Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T22:51:03.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inhibited Mitotic Entry is the Cause of Growth Inhibition by Cinmethylin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mahmound H. El-Deek  and
F. Dan Hess
Mahmound H. El-Deek
Affiliation:
Peace Fellowship Program for Egypt
F. Dan Hess
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. & Plant Pathol., Purdue Univ., W. Lafayette, IN
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The herbicide cinmethylin {exo-1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-2-[(2-methylphenyl)methoxy]-7-oxabicyclo [2.2.1] heptane} inhibited oat (Avena sativa L. ‘Porter’) root growth during the first 6 h of treatment at a concentration of 6.7 × 10-8 M. A concentration of 1 × 10-8 M cinmethylin inhibited root growth within 12 to 18 h. Inhibition of shoot growth was less sensitive, but was inhibited by 36 to 48 h after treatment with 1 × 10-7 M and by 12 to 24 h after treatment with 1 × 10-5 M cinmethylin. Cinmethylin concentrations of 1 × 10-5 M and lower did not inhibit cell elongation in isolated oat coleoptiles during a 24-h exposure. Mitotic frequency in oat root tips was reduced after 12 h of treatment with 1 × 10-7 M cinmethylin. The frequency of all stages of mitosis (prophase, metaphase, and anaphase + telophase) was reduced. Concentrations of 1 × 10-6 M cinmethylin resulted in nearly complete arrest (87% inhibition) of mitosis. These data suggest cinmethylin inhibits growth by inhibiting entry of cells into mitosis. The cause of mitotic arrest is unknown; however, the mechanism appears to be different from other herbicides known to inhibit mitosis.

Keywords

Cell enlargementcell divisionmitosis, Avena sativa L.
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 5 , September 1986 , pp. 684 - 688
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brown, R. 1951. The effects of temperature on the durations of the different stages of cell division in the root tip. J. Exp. Bot. 2:96–110.Google Scholar
2. Canvin, D. T. and Friesen, G. 1959. Cytological effects of CDAA and IPC on germinating barley and peas. Weeds 6:153–156.Google Scholar
3. Deal, L. M. and Hess, F. D. 1980. An analysis of the growth inhibitory characteristics of alachlor and metolachlor. Weed Sci. 28:168–175.Google Scholar
4. Dhillon, N. S. and Anderson, J. L. 1972. Morphological, anatomical and biochemical effects of propachlor on seedling growth. Weed Res. 12:182–189.Google Scholar
5. Hess, F. D. 1982. Determining causes and categorizing types of growth inhibition induced by herbicides. Pages 207–230 in Moreland, D. E., St. John, J. B., and Hess, F. D., eds. Biochemical responses induced by herbicides. ACS Symp. Ser. 181. Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
6. Holmsen, J. D. and Hess, F. D. 1985. Comparison of the disruption of mitosis and cell plate formation in oat roots by DCPA, colchicine and propham. J. Exp. Bot. 36:1504–1513.Google Scholar
7. Howard, A. and Pelc, S. R. 1953. Synthesis of desoxyribonucleic acid in normal and irradiated cells, and its relation to chromosome breakage. Heredity 6 (Suppl.):261–273.Google Scholar
8. Jenson, W. A. 1962. Botanical Histochemistry. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco. 408 pages.Google Scholar
9. Long, J. H., May, J. W., and Goss, J. R. 1984. SD95481 – a new soil applied herbicide for use in broadleaf crops. WSSA Abstr. 24:104.Google Scholar
10. May, J. W. and Goss, J. R. 1984. SD95481, a new soil applied herbicide for use in soybeans, cotton, and peanuts. WSSA Abstr. 24:17.Google Scholar
11. McFarland, J. E. and Hess, F. D. 1985. Herbicidal activity of acetanalides parallels alkylation potential. WSSA Abstr. 25: 72.Google Scholar
12. Nitsch, J. P. and Nitsch, C. 1956. Studies on the growth of coleoptile and first internode sections. A new, sensitive, straightgrowth test for auxin. Plant Physiol. 31:94–111.Google Scholar
13. Parker, C. 1966. The importance of shoot entry in the action of herbicides applied to the soil. Weeds 14:117–121.Google Scholar
14. Ray, T. B. 1982. The mode of action of chlorsulfuron: A new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:10–17.Google Scholar
15. Ray, T. B. 1984. Site of action of chlorsulfuron. Plant Physiol. 75:827–831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Rost, T. L. 1977. Responses of the plant cell cycle to stress. Pages 111–143 in Rost, T. L. and Gifford, E. M. Jr., eds. Mechanisms and control of cell division. Dowden, Hutchinson, & Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, PA.Google Scholar
17. Rost, T. L. 1984. The comparative cell cycle and metabolic effects of chemical treatments on root tip meristems. III. Chlorsulfuron. J. Plant Growth Regul. 3:51–63.Google Scholar
18. Van't Hof, J. 1968. Experimental procedures for measuring cell population kinetic parameters in plant root meristems. Pages 95–117 in Prescott, D., ed. Methods in Cell Physiology. Vol. 3. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar