Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T19:37:31.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anatomical Response of St. Augustinegrass to Aminocyclopyrachlor Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Michael L. Flessner ,
Roland R. Dute  and
J. Scott McElroy
Michael L. Flessner*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
Roland R. Dute
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
J. Scott McElroy
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: mlf0010@auburn.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aminocyclopyrachlor (AMCP) is a synthetic auxin herbicide that controls primarily broadleaf (eudicotyledonous) weeds. Previous research indicates that St. Augustinegrass is unacceptably injured by AMCP. In light of the fact that synthetic auxin herbicides usually are safe when applied to monocotyledons, the mechanism for this injury is not fully understood. Anatomical response of St. Augustinegrass to AMCP was investigated using light microscopy. Apical meristem node tissue responded with callus tissue proliferation, abnormal location and development of the apical meristem, necrosis of the developing vascular tissue, vascular parenchyma proliferation, and xylem gum blockages. Node tissues away from the apical meristem responded with xylem gum blockages and the stimulation of lateral meristems and adventitious root formation. Root tip response to AMCP treatment was characterized by a loss of organization. Root tip apical meristem and vascular tissue maturation was disorganized. Additionally, lateral root generation occurred abnormally close to the root tip. These responses impair affected tissue functionality. Mature tissue was unaffected by AMCP treatment. All of these responses are characteristic of synthetic auxin herbicide treatment to other susceptible species. This research indicates that AMCP treatment results in St. Augustinegrass injury and subsequent death through deleterious growth stimulation and concomitant vascular inhibition.

Keywords

Aminocyclopyrachlor, DPX-KJM44, DPX-MAT28St. Augustinegrass, Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walter) Kuntz ‘Palmetto’®, STPSESynthetic auxin herbicide
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 59 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 263 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aloni, R. 1987. The induction of vascular tissues by auxin. Pages 336–374 in Davies, P. J., ed. Plant Hormones and Their Role in Plant Growth and Development. Boston Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Aloni, R. 2001. Foliar and axial aspects of vascular differentiation: hypothesis and evidence. J Plant Growth Regul. 20:22–34.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. 1996. Weed Science. 3rd ed. Long Grove, IL Waveland Press. Pp. 193–195.Google Scholar
Armel, G., Klingeman, W., Flanagan, P., Breeden, G., and Halcomb, M. 2009. Comparisons of the experimental herbicide DPX-KJM44 with aminopyralid for control of key invasive weeds in Tennessee. [Abstract] Proceedings of the Weed Science Society America. Orlando, FL Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Beal, J. 1951. Histological responses to growth-regulating substances. Pages 155–166 in Plant Growth Substances. Madison, WI University of Wisconsin Press. Pp. 155–166.Google Scholar
Berghaus, R. and Wuerzer, B. 1987. The mode of action of the herbicidal quinolinecarboxylic acid, quinmerac (BAS 518 H). Proc. Br. Crop Protection Conf.—Weeds. 3:1091–1096.Google Scholar
Blair, M. and Lowe, Z. 2009. Evaluation of KJM-44 for marestail (Conyza canadensis) and total vegetation control. [Abstract] Proceedings of the Weed Science Society of America. Orlando, FL: Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Bonsen, K. and Kučera, L. 1990. Vessel occlusions in plants: morphological, functional, and evolutionary aspects. Int. Assoc. Wood Anat. Bull. n.S. 11:393–399.Google Scholar
Brecke, B., Unruh, J., and Partridge-Telenko, D. 2010. Aminocyclopyrachlor for weed management in warm-season turfgrass. Proc. South Weed Sci. Soc. 63:193.Google Scholar
Callahan, L. and Engel, R. 1965. The effects of phenoxy herbicides on the physiology and survival of turfgrasses. USGA Greens Section Record. May:. Pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Carlton, W. 1943. Histological and cytological responses of roots to growth-regulating substances. Bot. Gaz. 105:268–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, M., Duke, S., and Fedtke, C. 1993. Physiology of Herbicide Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall. Pp. 295–309.Google Scholar
Dute, R., Miller, M., Davis, M., Woods, F., and McLean, K. 2002. Effects of ambrosia beetle attack on Cercis canadensis . Int. Assoc. Wood Anat. Bull. n.S. 23:143–160.Google Scholar
Eames, A. 1949. Comparative effect of spray treatments with growth-regulating substances on the nut grass Cyperus rotundus L., and anatomical modifications following treatment with butyl 2,4-dichlorophenoxy-acetate. Am. J. Bot. 36:571–584.Google Scholar
Eames, A. 1950. Destruction of phloem in young bean plants after treatment with 2,4-D. Am. J. Bot. 37:840–847.Google Scholar
Eames, A. 1951. A correlation of severity of 2,4-D injury with stage of ontogeny in monocot stems. Science. 114:203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flessner, M., McElroy, J., and Walker, R. 2009. Quantification of warm-season turfgrass phytotoxicity from broadleaf control herbicides. Proc. South Weed Sci. Soc. 62:24.Google Scholar
Fosket, D. 1968. Cell division and the differentiation of wound-vessel members in cultured stem segments of Coleus . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 59:1089–1096.Google Scholar
Grossman, K. 2000. The mode of action of quinclorac: A case study of a new auxin-type herbicide. Pages 181–214 in Cobb, A., and Kirkwood, R., eds. Herbicides and Their Mechanisms of Action. Sheffield, U.K. Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gunawardena, U. and Hawes, M. 2002. Tissue specific localization of root infection by fungal pathogens: role of root border cells. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 15:1128–1136.Google Scholar
Kaufman, P. 1953. Gross morphological responses of the rice plant to 2,4-D. Weeds. 2:223–253.Google Scholar
Kaufman, P. 1955. Histological responses of the rice plant (Oryza sativa) to 2,4-D. Am. J. Bot. 42:649–659.Google Scholar
Krikorian, A., Kelly, K., and Smith, D. 1987. Hormones in tissue culture and micro-propagation. Pages 593–613 in Davies, P. J., ed. Plant Hormones and Their Role in Plant Growth and Development. Boston, MA Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, A. 1949. The control of tillering in grasses by auxin. Am. J. Bot. 36:437–440.Google Scholar
Lewer, P. and Owen, W. 1989. Amino acid conjugation of triclopyr by soybean cell suspension cultures. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 33:249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewer, P. and Owen, W. 1990. Selective action of the herbicide triclopyr. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 36:187–200.Google Scholar
Lillie, R., ed. 1977. H. J. Conn's Biological Stains. 9th ed. Baltimore, MD William and Wilkins. 607 p.Google Scholar
Ljung, K., Bhalerao, R., and Sandberg, G. 2001. Sites and homeostatic control of auxin biosynthesis in arabidopsis during vegetative growth. Plant J. 28:465–474.Google Scholar
Murashige, T. 1974. Plant propagation through tissue cultures. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 25:135–166.Google Scholar
Peterson, R., Stephenson, G., and Mitchell, B. 1974. Effects of picloram on shoot anatomy of red maple and white ash. Weed. Res. 14:227–229.Google Scholar
Ruzin, S. 1999. Plant Microtechnique and Microscopy. New York, NY Oxford University Press. Pp. 33–116.Google Scholar
Scott, F. 1938. Anatomy of auxin-treated etiolated seedlings of Pisum sativum . Bot. Gaz. 100:167–85.Google Scholar
Senseman, S., ed. 2007. Herbicide Handbook. 9th ed. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 15, 322–361.Google Scholar
Sterling, T. and Hall, J. 1997. Mechanism of action of natural auxins and the auxinic herbicides. Pages 111–141 in Roe, M., Burton, J., and Kuhr, R., eds. Herbicide Activity: Toxicology, Biochemistry, and Molecular Biology. Amsterdam, Netherlands IOS Press.Google Scholar
Struckmeyer, B. 1951. Comparative effects of growth substances on stem anatomy. Plant Growth Substances. Madison, WI University of Wisconsin Press. Pp. 167–174.Google Scholar
Soukup, A. and Votrubová, O. 2005. Wound-induced vascular occlusions in tissues of the reed Phragmites australis: their development and chemical nature. New Phytol. 167:415–424.Google Scholar
Swanson, C. 1946. Histological responses of the kidney bean to aqueous sprays of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Bot. Gaz. 107:522–531.Google Scholar
Thimann, K. and Skoog, F. 1934. On the inhibition of bud development and other functions of growth substances in Vicia faba . Proc. R. Soc. Br. 114:317–339.Google Scholar
Torrey, J. 1957. Auxin control of vascular pattern formation in regenerating pea root meristems grown in vitro. Am. J. Bot. 44:859–870.Google Scholar
Turner, R., Claus, J., Hidalgo, E., Holliday, M., and Armel, G. 2009. Technical introduction of the new DuPont vegetation management herbicide aminocyclopyrachlor. [Abstract] Proceedings of the Weed Science Society of America. Orlando, FL Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Watson, D. 1950. Anatomical modification of velvet bent grass (Agrostis canina L.) caused by soil treatment with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Am. J. Bot. 37:424–431.Google Scholar
Wetmore, R. and Sorokin, S. 1955. On the differentiation of xylem. J. Arnold Arbor. Harvard Univ. 36:305–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, M. 1951. Anatomical modifications of bean roots following treatment with 2,4-D. Am. J. Bot. 38:79–91.Google Scholar