Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T07:08:19.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficacy and Safening of Aryloxyphenoxypropionate Herbicides when Tank-Mixed with Triclopyr for Bermudagrass Control in Zoysiagrass Turf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

D. F. Lewis*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, P.O. Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
J. S. Mcelroy
Affiliation:
Auburn University, 201 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL 36849
J. C. Sorochan
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
T. C. Mueller
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
T. J. Samples
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
G. K. Breeden
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
*
Corresponding author E-mail: dustin_lewis@ncsu.edu.

Abstract

Aryloxyphenoxypropionate (AOPP) herbicides are used to control bermudagrass contamination in various turfgrasses. Applying AOPP herbicides alone can cause unacceptable injury to zoysiagrass but injury can be reduced when tank-mixed with triclopyr. There are limited data illustrating the extent of bermudagrass control and zoysiagrass cultivar tolerance when these compounds are combined. Research was conducted to determine the efficacy of multiple AOPP herbicides applied alone and tank-mixed with triclopyr for bermudagrass control in zoysiagrass turf. Treatments include three sequential applications of cyhalofop (0.32 kg ai ha−1), fenoxaprop (0.14 kg ha−1), fluazifop (0.11 kg ha−1), or quizalofop (0.09 kg ha−1) applied alone and tank-mixed with triclopyr (1.12 kg ae ha−1) applied to ‘Tifway’ bermudagrass, and ‘Diamond’, ‘Palisades’, and ‘Zenith’ zoysiagrass. Tifway bermudagrass control ranged from 41 to 69% and digital image analysis turf coverage data ranged from 18 to 50% for AOPP herbicides applied alone. The addition of triclopyr to AOPP herbicides increased bermudagrass control (64–79%) and reduced turf coverage (8–29%). Palisades and Zenith zoysiagrass exhibited less injury (1–18%) and greater turf coverage (84–86%) when AOPP herbicides were tank-mixed with triclopyr compared to AOPP herbicides applied alone. Diamond zoysiagrass was not tolerant to any AOPP herbicides applied alone or tank-mixed with triclopyr, except for fluazifop alone (18% injury and 93% turf coverage). Visual ratings and digital image analysis turf coverage data had a strong negative correlation over all tested turfgrasses. In general, AOPP herbicides plus triclopyr will control bermudagrass greater and injure zoysiagrass less compared to AOPP herbicides applied alone; however, these mixtures can cause unacceptable injury to Diamond zoysiagrass.

Los herbicidas Aryloxyphenoxypropionate (AOPP) son usados para controlar la contaminación de Cynodon spp. Rich en varias especies de céspedes. La aplicación de únicamente herbicidas AOPP pueden causar un daño inaceptable a la Zoysia spp., pero el daño puede reducirse cuando el herbicida se aplica mezclado con triclopyr. Existe poca información que ilustre el grado de control de la Cynodon spp. Rich. y de la tolerancia del cultivar de Zoysia spp., cuando los componentes se combinan. Se llevo al cabo una investigación para determinar la eficacia de aplicaciones múltiples de sólo herbicidas AOPP y de aplicaciones de mezclas de éste con triclopyr para controlar el Cynodon spp. Rich.; en los céspedes de Zoysia spp. Los tratamientos incluyeron tres aplicaciones secuenciales de cyhalofop (0.32 kg ia ha−1), fenoxaprop (0.14 kg ha−1), fluazifop (0.11 kg ha−1), o quizalofop (0.09 kg ha−1) aplicados solos y también mezclados con triclopyr (1.12 kg ea ha−1) a un híbrido de Cynodon llamado ‘Tifway’ Cynodon. dactylon (L.) Pers. X y Cynodon transvaalensis Burtt-Davy y a las variedades ‘Palisades’ y ‘Zenith’ de Zoysia japonica Steud., así como también a la variedad ‘Diamond’ de Zoysia matrella (L.) Merr. El control de ‘Tifway’, varió de (41 a 69%) y un análisis de imagen digital de información de cobertura de céspedes varió de (18 a 50%) para los herbicidas AOPP aplicados solos. La adición de triclopyr a los herbicidas AOPP incrementó el control de la Cynodon spp. Rich de (64 a 79%) y redujo la cobertura del césped de (8 a 29%). Las variedades de Zoysia japónica: ‘Palisades’ y ‘Zenith’ mostraron menos daño, de (1a18%) y mejor cobertura de (84 a 86%) cuando los herbicidas AOPP fueron mezclados con triclopyr en comparación con las aplicaciones de únicamente herbicidas AOPP. La Zoysia matrella (L.) Merr. ‘Diamond’ ZOYMA no toleró ningún herbicida aplicado solo o mezclado con tryclopyr, excepto el fluazifop solo (18% de daño y 93% de cobertura). Evaluaciones visuales y el análisis de imágenes digitales de cobertura tuvieron una fuerte correlación negativa para todos los céspedes probados. En general, los herbicidas AOPP más triclopyr controlarían mejor la Cynodon spp. Rich.,y dañarían en menor escala la Zoysia spp. Willd., en comparación con los herbicidas AOPP aplicados por sí solos. Sin embargo, estas mezclas pueden causar un daño inaceptable a la Zoysia matrella (L.) Merr. ‘Diamond’ ZOYMA.

Type
Weed Management—Other Crops/Areas
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, S. J. 2000. Taxonomy of Zoysia (Poaceae): Morphological and Molecular Variation. Ph.D. dissertation. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University. Pp. 7682.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , 2008. Turflon Ester® sample label. EPA Reg. No. 62719-258. Indianapolis, IN: Dow Agroscience LLC. 4 p.Google Scholar
Beard, J. B. 1973. Turfgrass Science and Culture. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Pp. 132146.Google Scholar
Bell, G. E., Martin, D. L., Kuzmic, R. M., Stone, M. L., and Solie, J. B. 2000. Herbicide tolerance of two cold-resistant bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) cultivars determined by visual assessment and vehicle-mounted optical sensing. Weed Technol. 14:635641.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. W. 2000. Kill off bermudagrass with one less spraying: replacing obsolete turf requires freedom from old bermudagrass. Golf Course Manage. 68:6871.Google Scholar
Carmer, S. G., Nyquist, W. E., and Walker, W. M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two or three factor treatment designs. Agron. J. 81:665672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cudney, D. W., Elmore, C. L., Gibealut, V. A., and Reints, J. S. 1997. Common bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) management in cool-season turfgrass. Weed Technol. 11:478483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dernoeden, P. H. 1989. Bermudagrass suppression and zoysiagrass tolerance to fenoxaprop. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 6:285290.Google Scholar
Engelke, M. C., Colbaugh, P. F., Reinert, J. A., Marcum, K. B., White, R. H., Ruemmele, B., and Anderson, S. J. 2002. Registration of ‘Diamond’ zoysiagrass. Crop Sci. 42:304305.Google Scholar
Ferrell, J. A., Murphy, T. R., and Bridges, D. C. 2005. Postemergence control of hybrid bermudagrass (Cynodon transvaalensis Burtt-Davy × Cynodon dactylon). Weed Technol. 19:636639.Google Scholar
Hassan, G., Mueller-Warrant, G., and Griffith, S. 2002. Differential sensitivity of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) cultivars to fenoxaprop. Weed Sci. 50:567575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. J. 1987. Turfgrass species response to herbicides applied postemergence. Weed Technol. 1:305311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. J. 1988. Glyphosate and SC-0224 for bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) cultivar control. Weed Technol. 2:2030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. J. 1992. Common bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) suppression in Zoysia spp. with herbicides. Weed Technol. 6:813819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. J. and Carrow, R. N. 1995. Influence of fenoxaprop and ethofumesate treatments on suppression of common bermudagrass in tall fescue. Weed Technol. 9:789793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. J. and Carrow, R. N. 1999. Tolerance of zoysiagrass (Zoysia spp.) cultivars to preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 13:706712.Google Scholar
Karcher, D. E. and Richardson, M. D. 2003. Quantifying turfgrass color using digital image analysis. Crop Sci. 43:943951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElroy, J. S. and Breeden, G. K. 2006. Triclopyr safens the use of fluazifop and fenoxaprop on zoysiagrass while maintaining bermudagrass suppression. App. Turfgrass Sci. May 2. p. 15.Google Scholar
Richardson, M. D., Karcher, D. E., and Purcell, L. C. 2001. Quantifying turfgrass cover using digital image analysis. Crop Sci. 41:18841888.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis System 2004. SAS/STAT User's Guide Release 9.0. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. Pp. 26612844.Google Scholar
Steckel, L. E., Craig, C. C., and Hayes, R. M. 2006. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control with glufosinate prior to planting no-till cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 20:10471051.Google Scholar
Teuton, T. C., Unruh, J. B., Brecke, B. J., Miller, G. L., and Mueller, T. C. 2005. Hybrid bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. × C. transvaalensis Burtt-Davy) control with glyphosate and fluazifop. Appl. Turfgrass Sci. Nov. 23. p. 16.Google Scholar
Turgeon, A. J. 1980. Turfgrass management. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing. Pp. 4567.Google Scholar
Yelverton, F. H., Hoyle, J. A., Gannon, T. W., and Warren, L. S. 2009. Plant counts, digital image analysis, and visual ratings for estimating weed control in turf: are they correlated? Abstract no. 392. Proc. Southern Weed Sci. Soc. 62:392.Google Scholar