Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T13:20:50.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) Control with Several Grass Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mark A. Ferrell
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071
Thomas D. Whitson
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071
David W. Koch
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071
A. E. Gade
Affiliation:
Cooperative Extension Service, Sundance, WY 82729

Abstract

Studies were established near Devil's Tower in Crook County, WY, to determine the potential of 11 grass species to compete with leafy spurge as an alternative to repetitive herbicide treatments. Of the 11 species, ‘Bozoisky’ Russian wildrye and ‘Luna’ pubescent wheatgrass showed the most promise for successful competition with leafy spurge and were selected for further study. Pubescent wheatgrass limited percent canopy cover of leafy spurge to 10 and 15% or less in tilled and no-till plots, respectively, 7 and 10 yr after seeding. Russian wildrye limited percent canopy cover of leafy spurge to 21% or less in tilled and 7 and 27% in the no-till plots, respectively, 7 or 10 yr after seeding. The control plots not seeded to a forage grass averaged 55% leafy spurge canopy cover.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Carter, J. F. 1962. Herbage sampling for yield: tame pasture. In Kennedy, W. K. and Reid, J. T., eds. Pasture and Range Research Techniques, Part IV. Determination of Herbage Production and Yield. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press. pp. 90101.Google Scholar
Hafenrichter, A. L., Schwendiman, J. L., Harris, H. L., McLauchlan, R. S., and Miller, H. W. 1968. Grasses and legumes for soil conservation in the Pacific North west and Great Basin States. USDA Agric. Handb. 339. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 69 p.Google Scholar
Hein, D. G. 1988. Single and repetitive picloram treatments on leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) and resulting changes in shoot density, canopy cover, forage productions and utilization by cattle. . University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY. 94 p.Google Scholar
Lym, R. G. and Kirby, D. R. 1987. Cattle foraging behavior in leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula)-infested rangeland. Weed Technol. 1:314318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lym, R. G. and Tober, D. A. 1997. Competitive grasses for leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) reduction. Weed Technol. 11:787792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, L. A. 1979. Studies on the reproductive biology of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). Weed Sci. 27:106109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onsager, J. A., ed. 1987. Integrated Pest Management: State-of-the Art in the Sagebrush Ecosystem. USDA Agriculture Research Service, ARS-50. 85 p.Google Scholar
Rogler, G. A. and Schaaf, H. M. 1963. Growing Russian wildrye in the western states. USDA Leafl. 524. 8 p.Google Scholar
Selleck, G. W. 1959. 1) Leafy spurge control with 2,4-D 2) Granular herbicides on leafy spurge and toadflax. Proc. North Central Weed Control Conf. Winnipeg, Manitoba. p. 70.Google Scholar
Smoliak, S. and Dormaar, J. F. 1985. Productivity of Russian wildrye and crested wheatgrass and their effect on prairie soils. J. Range Manage. 38:403405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vore, R. E. and Alley, H. P. 1982. Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.), Wyoming chemical control research. Laramie, WY. Univ. Wyoming Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. MP-46R. 43 p.Google Scholar