Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T15:27:53.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Competition of Florida Beggarweed and Sicklepod with Peanuts II. Effects of Cultivation, Weeds, and SADH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Gale A. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36830
Ellis W. Hauser
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. of Agr., Coastal Plain Sta., Tifton, GA 31794
W. J. Ethredge
Affiliation:
S.W. Br. Exp. Sta., Plains, GA 31780
S. R. Cecil
Affiliation:
GA. Sta., Experiment, GA 30212

Abstract

When peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) were not kept weed-free, a single cultivation 4 weeks after emergence increased yields substantially over those of non-cultivated peanuts. Cultivation had no effect, however, when peanuts were maintained weed-free for 4 or 8 weeks. The length of the weed-free periods, cultivation, and the presence or absence of peanuts all strongly influenced the density of the sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia L.) plants which grew above the canopy of peanut foliage. Peanut foliage, which was released from weed-free maintenance at 8 weeks but then competed with sicklepod until harvest, reduced the green weight of sicklepod 95 to 98% thus illustrating the competitive capacity of the peanut plant. Moderate stands of Florida beggarweed [Desmodium tortuosum (Sw.) DC] did not markedly affect yield of peanuts. Application of a growth regulator, succinic acid, 2,2-dimethylhydrazide (SADH), did not influence weed competition or yield of in-shell peanuts consistently at any of the three locations. Quality analyses showed that treatment variables did not modify the taste of peanuts; however, in some experiments, components of the market grade of in-shell peanuts were changed by SADH, cultivation, length of the weed-free period, and cultivation X length of the weed-free period.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brown, R.H. and Ethredge, W.J. 1974. Effects of succinic acid 2,2-dimethylhydrazide on yield and other characteristics of peanut cultivars. Peanut Sci. 1:2023.Google Scholar
2. Buchanan, G.A. and Burns, E.R. 1970. Influence of weed competition on cotton. Weed Sci. 18:149154.Google Scholar
3. Burnside, O.C. and Wicks, G.A. 1967. The effect of weed removal treatments on sorghum growth. Weeds 15:204207.Google Scholar
4. Dawson, J.H. 1964. Competition between irrigated field beans and annual weeds. Weeds 12:206208.Google Scholar
5. Dawson, J.H. 1965. Competition between irrigated sugar beets and annual weeds. Weeds 13:245249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hauser, E.W. and Buchanan, G.A. 1974. Control of Florida beggarweed and sicklepod in peanuts with dinoseb. Peanut Sci. 2:4044.Google Scholar
7. Hauser, E.W., Buchanan, G.A., and Ethredge, W.J. 1975. Competition of Florida beggarweed and sicklepod with peanuts. I. Weed-free maintenance and weed competition. Weed Sci. 23:368372.Google Scholar
8. Hauser, E.W., Cecil, S.R., and Dowler, C.C. 1973. Systems of weed control for peanuts. Weed Sci. 21:176180.Google Scholar
9. Hauser, E.W., Santelmann, P.W., Buchanan, G.A., and Rud, O.E. 1973. Controlling weeds in peanuts–Culture and uses. American Peanut Research and Education Association, Inc., Stone Printing Company, Roanoke, VA. 684 pp.Google Scholar
10. Hill, L.V. and Santelmann, P.W. 1969. Competitive effects of annual weeds on Spanish peanuts. Weed Sci. 17:12.Google Scholar
11. Smith, R.J. 1974. Competition of barnyardgrass with rice cultivars. Weed Sci. 22:423426.Google Scholar
12. Vester, Reafield, Buchanan, G.A., and Rodgers, E.G. 1974. Response of peanuts and broadleaf weeds to postemergence herbicide treatments. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 51.Google Scholar