Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T18:21:39.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metolachlor and metribuzin losses in runoff as affected by width of vegetative filter strips

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Christopher H. Tingle
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
Michele Boyette
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
Glen P. Murphy
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762

Abstract

Tall fescue vegetative filter strips 0.5 to 4.0 m wide were evaluated for their ability to reduce losses of metolachlor, metribuzin, and runoff (water and sediment) in conventionally tilled soybean. Differences in the parameters studied were significant between filter and no filter strips, regardless of filter strip width. Two days after treatment, metribuzin concentration in runoff from the unfiltered treatment was 231 ng ml−1; filter strips reduced this amount to 119 ng ml−1 or less. Similar trends were observed with metolachlor, with concentrations of 1,009 ng ml−1 from the unfiltered, whereas filter strips of any width reduced this to 523 ng ml−1 or less. Metribuzin loss during the growing season was 41 g ai ha−1, or 9.8% of the amount applied when no filter strip was present. The addition of a filter strip, regardless of width, reduced cumulative metribuzin losses to 11 g ha−1 or less. Similar results were noted with metolachlor. Filter strips, regardless of width, reduced cumulative runoff and sediment loss at least 46 and 83%, respectively.

Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H., ed. 1994. Herbicide Handbook of the Weed Science Society of America. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America, pp. 197, 200.Google Scholar
Baker, J. L. and Johnson, H. P. 1983. Evaluating the effectiveness of BMP's from field studies. Pages 281-304 in Agricultural Management and Water Quality. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, J. L. and Mickelson, S. K. 1994. Application technology and best management practices for minimizing herbicide runoff. Weed Technol. 8: 862869.Google Scholar
Banks, P. A. and Robinson, E. L. 1982. The influence of straw mulch on the soil reception and persistence of metribuzin. Weed Sci. 30: 164168.Google Scholar
Banks, P. A. and Robinson, E. L. 1986. Soil reception and activity of acetochlor, alachlor, and metolachlor as affected by wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw and irrigation. Weed Sci. 34: 607611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baughman, T. A., Shaw, D. R., and Webster, E. P. 1995. Fluometuron and norflurazon losses from runoff in cotton. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 35: 222.Google Scholar
Brent, F. V. Jr. 1986. Soil Survey of Noxubee County, Mississippi. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 198 p.Google Scholar
Buttle, J. M. 1990. Metolachlor ttansport in surface runoff. J. Environ. Qual. 19: 531538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilaha, T. A., Reneau, R. B., Mostaghimi, S., and Lee, D. 1989a. Vegetative filter strips for agricultural nonpoint source pollution control. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 32: 513519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilaha, T. A., Sherrard, J. H., and Lee, D. 1989b. Long-term effectiveness of vegetative filter strips. Water Environ. Technol. 1: 419421.Google Scholar
Felsot, A. S., Mitchell, J. K., and Kenimer, A. L. 1990. Assessment of management practices for reducing pesticide runoff from sloping cropland in Illinois. J. Environ. Qual. 19: 539545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, K. C. and Dabney, S. M. 1993. Grass hedges reduce soil loss on no-till and conventional-till cotton plots. Pages 16-20 in Proceedings of the Southern Conservation Tillage Conference on Sustainable Agriculture. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Murphy, G. P. and Shaw, D. R. 1997. Effects of Vegetative Filter Strip Width on Reducing Fluometuron and Norflurazon Losses in Surface Runoff. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi Agricultural Forestry Experiment Station Bull. 214. 7 p.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Savage, K. E. 1977. Metribuzin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 25: 5559.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. R., Smith, C. A., and Hairston, J. E. 1992. Impact of rainfall and tillage systems on off-site herbicide movement. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 23: 18431858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spurlock, S. R. and Misra, S. K. 1989. Acreage Allocated to Conservation Tillage Practices in Mississippi. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi Agricultural Forestry Experiment Station Bull. 957. 8 p.Google Scholar
Sumner, H. R., Wauchope, D., Truman, C. C., Dowler, C. C., and Hook, J. E. 1992. A Rainfall Simulator and Plot Design for Mesoplot Runoff Studies. Paper 922611. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural Engineering.Google Scholar
Wauchope, R. D. 1978. The pesticide content of surface water draining from agricultural fields—a review. J. Environ. Qual. 4: 459472.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P. and Shaw, D. R. 1996. Impact of vegetative filter strips on herbicide loss in runoff from soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 44: 662671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, R. A., Huntrods, T., and Anderson, W. 1980. Effectiveness of vegetated buffer strips in controlling pollution from feedlot runoff. J. Environ. Qual. 9: 483487.Google Scholar