Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T05:20:29.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Early-Season and Postharvest Herbicide Treatments on Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kimberly T. Winton  and
Jimmy F. Stritzke
Kimberly T. Winton
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Jimmy F. Stritzke
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Terbacil (3-tert-butyl-5-chloro-6-methyluracil), diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], hexazinone [3-cyclohexyl-6-(dimethylamino)-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione], and metribuzin [4-amino-6-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazin-5(4H)-one] controlled palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. ♯ AMAPA) in established alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) when applied after first harvest. However, these same herbicides did not control palmer amaranth when applied early-season in March. Alfalfa forage yields were increased when palmer amaranth was controlled. Residue levels of terbacil and its metabolites in alfalfa forage from plots treated postharvest with 1.1 kg/ha of terbacil were well below the 5-ppm tolerance level established for terbacil in alfalfa. There was some chlorosis of alfalfa foliage following the postharvest use of the 1.1 kg ai/ha of terbacil. There was also a yield reduction of alfalfa in two of the six experiments (one from a March and one from a June application) where 1.1 kg ai/ha of terbacil was evaluated.

Keywords

Palmer amaranthdiuronhexazinonemetribuzinterbacilAmaranthus palmeriAMAPA
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 33 , Issue 5 , September 1985 , pp. 708 - 713
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashton, F. M. and Crafts, A. S. 1973. Mode of Action of Herbicides. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 504 pp.Google Scholar
2. Clegg, M. D., Sullivan, Y., and Eastin, J. D. 1978. A sensitive technique of the rapid measurement of carbon dioxide concentrations. Plant Physiol. 62:924–926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Dutt, T. E., Harvey, R. G., Fawcett, R. S., Jorgensen, N. A., Larsen, H. J., and Schlough, D. A. 1979. Forage quality and animal performance as influenced by quackgrass (Agropyron repens) control in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) with pronamide. Weed Sci. 27:127–132.Google Scholar
4. Dutt, T. E., Harvey, R. G., and Fawcett, R. S. 1983. Influence of herbicides on botanical composition of alfalfa hay. Agron. J. 75:229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Holt, R. F. and Pease, H. L. 1977. Determination of terbacil and metabolite residues using microcoulometric gas chromatography. J. Agric. Food Chem. 25:373–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Kapusta, G. and Strieker, C. F. 1975. Selective control of downy brome in alfalfa. Weed Sci. 23:202–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Rhodes, R. C. 1977. Metabolism of (2-14C) terbacil in alfalfa. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46:549–552.Google Scholar
8. Shabir, A. and Fletcher, R. A. 1980. Reduced transpiration and increased water efficiency by diuron in corn (Zea mays L.). Weed Sci. 28:180–185.Google Scholar
9. Swan, D. G. 1978. Effect of repeated herbicide applications on alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Weed Sci. 26:151–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Wilson, R. G. 1981. Weed control in established dryland alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Weed Sci. 29:615–618.Google Scholar