “invention,” in the epigraph, is associated elsewhere in the novel with his actual “flesh-and-blood” vitality: “He cared not only for ‘cases,’ but for John and Elizabeth, especially Elizabeth” (Middlemarch, chap. 15). He is as dedicated to evidence as the narrator, in many scientific analogies, counsels readers to be, and yet he approaches his own life story and the characters of women with a kind of prejudgment that filters out most data. Eliot's readers, seeing Lydgate's errors, are flattered into believing we miss no signals and see all analogies. Can contemporary readers appreciate both numerical cases and individual stories of women? In this article I try to outline a feminist criticism that encompasses both typological classifications and flesh-and-blood individuality, both digital research and interpretative advocacy.

Type
Essay Cluster: The Futures of Feminist Criticism
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , Spring 2019 , pp. 5 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

My thanks go to Talia Schaffer for insightful help in revising this essay.

References

Works Cited

Allison, Sarah. “Discerning Syntax: George Eliot's Relative Clauses.” ELH 81, no. 4 (2014): 1275–97.Google Scholar
Arnold, Jean. “Quitting Middlemarch.” George Eliot-George Henry Lewes Studies 68 (2016): 136–47.Google Scholar
Arrieta-Kenna, Ruairi. “Recently Retired Professor Accused of Sexual Assault.” Stanford Politics, November 9, 2017. https://stanfordpolitics.org/2017/11/09/moretti-rape-accusation-with-updates/.Google Scholar
Beaty, Jerome. Middlemarch, From Notebook to Novel: A Study of George Eliot's Creative Method. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Best, Stephen, and Marcus, Sharon. “Surface Reading: An Introduction.” Representations 108, no. 1 (Fall 2009): 1–21.Google Scholar
Birch, Dinah. “The Scholar Husband.” Essays in Criticism 54, no. 3 (2004): 205–15.Google Scholar
Bode, Katherine. “The Equivalence of ‘Close’ and ‘Distant’ Reading: or, Toward a New Object for Data-Rich Literary History.” Modern Language Quarterly 78, no. 1 (2017): 77–106.Google Scholar
Booth, Alison. “Feminism.” Victorian Literature and Culture 46, nos. 3–4 (2018): 691–97.Google Scholar
Booth, Alison. Greatness Engendered: George Eliot and Virginia Woolf. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Booth, Alison. How to Make It as a Woman: Collective Biographical History from Victoria to the Present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Booth, Alison. “Little Dorrit and Dorothea Brooke: Interpreting the Heroines of History.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 41 (1986): 190–216.Google Scholar
Brilmyer, S. Pearl. “Plasticity, Form, and the Matter of Character in Middlemarch.” Representations 130, no. 1 (2015): 60–83.Google Scholar
Broyard, Anatole. “Books of the Times; Revising the Heroine.” New York Times, September 11, 1982. http://www.nytimes.com/1982/09/11/books/books-of-the-times-revising-the-heroine.html.Google Scholar
Clinton, Chelsea. She Persisted. Illus. Boiger, Alexandra. New York: Penguin/Random House, 2017.Google Scholar
Clinton, Chelsea. She Persisted Around the World. Illus. Boiger, Alexandra. New York: Penguin/Random House, 2018.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, Rachel Blau. Writing Beyond the Ending: Narrative Strategies in Twentieth-Century Women Writers. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Drucker, Johanna. “Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display.” DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly 5, no. 1 (2011). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/1/000091/000091.html#.Google Scholar
Elliott, Dorice Williams. The Angel out of the House: Philanthropy and Gender in Nineteenth-Century England. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Fessenbecker, Patrick. “In Defense of Paraphrase.” New Literary History 44, no. 1 (2013): 117–39.Google Scholar
Fraser, Hilary. “St. Theresa, St. Dorothea, and Miss Brooke in Middlemarch.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 40, no. 4 (1986): 400–411.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. “George Eliot, Immanent Victorian.” Representations 91, no. 5 (2005): 61–74.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Sandra M., and Gubar, Susan. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Grégoire, Pierre Marie. Maidens of Hallowed Names. Woodstock: College of the Sacred Heart, 1881.Google Scholar
Haight, Gordon. George Eliot. New York: Oxford University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Marianne. “Feminist Archives of Possibility.” differences 29, no. 1 (2018): 173–88. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-6681696.Google Scholar
Hughes, Kathryn. Victorians Undone: Tales of the Flesh in the Age of Decorum. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Audrey. The Affective Life of the Average Man: The Victorian Novel and the Stock-Market Graph. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Judge, Jennifer. “The Gendering of Habit in George Eliot's Middlemarch.” Victorian Review 39, no. 1 (2014): 158–81.Google Scholar
Klein, Lauren. “Distant Reading After Moretti,” posted January 10, 2018. http://lklein.com/2018/01/distant-reading-after-moretti/.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, Margaret. Sister Dora: A Biography. Boston: Roberts, 1880.Google Scholar
Losh, Elizabeth, and Wernimont, Jacqueline, eds. Bodies of Information: Intersectional Feminism and Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Main, Alexander. Wise, Witty, and Tender Sayings of George Eliot. Edinburgh: Blackwood, 1872.Google Scholar
Manton, Jo. Sister Dora: The Life of Dorothy Pattison. London: Methuen, 1971.Google Scholar
Marshall, Megan. “On Margaret Fuller and Woman in the Twenty-First Century.” New Yorker, November 15, 2016. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/on-margaret-fuller-and-woman-in-the-twenty-first-century.Google Scholar
Miller, Nancy K. But Enough About Me. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Oldfield, Sybil. “George Eliot's Dorothea? ‘That Fair Bright Useful Woman’: Mrs. Nassau Senior in George Eliot's Life and Writing.” George Eliot Fellowship 40 (2009): 7–17.Google Scholar
Palmer, Alan. “Social Minds in Fiction and Criticism.” Style 45, no. 2 (2011): 196–240.Google Scholar
Purdy, Dwight H. “‘The One Poor Word’ in Middlemarch.” SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500–1900 44, no. 4 (2004): 805–21.Google Scholar
Reeve, Jonathan, et al. “Computational Analyses of the Critical History of George Eliot's Middlemarch.” Middlemarch Critical Histories Project, February 26, 2017. https://github.com/lit-mod-viz/middlemarch-critical-histories.Google Scholar
Reeve, Jonathan. Terlunen, Milan, and Eckert, Sierra. “Frequently Cited Passages Across Time: New Methods for Studying the Critical Reception of Texts.” ADHO, DH 2017 Conference Abstracts, 781–83. https://dh2017.adho.org/abstracts/DH2017-abstracts.pdf.Google Scholar
Rhody, Lisa Marie. “Beyond Darwinian Distance: Situating Distant Reading in a Feminist Ut Pictura Poesis Tradition.” PMLA 3, no. 3 (2017): 659.Google Scholar
Ridsdale, Ellen. Sister Dora: Personal Reminiscence of her Later Years, with some of her Letters. Walsall: Griffin, 1880.Google Scholar
Shore, Daniel. Cyberformalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Showalter, Elaine. A Literature of Their Own. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Simcox, Edith. “Ideals of Feminine Usefulness.” Fortnightly Review, May 1, 1880, 656–71.Google Scholar
Spacks, Patricia Meyer. “The Power of Middlemarch.” Daedalus 143, no. 1 (2014): 64–76.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Juliet, narrator. Middlemarch by Eliot, George. Naxos Audio Books, 2011.Google Scholar
Welsh, Alexander. George Eliot and Blackmail. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. “George Eliot.” Times Literary Supplement, November 20, 1919.Google Scholar