Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T00:27:07.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors Affecting the Uptake of Endothall-14C by Hydrilla

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

William T. Haller  and
D. L. Sutton
William T. Haller
Affiliation:
Univ. of Florida, Agr. Res. Center; Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314
D. L. Sutton
Affiliation:
Univ. of Florida, Agr. Res. Center; Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Placing hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata Royle) in 2.7 and 5.4 μM solutions of carbon-14-labeled endothali [7-ox = abicyclo(2,2,1)heptane-2,3-dicarboxylic acid] under controlled conditions resulted in a sigmoid-shaped uptake curve for both herbicide concentrations. Apical sections of hydrilla, which included the apical bud, absorbed greater amounts of endothall-14C than sections excised from the center of the plant below the apical bud. Low concentrations of copper as copper sulfate pentahydrate solutions of 0.4 and 2.0 μM in combination with endothall-14C increased the amount of radioactivity found in hydrilla, but copper concentrations of 4.0, 8.0, and 16.0 μM inhibited endothall-14C uptake. The greatest uptake by hydrilla in 5.4 and 2.7 μM solutions of endothall-14C exposed to temperatures of 10, 20, and 30 C occurred in the 20 and 30 C solutions, respectively. Endothall-14C uptake was studied under light intensities of 0, 540, 5400, and 21,500 lux. Uptake of radioactivity from 2.7 and 5.4 μM solutions of endothall-14C was greatest at 540 and 21,500 lux, respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 21 , Issue 5 , September 1973 , pp. 446 - 448
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Blackburn, R. D., Boyer, K. A., and Timmer, C. E. 1971. Phytotoxicity of four formulations of the alkylamine salt of endothall on Hydrilla verticillata and fish. Hyacinth Contr. J. 9:55–58.Google Scholar
2. Blackburn, R. D., Bitting, L. E., and Weldon, L. W. 1966. Control of Elodea in a residential situation. Hyacinth Contr. J. 5:36–38.Google Scholar
3. Blackburn, R. D. and Weldon, L. W. 1969. Control of Hydrilla verticillata . Proc. S. Weed Conf. 22:317.Google Scholar
4. Canode, C. L., Robocker, W. C., and Muzik, T. J. 1962. Grass seed production as influenced by chemical control of Downy Brome. Weeds 10:216–219.Google Scholar
5. Davies, P. J. and Seaman, D. E. 1968. Uptake and translocation of diquat in Elodea. Weed Sci. 16:293–295.Google Scholar
6. Finnerty, D. W. and Klingman, D. L. 1962. Life cycles and control studies of some weed bromegrasses. Weeds 10:40–47.Google Scholar
7. Gross, R. E., Pugno, P., and Dugger, W. M. 1970. Observations on the mechanism of copper damage in Chlorella . Plant Physiol. 46:183–185.Google Scholar
8. Hall, W. C. 1952. Evidence on the auxin-ethylene balance hypothesis of foliar abscission. Bot. Gaz. 113:310–322.Google Scholar
9. Hiltibran, R. C. 1962. Duration of toxicity of endothall in water weeds. Weeds 10:17–19.Google Scholar
10. Hiltibran, R. C. 1963. Effect of endothall on aquatic plants. Weeds 11:256–258.Google Scholar
11. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 347. 32 pp.Google Scholar
12. Mackenzie, J. W. and Hall, L. 1967. Elodea control in Southeast Florida with diquat. Hyacinth Contr. J. 6:37–44.Google Scholar
13. Mann, J. D., Jordan, L. S., and Day, B. E. 1965. A survey of herbicides for their effect upon protein synthesis. Plant Physio. 40:151–155.Google Scholar
14. Mann, J. D. and Pu, M. 1968. Inhibition of lipid synthesis by certain herbicides. Weed Sci. 16:197–198.Google Scholar
15. Penner, D. and Ashton, F. M. 1968. Influence of dichlobenil, endothall, and bromoxynil on kinin control of proteolytic activity. Weed Sci. 16:323–326.Google Scholar
16. Price, A. 1969. The use of an amine salt of endothall in irrigation canals. Hyacinth Contr. J. 8:32–33.Google Scholar
17. Seale, C. C., Gangstad, E. O., Joyner, J. F., and Pate, J. B. 1951. Ramie production in the everglades. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Fla. 11:129–133.Google Scholar
18. Sutton, D. L., Blackburn, R. D., and Barlowe, W. C. 1971. Response of aquatic plants to combinations of endothall and copper. Weed Sci. 19:643–646.Google Scholar
19. Sutton, D. L., Haller, W. T., Steward, K. K., and Blackburn, R. D. 1972. Effect of copper on uptake of diquat-14C by hydrilla. Weed Sci. 20:581–583.Google Scholar
20. Sutton, D. L., Weldon, L. W., and Blackburn, R. D. 1970. Effect of diquat on uptake of copper in aquatic plants. Weed Sci. 18:703–707.Google Scholar
21. Wilson, S. M., Daniel, A., and Wilson, G. B. 1956. Cytological and genetical effects of the defoliant endothall. J. Hered. 47:151–155.Google Scholar
22. Yeo, R. R. 1970. Dissipation of endothall and effects on aquatic weeds and fish. Weed Sci. 18:282–284.Google Scholar