Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:25:12.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Triallate Vapor Pressure and Volatilization from Glass Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. Grover ,
W. F. Spencer ,
W. J. Farmer  and
T. D. Shoup
R. Grover
Affiliation:
U. S. Dep. Agric.
W. F. Spencer
Affiliation:
U. S. Dep. Agric.
W. J. Farmer
Affiliation:
Univ. California, Riverside, CA 92521
T. D. Shoup
Affiliation:
Univ. California, Riverside, CA 92521
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Vapor pressures of technical-grade triallate [S-(2,3,3-trichloroallyl)diisopropylthiocarbamate] were calculated from the vapor density measurements determined at seven different temperatures, using a gas-saturation technique and solid adsorbent traps. The equation Log10P = 11.05 – (4401/T) delineated the relationship between the apparent vapor pressure and temperature, giving the triallate vapor pressure values from 1.083 × 10−4 to 16.371 × 10−4 mm Hg over the temperature range of 20 to 45 C. The vapor flux of triallate from glass surfaces was of the order of 5.7 μg cm−2 h−1 at 25 C.

Keywords

Herbicidevapor densityvapor loss
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 26 , Issue 5 , September 1978 , pp. 505 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashford, R. 1975. Triallate granule spacing effect on oat. Weed Sci. 23:470–472.Google Scholar
2. Banting, J. D. 1967. Factors affecting the activity of di-allate and tri-allate. Weed Res. 7:302–315.Google Scholar
3. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. Pesticide Program. Guidelines for registering pesticides in the United States. Federal Register 40(123):26829–26895, June 25.Google Scholar
4. Hartley, G. S. 1969. Evaporation of pesticides. Pages 115–134 in VanValkenburg, W., ed. Pesticidal formulations research, physical, and colloidal chemical aspects. Adv. Chem. Series 86.Google Scholar
5. Herbicide Handbook, 3rd Edition. 1974. Weed Science Society of America. 430 pp.Google Scholar
6. Molberg, E. S., Friesen, H. A., McCurdy, E. V., and Dryden, R. D. 1964. Placement of di-allate and tri-allate for control of wild oats in wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 44:351–357.Google Scholar
7. Phillips, F. T. 1971. Persistance of organochlorine insecticides on different substrates under different environmental conditions. I. The rate of loss of dieldrin and aldrin by volatilization from glass surfaces. Pestic. Sci. 2:255–266.Google Scholar
8. Smith, A. E. 1970. Degradation, adsorption, and volatility of diallate and tri-allate in prairie soils. Weed Res. 10:331–339.Google Scholar
9. Spencer, W. F. and Cliath, M. M. 1969. Vapor density of dieldrin. Environ. Sci. Technol. 3:670–674.Google Scholar
10. Spencer, W. F. and Cliath, M. M. 1974. Factors affecting vapor loss of trifluralin from soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 22:987–991.Google Scholar
11. Spencer, W. F., Shoup, T. D., and Cliath, M. M. 1977. Vapor behavior of benchmark pesticides. Final Rep., USDA-ARS and USEPA Interagency Agreement No. EPA-IAG-D5-H776, 41 pp.Google Scholar
12. Taylor, A. W., Glotfelty, D. E., Turner, B. C., Silver, R. E., Freeman, H. P. and Weiss, A. 1977. Volatilization rates of dieldrin and heptachlor residues from field vegetation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 24:542–548.Google Scholar
13. Thorn, A. S. 1968. The exchange of momentum, mass, and heat between an artificial leaf and the airflow in a wind-tunnel. Quart. J. Roy Meteorol. Soc. 94:44–55.Google Scholar
14. Turner, B. C. and Glotfelty, D. E. 1977. Field air sampling of pesticide vapors with polyurethane. Anal. Chem. 49:7–10.Google Scholar