Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T05:17:46.860Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mode of Clopyralid Uptake by Honey Mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Rodney W. Bovey
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Range Sci. Dep., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
Hugo Hein Jr.
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Range Sci. Dep., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
Robert E. Meyer
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Range Sci. Dep., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843

Abstract

Leaves absorbed high amounts of clopyralid (3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acid) as foliar sprays on honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa Torr. # PRCJG) as indicated by concentrations of 10 μg/g fresh wt or more in basal stem phloem by 4 days after treatment. Small quantities of clopyralid (< 1 μg/g) were detected in basal stem phloem after spray applications of clopyralid to defoliated plants or roots treated by soil application. When applied to foliated plants, the 0.56 kg/ha of clopyralid killed 60% or more plants, but none were killed when clopyralid sprays were applied to defoliated plants or when 2.2 kg/ha of clopyralid was applied to the soil. Water, diesel oil plus water, or water plus surfactant were equally effective as clopyralid carriers as foliar sprays.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bovey, R. W. and Mayeux, H. S. Jr. 1980. Effectiveness and distribution of 2,4,5-T, triclopyr, picloram, and 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid in honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa). Weed Sci. 28:666670.Google Scholar
2. Bovey, R. W. and Meyer, R. E. 1981. The response of honey mesquite to herbicides. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. B-1363. 12 pp.Google Scholar
3. Bovey, R. W. and Meyer, R. E. 1985. Herbicide mixtures for control of honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa). Weed Sci. 33:349353.Google Scholar
4. Bovey, R. W. and Meyer, R. E. 1987. Influence of adjuvants and plant growth regulators on herbicide performance in honey mesquite. J. Plant Growth Regul. 5:225234.Google Scholar
5. Bovey, R. W., Hein, H. Jr., and Meyer, R. E. 1986. Concentration of 2,4,5-T, triclopyr, picloram, and clopyralid in honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) stems. Weed Sci. 34:211217.Google Scholar
6. Bovey, R. W., Hein, H. Jr., Meyer, R. E., and Bouse, L. F. 1987. Influence of adjuvants on the deposition, absorption, and translocation of clopyralid in honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa). Weed Sci. 35:253258.Google Scholar
7. Bovey, R. W., Hein, H. Jr., and Meyer, R. E. 1988. Phytotoxicity and uptake of clopyralid in honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) as affected by adjuvants and other herbicides. Weed Sci. 36:2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Cotterill, E. G. 1978. Determination of 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid residues in soil by gas chromatography of the 1-butyl ester. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 15:471474.Google Scholar
9. Jacoby, P. W., Meadors, C. H., and Foster, M. A. 1981. Control of honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa) with 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid. Weed Sci. 29:376378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Mann, R. K., Witt, W. W., and Rieck, C. E. 1986. Fosamine absorption and translocation in multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora). Weed Sci. 34:830833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 633 pp.Google Scholar