Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T18:26:10.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time and Temperature Requirements for Weed Seed Thermal Death

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ruth M. Dahlquist ,
Timothy S. Prather  and
James J. Stapleton
Ruth M. Dahlquist*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, P.O. Box 442339, Moscow, ID 83844-2339
Timothy S. Prather
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, P.O. Box 442339, Moscow, ID 83844-2339
James J. Stapleton
Affiliation:
Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program, Kearney Agricultural Center, University of California, 9240 S. Riverbend Ave., Parlier, CA 93648
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: rdahlquist@vandals.uidaho.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mortality of weed seeds at temperatures of 39, 42, 46, 50, 60, and 70 C was recorded through time under controlled laboratory conditions similar to those of soil solarization for six weed species: annual sowthistle, barnyardgrass, black nightshade, common purslane, London rocket, and tumble pigweed. Time and temperature requirements for thermal death varied considerably among the species studied. Barnyardgrass, London rocket, and annual sowthistle were more susceptible to heat treatment than black nightshade, common purslane, and tumble pigweed. Temperatures of 50 C and above were lethal for seeds of all species. Common purslane seeds were unaffected at 46 C and below, tumble pigweed and barnyardgrass seeds were unaffected at 42 C and below, and black nightshade seeds were unaffected at 39 C. Nonlinear models for mortality as a function of duration of heat treatment were developed for each species at each temperature at which mortality occurred. These models provide an empirical relationship for the construction of field-applicable decision models that could predict the accumulation of time and temperature combinations for effective solarization of weed seeds.

Keywords

Annual sowthistle, Sonchus oleraceus L. SONOLbarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. ECHCGblack nightshade, Solanum nigrum L. SOLNIcommon purslane, Portulaca oleracea L. POROLLondon rocket, Sisymbrium irio L. SSYIRtumble pigweed, Amaranthus albus L. AMAALSoil solarizationmethyl bromide alternatives

Information

Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 55 , Issue 6 , December 2007 , pp. 619 - 625
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Benech-Arnold, R. L., Sanchez, R. A., Forcella, F., Kruk, B. C., and Ghersa, C. M. Environmental control of dormancy in weed seed banks in soil. Field Crop Res. 2000. 67:105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Causton, D. R., Elias, C. O., and Hadley, P. Biometrical studies of plant growth, I: the Richards function, and its application in analyzing the effects of temperature on leaf growth. Plant Cell Environ. 1978. 1:163–184.Google Scholar
[CDFA] California Department of Food and Agriculture Approved treatment and handling procedures to ensure against nematode pest infestation of nursery stock. Nursery Inspection Procedures Manual. 2002. Sacramento, CA Plant Health and Pest Protection Services, Pest Exclusion Branch, NIPM Item 7. http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/pe/nipm.htm Accessed: June 8, 2005.Google Scholar
Coca, M. A., Almoguera, C., and Jordano, J. Expression of sunflower low-molecular-weight heat-shock proteins during embryogenesis and persistence after germination: localization and possible function implications. Plant Mol. Biol. 1994. 25:479–492.Google Scholar
Economou, G., Mavrogiannopoulos, G., and Paspatis, E. A. Stapleton, J.J., DeVay, J.E., Elmore, C.L., ed. Weed seed responsiveness to thermal degree hours under laboratory conditions and soil solarization in greenhouse. Soil solarization and integrated management of soilborne pests 1998. Rome Food Agriculture Organization. Pages 246–263. in.Google Scholar
Egley, G. H. High-temperature effects on germination and survival of weed seeds in soil. Weed Sci. 1990. 38:429–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F., Benech-Arnold, R. L., Sanchez, R., and Ghersa, C. M. Modeling seedling emergence. Field Crop Res. 2000. 67:123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundy, A. C. Predicting weed emergence: a review of approaches and future challenges. Weed Res. 2003. 43:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesketh, K. A. Solar heating of soil (solarization) as a method of weed control: effects on some weed species and a comparison of plastics. 1984. Davis, CA University of California, Davis. Pages 54. .Google Scholar
Horowitz, M., Regev, Y., and Herzlinger, G. Solarization for weed control. Weed Sci. 1983. 31:170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, M. and Taylorson, R. B. Effect of high temperatures on imbibition, germination, and thermal death of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seeds. Can. J. Bot. 1983. 61:2269–2276.Google Scholar
Martinez-Ghersa, M. A., Satorre, E. H., and Ghersa, C. M. Effect of soil water content and temperature on dormancy breaking and germination of three weeds. Weed Sci. 1997. 45:791–797.Google Scholar
Medina, C. and Cardemil, L. Prosopis chilensis is a plant highly tolerant to heat shock. Plant Cell Environ. 1993. 16:305–310.Google Scholar
Miles, J. E., Kawabata, O., and Nishimoto, R. K. Modeling purple nutsedge sprouting under soil solarization. Weed Sci. 2002. 50:64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R. P. 1973. Tetrazolium staining for assessing seed quality. Pages 347–366. in Heydecker, W. ed. Seed Ecology: Proceedings of the Nineteenth Easter School in Agricultural Science. London Butterworths.Google Scholar
Myers, R. H. 1986. Classical and Modern Regression with Applications. Boston, MA Duxbury. 169–177.Google Scholar
Peachey, R. E., Pinkerton, J. N., Ivors, K. L., Miller, M. L., and Moore, L. W. 2001. Effect of soil solarization, cover crops, and metham on field emergence survival of buried annual bluegrass (Poa annua) seeds. Weed Technol. 15:81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullman, G. S., DeVay, J. E., and Garber, R. H. 1981. Soil solarization and thermal death: a logarithmic relationship between time and temperature for four soilborne pathogens. Phytopathology. 71:959–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, B. and Benjamin, A. 1984. Solar heating of the soil: involvement of environmental factors in the weed control process. Weed Sci. 32:138–142.Google Scholar
Standifer, L. C., Wilson, P. W., and Porche-Sorbet, R. 1984. Effects of solarization on weed seed populations. Weed Sci. 32:569–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapleton, J. J. 2000. Soil solarization in various agricultural production systems. Crop Prot. 19:837–841.Google Scholar
Stapleton, J. J. and DeVay, J. E. 1986. Soil solarization: A non-chemical approach for management of plant pathogens and pests. Crop Prot. 5:190–198.Google Scholar
Stapleton, J. J., Elmore, C. L., and DeVay, J. E. 2000. Solarization and biofumigation help disinfest soil. Calif. Agric. 54:42–45.Google Scholar
Stapleton, J. J., Prather, T. S., Mallek, S. B., Ruiz, T. S., and Elmore, C. L. 2002. High temperature solarization for production of weed-free container soils and potting mixes. HortTechnology. 12:697–700.Google Scholar