Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T19:49:01.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

REVISING THE POPISH PLOT: FRANCES TROLLOPE'S THE ABBESS AND FATHER EUSTACE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2003

Susan M. Griffin
Affiliation:
University of Louisville

Extract

MY SUBJECT is doubly suspect: polemical religious fiction by Frances Trollope. Victorian Studies has, of course, always stressed the centrality of religion to nineteenth-century culture. Yet, paging through Robert Lee Wolff's magisterial 1977 Gains and Losses: Novels of Faith and Doubt in Victorian England, what is striking is how little advantage has been taken of his work, how few of the fictions he describes have made their way into critical conversation about the Victorian novel. In 1989 John Sutherland mapped what he called the unexplored “lost continent” of non-canonical Victorian fiction (1). Modernism's lingering legacy has meant, I would argue, that novels of religious controversy by women continue to comprise one of that continent's darkest reaches.For general surveys of nineteenth-century Anglo-American religious fiction, see Franchot, Leavis, Maison, Reynolds, Wolff. More specific studies of individual writers and works are beginning to be done, as suggested by new work presented at the 1998 18th- and 19th-Century Women Writers Conference (e.g., Cronin; Freed; Griffin, “Fathers”; LaMonaca; Melnyk).

Type
EDITORS' TOPIC: VICTORIAN RELIGION
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)