Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T23:47:56.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Effects of Diquat plus Copper Sulfate on Aquatic Organisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

B. E. May ,
R. S. Hestand  and
J. M. Van Dyke
B. E. May
Affiliation:
Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Fisheries Res. Lab., Eustis, FL. 32726
R. S. Hestand
Affiliation:
Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Fisheries Res. Lab., Eustis, FL. 32726
J. M. Van Dyke
Affiliation:
Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Fisheries Res. Lab., Eustis, FL. 32726
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Effects of herbicide combinations on aquatic invertebrates were evaluated in Inglis Reservoir, which is located in west coastal Florida. The addition of 6,7-dihydrodipyrido [1,2-a: 2′1′-c]pyrazinediium ion (diquat) plus the triethanolamine complex of copper sulfate (TAC) and diquat plus copper sulfate pentahydrate (CSP) for control of hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata Casp.) decreased the number of invertebrates inhabiting the treated areas. The diquat plus CSP combination exerted the greatest effect upon invertebrate numbers. Both herbicide combinations, however, did alter significantly the number of taxonomic groups in the areas. Invertebrate declines were due more generally to resultant habitat changes (i.e., loss of hydrilla) than to direct herbicide toxicity. The response of fish to the effects of the herbicide treatments on invertebrates could be ascribed to dietary changes, decreased growth rates, and possible mortality.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , May 1973 , pp. 249 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bond, C. E., Lewis, R. H., and Fryer, J. L. 1960. Toxicity of various herbicidal materials to fishes. Pages 96–100 in Biological problems of water pollution. 1959 Trans. Second Seminar on Biological Problems in Water Pollution, U.S. Public Health Service, Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
2. Crosby, D. G. and Tucker, R. K. 1966. Toxicity of aquatic herbicides to Daphnia magna . Science 154:289–290.Google Scholar
3. Gilderhus, P. A. 1967. Effects of diquat on bluegills and their food organisms. Progr. Fish-Cult. 29:67–74.Google Scholar
4. Hilsenhoff, W. 1966. Effect of diquat on aquatic insects and related animals. J. Econ. Entomol. 59:1520–1521.Google Scholar
5. Hiltibran, R. C. 1965. The effect of diquat on aquatic plants in central Illinois. Weeds 13:71–72.Google Scholar
6. Huish, M. T. 1957. Life history of the black crappie of lakes Eustis and Harris, Florida. Proc. Conf. Southeast. Assoc. Game and Fish Comm. 11:302–312.Google Scholar
7. Johnson, M. C. 1965. Control of aquatic plants in farm ponds in Ontario. Progr. Fish-Cult. 27:23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Lackey, R. T. and May, B. E. 1971. Use of sugar flotation and dye to sort benthic samples. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 100:794–797.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Lawrence, J. M., Funderburk, H. H., Blackburn, R. D., and Beasley, P. G. 1965. The status of diquat and paraquat as aquatic herbicides. Proc. Conf. Southeast. Assoc. Game and Fish Comm. 16:247–257.Google Scholar
10. Mullan, J. W. and Applegate, R. L. 1967. Centrarchid food habits in a new and old reservoir during and following bass spawning. Proc. Southeast. Assoc. Game and Fish Comm. 21:332–342.Google Scholar
11. Sanders, H. O. and Cope, O. B. 1966. Toxicities of several pesticides to two species of cladocerans. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 95:165–169.Google Scholar
12. Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967. Statistical methods. The Iowa State University Press., Ames, Iowa. 593 p.Google Scholar
13. Surber, E. W. and Pickering, Q. H. 1962. Acute toxicity of endothal, diquat, hyamine, dalapon, and silvex to fish. Progr. Fish-Cult. 24:164–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Van Valin, C. C. 1966. Persistence of 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile in aquatic environments. Advan. Chem. Ser. 66:271–279.Google Scholar
15. Walker, C. R. 1964. Dichlobenil (2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile) as a herbicide in fishery habitats. Weeds 12:267–269.Google Scholar
16. Ware, F. J. 1966. The food habits of channel catfish in south Florida. Proc. Conf. Southeast. Assoc. Game and Fish Comm. 12:283–287.Google Scholar
17. Wilbur, R. L. 1969. The redear sunfish in Florida. Fish. Bull. No. 5, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. p. 28–38.Google Scholar
18. Wilson, D. C. and Bond, Carl E. 1969. The effect of the herbicides diquat and dichlobenil (Casoron) on pond invertebrates, Part 1. Acute toxicity. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 98:438–443.Google Scholar