Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-747cfc64b6-fkkrz Total loading time: 0.278 Render date: 2021-06-11T14:17:19.723Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

The Psychology of Repression and Polarization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2020

Abstract

How does political polarization occur under repressive conditions? Drawing on psychological theories of social identity, the author posits that the nature of repression drives polarization. Repression alters group identities, changing the perceived distance between groups and ultimately shaping the level of affective and preference polarization between them through differentiation processes. The author tests the proposed causal relationship using mixed-method data and analysis.The results of a laboratory experiment reveal that exposure to a targeted repression prime results in greater in-group identification and polarization between groups, whereas exposure to a widespread prime results in decreased levels of these same measurements. The effect of the primes appears to be mediated through group identification. Case-study evidence of polarization between political opposition groups that were differently repressed in Egypt and Tunisia reinforces these results. The findings have implications for understanding how polarization, as conditioned by repression, may alter the likelihood of the cooperative behavior among opposition actors necessary for the success of democratic politics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Abed-Kotob, Sana. 1995. “The Accommodationists Speak: Goals and Strategies of the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt.International Journal of Middle East Studies 27, no. 3: 321–39. doi: 10.1017/S0020743800062115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H., and Larry, M. Bartels. 2017. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, James, and Somer-Topcu, Zeynep. 2009. “Policy Adjustment by Parties in Response to Rival Parties’ Policy Shifts: Spatial Theory and the Dynamics of Party Competition in Twenty-Five Post-War Democracies.British Journal of Political Science 39, no. 4: 825–46. doi: 10.1017/S0007123409000635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Awadi, Hesham. 2004. In Pursuit of Legitimacy: The Muslim Brothers and Mubarak, 1982-2000. London, UK: Taurus.Google Scholar
Albrecht, Holger. 2005. “How Can Opposition Support Authoritarianism? Lessons from Egypt.Democratization 12, no. 3: 378–97. doi: 10.1080/13510340500126798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, Holger. 2010. “Political Opposition and Arab Authoritarianism: Some Conceptual Remarks.” In Albrecht, Holger, ed., Contentious Politics in the Middle East: Political Opposition under Authoritarianism. Gainesville, Fla.: University Press of Florida: 1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Madini, Tawfiq. 2012. Tarikh al-Mu’arida al-Tunsiyya min al-nisha ila al-thawra. Tunis, Tunisia: Sotupresse.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2016. “Tunisia: Severe Restrictions on Liberty and Movement: Latest Symptoms of Repressive Emergency Law.” March 1. At https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2016/03/tunisia-severe-restrictions-on-lib erty-and-movement-latest-symptoms-of-repressive-emergency-law/, accessed January 14, 2020.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1966. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York, N.Y.: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Baron, Reuben M., and David, A. Kenny. 1986. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, no. 6: 1173–82. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastian, Brock, Jetten, Jolanda, and Laura, J. Ferris. 2014. “Pain as Social Glue: Shared Pain Increases Cooperation.Psychological Science 25, no. 11: 2079–85. doi: 10.1177/0956797614545886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellin, Eva. 2004. “The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in Comparative Perspective.Comparative Politics 36, no. 2: 139–57. doi: 10.2307/4150140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and Checkel, Jeffrey T., eds. 2014. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Jonah, and Katherine, L. Milkman. 2012. “What Makes Online Content Viral?Journal of Marketing Research 49, no. 2: 192205. doi: 10.1509/jmr.10.0353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaydes, Lisa. 2018. State of Repression: Iraq under Saddam Hussein. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bougher, Lori D. 2017. “The Correlates of Discord: Identity, Issue Alignment, and Political Hostility in Polarized America.Political Behavior 39, no. 3: 731–62. doi: 10.1007/s11109-016-9377-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Michael, and van de Walle, Nicholas. 1997. Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B. 1979. “In-group Bias in the Minimal Intergroup Situation: A Cognitive-Motivational Analysis.Psychological Bulletin 86, no. 2: 307–24. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B. 1996. “When Contact Is Not Enough: Social Identity and Intergroup Cooperation.International Journal of Intercultural Relations 20, no. 3–4: 291303. doi: 10.1016/0147-1767(96)00020-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B., and Rupert, J. Brown. 1998. “Intergroup Conflict.” In Gilbert, Daniel T., Fiske, Susan T., and Lindzey, Gardner, eds., The Handbook of Social Psychology , 4th ed., vol. 2. Boston, Mass.: McGraw-Hill: 554-94.Google Scholar
Brewer, Marilyn B., and Michael, D. Silver. 2000. “Group Distinctiveness, Social Identity, and Collective Mobilization.” In Stryker, Sheldon, Owens, Timothy J., and White, Robert W., eds., Self, Identity, and Social Movement. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press: 153–71.Google Scholar
Brown, Norman R., Peter, J. Lee, Mirna Krsiak, Frederick G.Conrad, Tia G. B.Hansen, Jelena Havelka, and John, R. Reddon. 2009. “Living in History: How War, Terrorism, and Natural Disaster Affect the Organization of Autobiographical Memory.Psychological Science 20, no. 4: 399405. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02307.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, Rupert J. 1984. “The Effects of Intergroup Similarity and Cooperative versus Competitive Orientation on Intergroup Discrimination.British Journal of Social Psychology 23, no. 1: 2133. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00605.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, Jason. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, Jason, Masoud, Tarek, and Reynolds, Andrew. 2015. The Arab Spring: Pathways of Repression and Reform. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campagna, Joel. 1996. “From Accommodation to Confrontation: The Muslim Brotherhood in the Mubarak Years.Journal of International Affairs 50, no. 1: 278304. At https://www.jstor.org/stable/24357413, accessed January 30, 2020.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. 1958. “Common Fate, Similarity, and Other Indices of the State of Aggregates of Persons as Social Entities.Behavioral Science 3, no. 1: 1425. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830030103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Donald. 1965. Ethnocentric and Other Altruistic Motives. Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Janine A. 2006. “The Conditions of Islamist Moderation: Unpacking Cross-Ideological Cooperation in Jordan.International Journal of Middle East Studies 38, no. 4: 539–60. doi: 10.1017/S0020743806412460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1987. “Electoral Equilibrium under Alternative Voting Institutions.American Journal of Political Science 31, no. 1: 82108. doi: 10.2307/2111325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 2015. How Social Movements Die: Repression and Demobilization of the Republic of New Africa. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deegan-Krause, Kevin. 2007. “New Dimensions of Political Cleavage.” In Dalton, Russell J. and Klingemann, Hans Dieter, eds., Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry J. 2002. “Elections without Democracy: Thinking about Hybrid Regimes.Journal of Democracy 13, no. 2: 2135. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Lupia, Arthur. 2000. “Preference Formation.Annual Review of Political Science 3: 124. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. [1912] 2001. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Trans. Carol Cosman. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Anne R. 1970. “Inmate Adaptations and Socialization in the Prison.Sociology 4, no. 2: 213–25. doi: 10.1177/003803857000400205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Ghobashy, Mona. 2005. “The Metamorphosis of the Egyptian Muslim Brothers.International Journal of Middle East Studies 37, no. 3: 373–95. doi: 10.1017/S0020743805052128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Christopher, and James, A. Stimson. 2012. Ideology in America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey, and Whitefield, Stephen. 2000. “Explaining the Formation of Electoral Cleavages in Post-Communist Democracies.” In Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Mochman, Ekkehard, and Newton, Kenneth, eds., Elections in Central and Eastern Europe: The First Wave. Berlin, Germany: Sigma.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., and Samuel, J. Abrams. 2008. “Political Polarization in the American Public.Annual Review of Political Science 11: 563–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Free, Lloyd A., and Cantril, Hadley. 1967. Political Beliefs of Americans: A Study of Public Opinion. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, Steven. 2004. “Social Identity Theory and Party Identification.Social Science Quarterly 85, no. 1: 136–53. doi: 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08501010.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2007. Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Sanín, Francisco, and Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2017. “What Should We Mean by ‘Pattern of Political Violence’? Repertoire, Targeting, Frequency, and Technique.Perspectives on Politics 15, no. 1: 2041. doi: 10.1017/S1537592716004114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Robert, R. Kaufman. 2016. “Democratization during the Third Wave.Annual Review of Political Science 19: 125–44. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-042114-015137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 2005. “Preference Formation as a Political Process: The Case of Monetary Union in Europe.Preferences and Situations. New York, N.Y.: Russell Sage Foundation: 129–60.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 2010. “Historical Institutionalism in Rationalist and Sociological Perspective.” In Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, eds., Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harber, Kent D., and Dov, J. Cohen. 2005. “The Emotional Broadcaster Theory of Social Sharing.Journal of Language and Social Psychology 24, no. 4: 382400. doi: 10.1177/0261927X05281426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugbølle, Rikke Hostrup, and Cavatorta, Francesco. 2011. “Will the Real Tunisian Opposition Please Stand Up? Opposition Coordination Failures under Authoritarian Constraints.British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 38, no. 3: 323–41. doi: 10.1080/13530194.2011.621696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen, and Kuhonta, Erik Martinez, eds. 2015. Party Institutionalization in Asia: Democracies, Autocracies, and the Shadows of the Past. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Michael A., and John, C. Turner. 1987. “Intergroup Behaviour, Self Stereotyping and the Salience of Social Categories.British Journal of Social Psychology 26, no. 4: 325–40. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00795.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holder, R. Clemente. 1994. “Egyptian Lawyer’s Death Triggers Cairo Protests.” Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. July–August: 60–62. At https://www.wrmea.org/1994-july-august/human-rights-egyptian-lawyer-s-death-triggers-cairo-protests.html, accessed January 14, 2020.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Murray, and Jacob, M. Rabbie. 1982. “Individuality and Membership in the Intergroup System.” In Tajfel, Henry, ed., Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Marc Morjé, and Philip, G. Roessler. 2006. “Liberalizing Electoral Outcomes in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes.American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 2: 365–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00189.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 1993. “Human Rights Watch World Report 1993—Tunisia.” January 1. At http://www.refworld.org/docid/467fca77c.html, accessed January 14, 2020.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, Okla.: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group. 2008. “Egypt’s Muslim Brothers: Confrontation or Integration?” June 18. Middle East and North Africa Report no. 76. At https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/north-africa/egypt/egypt-s-muslim-brothers-confrontation-or-integration, accessed January 14, 2020.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Lelkes, Yphtach, Levendusky, Matthew, Malhotra, Neil, and Sean, J. Westwood. 2018. “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States.Annual Review of Political Science 22: 129–46. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Gaurav, and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.Public Opinion Quarterly 76, no. 3: 405–31. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfs038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Sean, J. Westwood. 2015. “Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.American Journal of Political Science 59, no. 3: 690707. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaafar, Mustapha Ben. 2014. Un si long chemin vers la démocratie. Tunis, Tunisia: Nirvana.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katznelson, Ira, and Barry, R. Weingast. 2005. “Intersections between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism.” In Katznelson, Ira and Weingast, Barry R., eds., Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection Between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism. New York, N.Y.: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira, and Zolberg, Aristide R.. 1986. Working-Class Formation: Nineteenth-Century Patterns in Western Europe and the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Caroline. 1989. “Political Identity and Perceived Intragroup Homogeneity.British Journal of Social Psychology 28, no. 3: 239–50. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1989.tb00866.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Andrea. 2014. “Tunisia’s Women: Partners in Revolution.Journal of North African Studies 19, no. 2: 186–99. doi: 10.1080/13629387.2013.870424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Mansfeldova, Zdenka, Markowski, Radoslaw, and Tóka, Gábor. 1999. Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred, eds. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Europe. Baltimore, Md.: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M., and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” In Lipset, Seymour M. and Rokkan, Stein, eds., Party Systems and Voters Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York, N.Y.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lupu, Noam, and Riedl, Rachel Beatty. 2013. “Political Parties and Uncertainty in Developing Democracies.Comparative Political Studies 46, no. 11: 1339–65. doi: 10.1177/0010414012453445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2005. Structuring Conflict in the Arab World: Incumbents, Opponents, and Institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, Diane M. 1986. “Social Identification Effects in Group Polarization.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50, no. 4: 720–28. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macmaster, Neil. 2004. “Torture: From Algiers to Abu Ghraib.Race and Class 46, no. 2: 121. doi: 10.1177/0306396804047722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mael, Fred A., and Lois, E. Tetrick. 1992. “Identifying Organizational Identification.Educational and Psychological Measurement 52, no. 4: 813–24. doi: 10.1177/0013164492052004002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen, eds. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1989. “Transitions to Democracy and Democratic Consolidation: Theoretical and Comparative Issues.” Working Paper no. 130. South Bend, Ind.: Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame. At https://kellogg.nd.edu/documents/1324, accessed January 14, 2020.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, O’Donnell, Guillermo, and Samuel Valenzuela, J., eds. 1992. Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective. South Bend, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2015. “‘I Disrespectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.American Journal of Political Science 59, no. 1: 128–45. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John D., and Mayer, N. Zald. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.American Journal of Sociology 82, no. 6: 1212–41. doi: 10.1086/226464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Keith, T. Poole, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McFaul, Michael. 2002. “The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World.World Politics 54, no. 2 (January): 212–44. doi: 10.1353/wp.2002.0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., Gurin, Patricia, Gurin, Gerald, and Malanchuk, Oksana. 1981. “Group Consciousness and Political Participation.American Journal of Political Science 25, no. 3: 494511. doi: 10.2307/2110816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Emma. 1999. Economic and Political Change in Tunisia: From Bourguiba to Ben Ali. Houndsmills, U.K.: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mzali, Mohamed. 1991. Tunisie: quel avenir? Paris, France: Publisud.Google Scholar
Ng, Sik Hung, and Wilson, Shelley. 1989. “Self-Categorization Theory and Belief Polarization among Christian Believers and Atheists.British Journal of Social Psychology 28, no. 1: 4756. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1989.tb00845.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nugent, Elizabeth R. 2019. “Personal Exposure to Repression and Political Preferences: Evidence from Tunisia.” Working paper.Google Scholar
Nugent, Elizabeth R. 2020a. “Replication Data for: The Psychology of Repression and Polarization.” Harvard Dataverse, V1. doi: 10.7910/DVN/ZZIQBB.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nugent, Elizabeth R. 2020b. “Supplementary material for: The Psychology of Repression and Polarization.” doi: 10.1017/S0043887120000015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nugent, Elizabeth R.Forthcoming. After Repression: How Polarization Derails Democratic Transitions. Princeton. N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule, vol. 4: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, Daniel J. 1990. Persuasion: Theory and Research. Newbury Park, Calif.: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Peters, Edward. 1985. Torture. New York, N.Y.: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Re-forms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Sprague, John. 1986. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ramadan, Abdel Azim. 1993. “Fundamentalist Influence in Egypt: The Strategies of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Takfir Groups.” In Marty, Martin E., and Scott Appleby, R., eds., Fundamentalisms and the State: Remaking Polities, Economies and Militance. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Riedl, Rachel Beatty. 2014. Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Party Systems in Africa. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Daniel P. 2015. The Iron Cage of Liberalism: International Politics and Unarmed Revolutions in the Middle East and North Africa. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Jon C., and Joseph, L. Sutherland. 2016. “How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization.Political Behavior 38, no. 2: 485508. doi: 10.1007/s11109-015-9323-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1969. “Politics, Ideology, and Belief Systems.American Political Science Review 63, no. 2: 398411. doi: 10.1017/S0003055400262291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2006. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Schuman, Howard, Robert, F. Belli, and Bischoping, Katherine. 1997. “The Generational Basis of Historical Knowledge.” In Pennebaker, James W., Paez, Dario, and Rimé, Bernard, eds., Collective Memories of Political Events: Social Psychological Perspectives. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.Google Scholar
Schuman, Howard, and Scott, Jacqueline. 1989. “Generations and Collective Memories.American Sociological Review 54, no. 3: 359–81. doi: 10.2307/2095611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwedler, Jillian, and Janine, A. Clark. 2006. “Islamist-Leftist Cooperation in the Arab World.ISIM Review 18, no. 1: 1011. At https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/17077/ISIM_18_Islamist-Leftist_Cooperation_in_the_Arab_World.pdf?sequence=1, accessed January 14, 2020.Google Scholar
Shehata, Dina. 2010. Islamists and Secularists in Egypt: Opposition, Conflict and Cooperation. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, and Yough, Syng Nam. 1978. “Left-Right Polarization in National Party Systems: A Cross-National Analysis.Comparative Political Studies 11, no. 3: 355–79. doi: 10.1177/001041407801100304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Bernd. 1992. “Intragroup Differentiation in Terms of Ingroup and Outgroup Attributes.European Journal of Social Psychology 22, no. 4: 407–13. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420220409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Lawrence, A. Hirschfeld. 2004. “The Cognitive Foundations of Cultural Stability and Diversity.Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8, no. 1: 4046. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Struch, Naomi, and Shalom, H. Schwartz. 1989. “Intergroup Aggression: Its Predictors and Distinctness from In-group Bias.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56, no. 3: 364–73. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tajfel, Henri, Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., and Flament, Claude. 1971. “Social Categorization and Intergroup Behaviour.European Journal of Social Psychology 1, no. 2: 149–78. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420010202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, and John, C. Turner. 1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” In Worchel, Stephen and Austin, William G., eds., Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago, Ill.: Nelson-Hall Publishers.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, John C. 1978. “Social Categorization and Social Discrimination in the Minimal Group Paradigm.” In Tajfel, Henri, ed., Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London, UK: Academic Press: 101–40.Google Scholar
Ura, Joseph Daniel, and Christopher, R. Ellis. 2012. “Partisan Moods: Polarization and the Dynamics of Mass Party Preferences.Journal of Politics 74, no. 1: 277–91. doi: 10.1017/S0022381611001587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Walle, Nicolas. 2006. “Tipping Games: When Do Opposition Parties Coalesce?” In Schedler, Andreas, ed., Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Wagner, Wolfgang, Kronberger, Nicole, and Seifert, Franz. 2002. “Collective Symbolic Coping with New Technology: Knowledge, Images, and Public Discourse.” British Journal of Social Psychology 41, no. 3: 323–43. doi: 10.1348/014466602760344241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Way, Lucan Ahmed, and Levitsky, Steven. 2002. “Elections without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.Journal of Democracy 13, no. 2: 5165. At https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/elections-without-democracy-the-rise-of-competitive-authoritarianism/, accessed January 14, 2020.Google Scholar
Wickham, Carrie Rosefsky. 2002. Mobilizing Islam: Religion, Activism, and Political Change in Egypt. New York, N.Y.: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wickham, Carrie Rosefsky. 2004. “The Path to Moderation: Strategy and Learning in the Formation of Egypt’s Wasat Party.Comparative Politics 36, no. 2: 205–28. doi: 10.2307/4150143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickham, Carrie Rosefsky. 2013. The Muslim Brotherhood: Evolution of an Islamist Movement. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Anne. 2017. Political Islam in Tunisia: The History of Ennahda. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Nugent supplementary material

Nugent supplementary material

Download Nugent supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 256 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Nugent Dataset

Link
6
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Psychology of Repression and Polarization
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The Psychology of Repression and Polarization
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The Psychology of Repression and Polarization
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *