Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T17:22:56.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicide Evaluation for Fresh Market Celery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Oleg Daugovish ,
Steven A. Fennimore  and
Richard F. Smith
Oleg Daugovish*
Affiliation:
University of California Cooperative Extension, Ventura, CA 93003
Steven A. Fennimore
Affiliation:
University of California, Salinas, CA 93905
Richard F. Smith
Affiliation:
University of California Cooperative Extension, Salinas, CA 93905
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: odaugovish@ucdavis.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted near Oxnard, CA and in two locations near Salinas, CA in 2002 and 2003 to evaluate efficacy and safety of six herbicides in celery. s-metolachlor at 0.6 and 0.7 kg ai/ha and flufenacet at 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 kg ai/ha PRE were safe to celery and controlled 81 to 94% of yellow nutsedge at densities < 20 plants/m2. At yellow nutsedge densities > 20 plants/m2, the most efficacious treatments were 1.1 kg/ha of s-metolachlor or 0.7 kg/ha of flufenacet, which reduced nutsedge densities by 71 or 53%, respectively; however, both resulted in slight injury to celery. All other herbicides generally did not injure celery and none reduced marketable crop yield. Flumioxazin pretransplant (PRE) at 0.1 and 0.2 kg ai/ha controlled broadleaf weeds near 100% at all locations, suggesting that it can be an effective alternative to standard linuron and prometryn, which are applied post-transplant (POST) in celery.

Keywords

S-metolachlorflufenacetflumioxazinprometrynlinuronoxyfluorfenyellow nutsedgeCyperus esculentus L. CYPEScelery, Apium graveolens L.Celery weed control
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 719 - 723
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Agricultural Commissioner Annual Report-Monterey County, California 2005. http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/ag/pdfs/2005_CropReport.pdf. Accessed: August 12, 2006.Google Scholar
Agricultural Commissioner Annual Report-Ventura County, California 2005. http://www.ventura.org/agcommissioner/Public_records/VC/Public_records/VC20Crop20Report202005.pdf. Accessed: August 12, 2006.Google Scholar
Bell, C. E., Smith, R. F., and Bendixen, W. E. 2001. Integrated weed control in celery. University of California, Pest Management Guidelines. http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/PMGcrops-agriculture.html. Accessed: August 12, 2006.Google Scholar
‘Define’ Label/MSDS 2004. http://www.bayercropscienceus.com/products/view/define/labels.html. Accessed: February 10, 2006.Google Scholar
Fennimore, S. A., Smith, R. F., and McGiffen, M. E. 2001. Weed management in fresh market spinach (Spinaca oleracea) with S-metolachlor. Weed Technol. 15:511–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichar, W. J., Lemon, R. G., Brewer, K. D., and Minton, B. W. 2001. S-metolachlor compared with metolachlor on yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 15:107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haar, M. J., Fennimore, S. A., McGiffen, M. E., Lanini, W. T., and Bell, C. E. 2002. Evaluation of preemergence herbicides in vegetable crops. Weed Technol. 12:95–99.Google Scholar
Hembree, K. 1998. Developing a program for the control of yellow nutsedge. Proceedings of the California Weed Science Society http://www.cwss.org/1998/180.pdf. Accessed: January 5, 2005.Google Scholar
IR-4 2005. Interregional Research Project No. 4. http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/ir4/index.html. Accessed: August 12, 2006.Google Scholar
Koike, S. T., Schulbach, K. F., and Charay, W. E. 1996. Celery production in California. Vegetable Research and Information Center, Vegetable Production Series. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. 2. Cooperative Extension Publication 7220.Google Scholar
Ogbuchiekwe, E. J. and McGiffen, M. E. Jr. 2001. Efficacy and economic value of weed control for drip and sprinkler irrigated celery. HortScience 36:1278–1282.Google Scholar
Smith, R. F. 2005. Integrated weed control in celery. University of California, Pest Management Guidelines http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/PMG/r104700111.html. Accessed: August 12, 2006.Google Scholar
USDA NASS 2006. Vegetables 2005 Summary. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service Publication. 15. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/VegeSumm/VegeSumm-01-27-2006.pdf. Accessed: August 12, 2006.Google Scholar
[US EPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2001. Tolerance Reassessment Status (dated 3.19.01). http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/tolerances/pdf_files/tol_reassessment_status.pdf. Accessed: August 12, 2006.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. E., Nissen, S. J., and Thompson, A. 2002. Variety and weed response to sulfentrazone and flumioxazin. Weed Technol. 16:567–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar