Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T12:40:30.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Topsoil Thickness On Winter Annual Weed Biomass Production and Nutrient Flux

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David E. Pettry
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Richard E. Switzer
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
A. Wayne Cole
Affiliation:
Dept. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762

Abstract

The effects of topsoil thickness on winter annual weed growth and nutrient concentration were assessed for three consecutive years in soybean plots. The topsoil treatments had high fertility levels, uniform textures, and no herbicides were used in the study. Common chickweed composed 75% of the winter annual weed species. Weed biomass production decreased as topsoil thickness decreased from 22.5 cm to 0. Topsoil thickness of 22.5 cm produced 800 kg ha–1 more weed growth than 0 cm topsoil. The weed biomass grown in thicker topsoil had higher total amounts of N, K, Mg, and Ca.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Allison, L. E. 1935. Organic soil carbon by reduction of chromic acid. Soil Sci. 40:311320.Google Scholar
2. Bremmer, J. R. 1960. Determination of nitrogen in soils by the Kjeldahl method. J. Agric. Sci. 55:123.Google Scholar
3. Day, P. R. 1965. Particle fractionation and particle size analysis. in Black, C. A., ed., Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. Agron. 9:552562.Google Scholar
4. Flach, K. W. 1990. Low-input agriculture and soil conservation. J. Soil Water Conserv. 45:4244.Google Scholar
5. Frye, W. W., Ebelhar, S. A., Murdock, L.W., and Blevins, R. L. 1982. Soil erosion effects on properties and productivity of two Kentucky soils. Soil Sci. 46:10501055.Google Scholar
6. Hargrove, W. L. 1986. Winter legumes as a nitrogen source for no-till grain sorghum. Agron. J. 78:7074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Issac, R. A., and Kerber, J. D. 1971. Atomic absorption and flame photometry: Techniques and uses in soil, plant, and water analysis. p. 1737 in Walsh, L. M., ed., Instrumental Methods for Analysis of Soils and Plant Tissue. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, Wis. Google Scholar
8. Langdale, G. W., Box, J. E. Jr., Leonard, R. A., Barnett, A. P., and Fleming, W. G. 1979. Corn yield reduction on eroded Southern Piedmont Soils. J. Soil Water Conserv. 34:226228.Google Scholar
9. Mielke, L. N., and Schepers, J. S. 1986. Plant response to topsoil thickness on an eroded loess soil. J. Soil Water. Conserv. 41:5963.Google Scholar
10. Mitchell, W. H., and Teel, M. R. 1977. Winter-annual cover crops for no-tillage corn production. Agron. J. 69:569573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Peech, M. 1965. Exchange acidity. in Black, C. A., ed., Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. Agron. 9:914926.Google Scholar
12. Pimental, D., Allen, J., Beers, A., Guinand, L., Linder, R., McLaughlin, P., Meer, B., Musonda, D., Perdue, D., Poisson, S., Siebert, S., Stoner, K., Salazar, R., and Hawkins, A. 1987. World agriculture and soil erosion. Bioscience 37:277283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Ripley, P. O., Kalbfleisch, W., Bourget, S. J., and Cooper, D. J. 1961. Soil erosion by water damage, prevention, control. Publ. No. 1083, Research Branch, Can. Dep. Agric. Ottawa, Ont. Google Scholar
14. Schertz, D. L., Moldenhauer, W. C., Livingston, S. J., Weesies, G. A., Hintz, E. A. 1989. Effects of past soil erosion on crop productivity in Indiana. J. Soil Water Conserv. 44:604608.Google Scholar
15. U.S. Dep. Agric. 1981. National Soil Erosion–Soil Productivity Research Planning Committee, Sci. Educ. Adm., Agric. Res. Soil erosion effects on soil productivity: a research perspective. J. Soil Water Conserv. 36:8290.Google Scholar